We'll have to agree to disagree on that. The writing didn't come off that way at all to me, and is inconsistent with all the other ways it's written in the game.
And again, context for 'why' isn't relevant for NTR. And I don't label anything as NTR if you need to use conjecture to fulfill the requirements when there's no explicitly overtones.
It's not conjecture, it's merely implied. Akin to those popular NTR pictures where the girl half opens the door all sweaty and disheveled for her cuckold boyfriend. She doesn't need to confirm to him what's been happening behind the door. The contextual information already implies she was just having sex with someone else.
It would only be conjecture had she not just
explicitly specified their intent was sex. From there her condition tells the player that her refusal to have sex was violently ignored, leaving her bruised and ashamed to look Mike in the eyes. She obviously didn't win the struggle, run away nor slip on a banana peel after agreeing to disagree with her bosses. So the implication being made in the scene is obviously rape. Just as had she came back with torn cum stained clothes, one would not just assume maybe clumsy ol' Shiori just having a freak accident at a sperm bank when the obvious implication is rape.
You also do see her strip against both their will. So even just there the situation boils down to a stronger man taking the woman of another weaker man and forcing her into sexual service. So unless you left the penetration requirement out by accident, it essentially already fits your provided definition before the implied rape incident.
I guess we do have to agree to disagree. Though I will say whereas I think the definition is accurate, I think this conversation demonstrates how the application can lack consistency between observers.
