Linear corruption?

[GNVE]

That doesn't resemble my experience, is that how sex works for others? I got to speak about this (not about porn games, but this idea of a linear progression to ever lewder sex acts) to people I know (both men and women) and they agreed that it doesn't work like that at all: some will have anal as their first experience, others will be licking some titties before having their first kiss, some more will do the most "extreme" acts during their teens and then switch to more vanilla sex as they grow older and more experienced, and so on.

When looking at averages on a population level scale there is a linear progression for sex. Generally speaking: masturbation > kissing > heavy kissing > petting over clothes > petting under clothes > fingering/handjobs > oral > sex
but those are averages and trouble with averages is that almost nobody is average. (E.g. when the Australian government went looking for the average Australian women several years ago for some kind of stunt they found exactly none in a country of 26 million).
It also depends on how open a country is about sex. In countries that are more open about sex and it is seen as a part of life and growing up chances are higher that this progression is followed (roughly speaking). This is because teens are better able to set boundaries about what they do and do not want. Since sex is discussed with them on a regular basis they have time to think beforehand on these questions rather than in the moment. they will hear not only from peers but from adults in their life about boundaries. (And not the hypocritical abstinence bullshit).
They are also more likely to have sex at home rather than in an alleyway behind school/club/cafe/etc where time is more limited for fear of being discovered/freezing your balls off which might want to make you skip steps.

It depends on what it is you're corrupting. In most games, especially most trainers, you're corrupting a naive and/or prudish girl,

That is putting it lightly. In most porn girls are not just naïve and prudish and innocent but have brain damage as well. I expect every girl that has passed the age of 18 to know what a cock is how sex works even if they do not actively participate (yet) and they know porn exists even if they have not seen it themselves.
One of my biggest gripes when I was younger was that girls in porn my age where all dressed as a 12yo while acting like they were 5. Not really a turn on.

 

[Dahakma]

It is a gamification of sex with the intention to create a sense of gradual progression. I agree that rigid progression with mandatory steps, especially involving grind, is very unrealistic. However, when the girl gets spitroasted and double penetrated during her first sexual encounter, it is hard to come up with future scenes that would top it. The trope of advancing from more vanilla acts to kinkier ones makes sense.

I think it is great to break tropes and create something original but I believe you will have to use something else to give the player the sense of progression.

 

[MarshmallowCasserole]

Spoiler: Talk about not understanding something, ha.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

So. Nudists, exhibitionists, and groping, where to start. Well, for one, nudists !=exhibitionists.

Exposing yourself to the general public != attending a nudist beach. These are vastly different in terms of corruption. Why? Because one is a transgression, and the other is not, because it conforms to the norms of the place or community (nudist beach, it's in the name).

Going out in public with tits out is more corrupt than being non-consensually groped. Attending a nudist beach is less corrupt than consenting to groping in public. These are not conflicting statements at all, because these statements are describing four different scenarios.

 

[Living In A Lewd World]

Spoiler: Talk about not understanding something, ha.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

So. Nudists, exhibitionists, and groping, where to start. Well, for one, nudists !=exhibitionists.

Exposing yourself to the general public != attending a nudist beach. These are vastly different in terms of corruption. Why? Because one is a transgression, and the other is not, because it conforms to the norms of the place or community (nudist beach, it's in the name).

Going out in public with tits out is more corrupt than being non-consensually groped. Attending a nudist beach is less corrupt than consenting to groping in public. These are not conflicting statements at all, because these statements are describing four different scenarios.

I know, in the general F95-discussions, having "low decency" (what is of course also subjective) and "being corrupted" are used almost exchangable. But for the sake of a good discussion, I suggest to differentiate between the two.

Going nude in public, liking to be groped or groping someone would rather be a question of decency.

Only if someone does through whatever means bring another person who didn't have initially the intention to do so to going nude in public, liking to be groped or groping someone and he/she does those things willingly. Then it is an act of corruption and is in my eyes also reflected in the F95-Definition:

Corrupting someone's mind or morals, and robbing them of their purity/innocence

I actually couldn't even say, how being corrupt would be translated into the lewd world, as this rather alludes to how easy a person can be influenced. But I think, you meaned rather how corrupted a person is as this would mean how much the person has been influenced to do lewd acts. So I take it rather for this.

Even if one just assumes, "being indecent" and "being corrupted" might be the same to simplify the discussion, the first comparison stays unfortunately problematic.

Being non-consensually groped has in my eyes nothing to do with the "decency" or "state of corruption" of the person being groped, as this act only tells something about the the violent perpetrator. So it only tells you something about the decency of the perpetrator, not the decency of the victim.

So either groping someone in public non-consensually or slapping the one groping you non-consensually, could be seen as acts, that show the state of decency.

If you focus more on this perspective , you might get a better comparison:

Going out in public with tits out is more indecent than slapping someone who gropes you non-consensually.
Attending a nudist beach might be less indecent than consenting to groping in public.

But it's still a question of subjective moral systems and of context. While I don't see in the modern western society any discussion about the first one, one could argue about the second one (dependent on the context).

An example:
When the persons goes arm in arm with its pardner and gropes the ass of the pardner in public and the pardner likes it, can this really be seen as indecent behaviour?
And how indecent would this be compared to attending a nude beach?