- Jan 16, 2018
- 233
- 526
I like how you start with an obtuse statement, as if to laugh off my premise, then validate it by broadening it to all animals. Which, by the way, was the initial thing you did. Kinda weird, like you're grasping for straws.Those unicellular organism sure love having fun. Let's not forget how animals and humans themselves kill each other over the opposite sex. Humans are mostly an exception more than the rule. Yes, cats plays with their prey, but it ultimately serves the purpose of honing their predatory skills. Monkeys have sex with the opposite sex, but to relieve stress, not because they want a same sex partner for life. Dolphins? Well, Dolphins are another exception of that rule, and even then, they use dead fishes as fleshlights to relieve stress as well.
I also don't understand why you go fully practical with absolutely every example that you can think of. 'Them having fun doesn't count, it's just stress relief'. What act of recreation doesn't relieve stress? Why is that even factoring in? Does Chimps trying to get high not count also, because they're training toxin resistance or something? All this does is add details ontop of my point, not refute it.
Yeah, I often also bring up suspect statements about things that I don't care about.Maybe because, as he said, he doesn't really care? You seem deeply bothered over implications only you are making up with no proof other than your gut. If it bothers you, you are alone on that. Let people have opinions, and you are entitled to imply about them. I'm out as well, you are making a mountain out of a mole. What if I agree with Yoshida too? Am I the devil? Well, you are left to imply.
You realize conservative (regressive fools) do this 'you have no hard proof' thing all the time, right? It's not even applicable here. As I've said several times now, and what you refuse to acknowledge, is that the line he dropped didn't jive with the rest of his comment, and he immediately pulled out of talking about it.
That didn't originate in my gut, it originated from his actions that you can SEE by scrolling up. That is evidence, just one that you don't believe in because, I suspect, you're of like mind. If not, you'd have a better argument than 'oh, you can't prove anything'. I'd literally need a mind reading device to convince you at this point, only slam dunk evidence is not what everybody else in the universe operates on, buddy.
Speaking of gut feelings, where did you get the idea that I was trying to stop him from having an opinion? He should be able to express them, and I should be able to criticize them.
If you agree with Yoshida's hatred of homosexuals, then nah, you're not really a devil. Just a bigot. To be clear, I don't care that Yoshida hates homosexuals. He's a fictional character. But when you validate the hatred, which is likely what Chaos La Croix was probably doing, then you're kind of an assholes.
Last edited: