Collection Video Lazper Collection [2024-10-20] [Lazper]

RavenOfOld

Depraved Bastard
Uploader
May 16, 2021
801
17,051
Cover.gif

Overview:
Lazper is a 3D artist who makes pics and short animations of girls from Street Fighter, Star Wars, Resident Evil, and various other series.​

Updated: 2024-10-20
Artist: Lazper - - -
Censorship: No
Language: None
Resolution: 1080 vids, up to 4K pics
Files: 18 vids, 40 pics
Length: ~ 3 minutes total, mostly 10 second loops
Genre:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Installation:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Change-log:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Torrent (2024-08-19)
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Download:
Collection: - - - -


ChunliBJ.gif Ada 2.jpeg Batgirl Harley 1.jpeg Chunli 1.png AnaThighjob.gif Juri 1.jpeg Juri 3.png Shepard 1.jpeg JuriBJ.gif
HarleyArrested.gif MercyCowgirl.gif MsMcCarney.gif AshleyBJ.gif
 
Last edited:

RavenOfOld

Depraved Bastard
Uploader
May 16, 2021
801
17,051
2024-10-20: Added unwatermarked collection

New artist, just started releasing animations a couple of months ago. I'm seeing some potential from this animator. The Chun-li and Harley animations look solid. I'm going to support him for a bit on patreon.
 
Last edited:

CuirCuir

Well-Known Member
Uploader
Jan 18, 2021
1,471
6,212
Here's the torrent (2024-08-19) that compile files from OP (Right Click > Save As .torrent). Feel free to share it on any public trackers to maximize peers and stay in seed:
 

Fzoner95

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2017
1,683
7,285
2024-11-17 UPDATE: Added the latest videos

I did my thing again. I kept only the videos I think that are worth keeping, interpolated and reencoded them (AV1/x265, 1080p, 60FPS) and normalized and renamed them all.
This results in 11 video files of about 38 MiB.



PS: Some of the animations look a bit jaggy. That usually happens when I have to detect doubled frames, but that wasn't the case here. Maybe the animations are rendered in a strange way.
 
Last edited:

JNSQ

Newbie
Jan 15, 2022
84
69
I did my thing again. I kept only the videos I think that are worth keeping, interpolated and reencoded them (AV1, 1080p, 60FPS) and normalized and renamed them all.
This results in 7 video files of about 23 MiB.

Enjoy!

PS: Some of the animations look a bit jaggy. That usually happens when I have to detect doubled frames, but that wasn't the case here. Maybe the animations are rendered in a strange way.
How did you do it? Keeping the file size ridiculously small while maintaining most of its quality
 

Fzoner95

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2017
1,683
7,285
I updated my archive in the post above, added the latest videos.

How did you do it? Keeping the file size ridiculously small while maintaining most of its quality
Let me give you the short version: All videos are compressed (except for maybe in the film industry). Some compression formats are older and some are newer. H.264 (AVC) ist still the standard for video files on the internet, even though it was released in 2003, just like MP3 is still used. Any PC or device from that time should play H.264-files. However, there are newer formats, that have a better compression. They require a more powerfull device for playing and they also need more calculation time/power to create. I use one of these: AV1. It's from 2018. Any normal computer or smartphone today should be able to play AV1 files, but some older low end machines might struggle and if you try to play them on an older TV (like on a USB drive plugged directly into the TV) they might not play at all.

Also, when I recompress the videos there is always some loss. I find that acceptable, others may not. It's a preference thing.
 

JNSQ

Newbie
Jan 15, 2022
84
69
I updated my archive in the post above, added the latest videos.


Let me give you the short version: All videos are compressed (except for maybe in the film industry). Some compression formats are older and some are newer. H.264 (AVC) ist still the standard for video files on the internet, even though it was released in 2003, just like MP3 is still used. Any PC or device from that time should play H.264-files. However, there are newer formats, that have a better compression. They require a more powerfull device for playing and they also need more calculation time/power to create. I use one of these: AV1. It's from 2018. Any normal computer or smartphone today should be able to play AV1 files, but some older low end machines might struggle and if you try to play them on an older TV (like on a USB drive plugged directly into the TV) they might not play at all.

Also, when I recompress the videos there is always some loss. I find that acceptable, others may not. It's a preference thing.
Thank you for the thorough explanation. I actually do my own conversion. I usually convert them into H265 and keep the bit rate at around 5000kbps, but oftentimes the video quality deteriorates drastically to the point where it's unacceptable. Since you didn't choose H265, I presume AV1 is superior? Edit: when I tried to convert videos into AV1 standard, my GPU didn't participate and the CPU did all the work unlike with H265, is it normal?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fzoner95

Fzoner95

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2017
1,683
7,285
Since you didn't choose H265, I presume AV1 is superior? Edit: when I tried to convert videos into AV1 standard, my GPU didn't participate and the CPU did all the work unlike with H265, is it normal?
It is a bit better in many cases, not in all though. x265 (which is the compressor everyone uses for H.265 files) is better for files with a lot of film grain. AV1 is newer and is royalty free, unlike H.265. That's why today youtube videos are often in AV1.
AV1.png

Video compression can happen in software (CPU) or hardware (GPU). GPU is usually much faster but also worse. It's good for real time things like online streaming. If you want to render a video in good quality you should use the CPU. AV1 compression in hardware is relatively new, so your card might not support it.

What software do you use to render?
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexander578397

JNSQ

Newbie
Jan 15, 2022
84
69
It is a bit better in many cases, not in all though. x265 (which is the compressor everyone uses for H.265 files) is better for files with a lot of film grain. AV1 is newer and is royalty free, unlike H.265. That's why today youtube videos are often in AV1.
View attachment 4232853

Video compression can happen in software (CPU) or hardware (GPU). GPU is usually much faster but also worse. It's good for real time things like online streaming. If you want to render a video in good quality you should use the CPU. AV1 compression in hardware is relatively new, so your card might not support it.

What software do you use to render?
I use Format Factory. My CPU sucks ass, it takes forever to render a 15-second video. My card is a 3070 laptop. Also I noticed my iPad doesn't seem to support AV1 format, it always uses software decoding. And software decoding AV1 with Nplayer always comes with insufferable lagging. Edit: I notice the Harley animation you posted in this thread is not in fact AV1 format since my iPad can decode it with hardware. I went through your posts for a little bit, found out the "ffmpeg batch av converter" you recommended. Do you have a prompt for H265 format?
 
Last edited:

Fzoner95

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2017
1,683
7,285
Do you have a prompt for H265 format?
-c:v libx265 -crf 23 -preset slow -x265-params "ctu=32:rskip=0"

crf is the quality setting. The lower the number, the better the quality and the bigger the file. The preset stands for a bunch of options that control the quality of the compression process and thus the speed. Slower means better compression but will obviously take longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JNSQ

JNSQ

Newbie
Jan 15, 2022
84
69
-c:v libx265 -crf 23 -preset slow -x265-params "ctu=32:rskip=0"

crf is the quality setting. The lower the number, the better the quality and the bigger the file. The preset stands for a bunch of options that control the quality of the compression process and thus the speed. Slower means better compression but will obviously take longer.
should I turn on the GPU decoding option?
 

Fzoner95

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2017
1,683
7,285
I added the latest video to my archive above.

should I turn on the GPU decoding option?
Well, no. As I said: Video compression can happen in software (CPU) or hardware (GPU). GPU is usually much faster but also worse. It's good for real time things like online streaming. If you want to render a video in good quality you should use the CPU.
You can play around with it of course, but the compressed video will probably look worse at a given bitrate than the original.