- Jun 10, 2020
- 192
- 387
Not to absolve amoral content creators in any capacity, but this whole shitty situation is only sustainable because people who pledge money to porn games are:Because it's human nature. Once someone discovers that they can get away with something, they are much less likely to shy away from that then we'd like to think simply on the principle that it's wrong, immoral, or unethical. For all our worth, people are inherently vulnerable to taking the path of least resistance even at the cost of it being detrimental to others it impacts. Especially in this day and age, developers with less experience than a professional dev working for a company can make plenty for less work than a typical job would require. You work you're own hours, can't be fired, don't need special training or college, don't have to answer to really anyone but yourself, it can't be shut down by your government for being deemed "nonessential"...what part of that occupation isn't more desirable that a typical 9 to 5?
1) Bad with managing their money, because "it's only a dollar/five dollars/ten dollars a month, so it's not a big deal if updates are slow and contain little content; I just want to show my support".
2) Thinking with their dicks, because they don't want to risk that a game that hits their buttons crashes and burns, even if it's obviously a patron-milking scam and the creator is making more than their monthly salary by doing nothing.
When you leash in a couple thousand people who think this way, congrats, you've escaped the rat race - you can live relatively normally while doing an absolutely miniscule amount of work each month to prevent pledge numbers dipping too low.
To be fair, there's also very little incentive to work harder because you know your extra effort is going to be pirated anyways (like how, even if you follow a model where public updates are just delayed but the game is available for free, your backer releases will still be shared).
So why not just do the minimum to appease the ones willing to line up and get milked? Having your stuff pirated in this case wouldn't affect your bottom line, and it minimizes the value of what the pirates make off with.
Crowdfunding is just an all-round terrible format that created and maintains the current situation, and unfortunately it isn't going to change since the platform also gets a cut, so they quietly encourage this shitty practice.
If the platform ever moves, it won't be to help patrons. It will only be if there's a big enough scandal to hit the mainstream news and damage their image.
Edit: And also, real jobs are shit too. It's understandable if some people want to escape from that hell, even if it means riding on the backs of other, more gullible (and horny) people.
Edit 2:
The situation is so messed up on so many different fronts, that any party that tries to be the morally upstanding one is only going to end up the loser.
Currently this is the patrons: they line up and pay even though they could pirate, and so they get milked for no worthwhile reward.
1) If the pirates switch to being patrons, they too just get milked for no worthwhile reward.
2) If the platform steps up to ensure patrons get their money's worth, the platform simply loses money (and probably content creators who shift to a less restrictive platform). Patron goodwill towards the platform means nothing since they're still only going to pay for content.
3) If the creator works harder to ensure patrons get their money's worth, they're just doing extra work for money they'd have gotten anyways. Only the patrons (and pirates) gain in this case: a better product on a faster release schedule (and in the case of the pirates, still free).
And of course, real jobs aren't going to get any better because it's all about employee exploitation and maximizing profits. There are enough people clamoring for jobs that they don't need to change anything, even if it drives a bunch of people towards dubious "alternative jobs" like crowdfunded porn.
Last edited: