- Feb 17, 2024
- 428
- 467
On a meta level, you can only be exhausted with Selebus' writing and still be invested in the story and characters if what you like is the idea behind the story or the characters. The execution is too tied to Selebus' writing. Being exhausted with Selebus, tho, is a different matter.I think a significant majority of LiL readers have been long exhausted with the writing of Selebus, and are exclusively—or at least mostly—invested in LiL for two sole reasons: the characters and the purpose of it all (the time loop overarching plotline)
If it's the case where what you like is only the idea, there's a multitude of LiL "clones" to choose depending on how close to the LiL idea you want to be, and in each of those, you can see the quality is VERY different compared to LiL (not being too critical on SOME of those, LiL just set the goal too high, the few of them I chose to read have all my love). Like it or not, Selebus' way of telling the story is what has kept this going on despite Selebus.
Or, if you want.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
As pretentious as this may sound, the story that is being told through LiL needs the drawing out, otherwise it's efficiency WILL suffer. It'd just feel like a disturbing apologetic piece, or worse, something that even with a thorough reading feels like it's just throwing shit to the wall for mere shock value. Only actual critic would be to the sandbox model, though even there the generic events flesh out stuff.It doesn't take an awe-inspiring amount of talent to drop a winning hook and spend actual years drawing it out while simultaneously bragging about the length, but not the efficiency of said story.
EDIT: And, as mentioned in the post above mine, the basic idea is that, basic, but LiL has been kept afloat because of the execution of said idea.