- Jun 4, 2019
- 3,715
- 15,886
You have to meet Morgan before you get Kleio's first phonecall, otherwise, she's locked out.
Ren'Py Love & Sex Second Base [v24.11.0b] [Andrealphus]
- Thread starter N7
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg adventure anal sex big ass big tits cheating corruption creampie dating sim female domination female protagonist graphic violence harem lesbian male domination male protagonist milf multiple protagonist netorare oral sex pregnancy romance sandbox simulator spanking swinging teasing vaginal sex voiced
- Dec 1, 2019
- 8,766
- 14,878
It's not a "why" but if you follow the Twitter link in this post
you'll see that Cassidy isn't and probably won't be a member of the office harem.
- Apr 7, 2019
- 1,175
- 785
If yoou just want bimbo sasha you can use the command: "sasha.set_flag("haircut", True) the same with boobjob and there you have it to change back put False instead. If you want a save NO.
Yes, that's exactly the sort of solution I had in mind, but the words didn't come to my brain.
I love this game, it ran perfectly and without issue for the longest time until a few weeks ago. The game won't launch at all anymore. I've tried compatibility mode, troubleshooter, run as admin. I've redownload from multiple sources, installed to different drives on my windows 10 PC, with multiple versions of the game too. It just does not want to launch. Are there hidden files installed somewhere with saved settings/profile data that might be causing this issue?
I open the log and it says
Bootstrap to the start of init.init took 0.09s
Early init took 0.00s
Loader took 0.12s
Loading error handling took 0.12s
Loading script took 3.16s
I open the log and it says
Bootstrap to the start of init.init took 0.09s
Early init took 0.00s
Loader took 0.12s
Loading error handling took 0.12s
Loading script took 3.16s
Last edited:
- Apr 7, 2019
- 1,175
- 785
exactly, Kylie attends a support group with lots of great women, or she goes to a female therapist.....
- Jun 4, 2019
- 3,715
- 15,886
I'd almost agree with that, save for the fact that Kylie is dangerous no matter how you look at it. There's real thoughtful malice behind those crazy red eyes and phat ass.exactly, Kylie attends a support group with lots of great women, or she goes to a female therapist.....
- Kylie assaults Mike: She hits him with a taser. Thats forethought and planning, buying a taser with the thought of using it to incapacitate him if he tries to get away.
- Leading up to the Taming Harem, she feckin' brought a knife to try and attack someone in the shower. Now, Ayesha is a trained fighter and able to look after herself, but what if it was Emma or someone else she ended up targeting?
- Christmas + Yandere = Love and Sex's version of "Some Boat".
As much fun as it might be to imagine rehabilitating Kylie, she's still dangerous, both to herself and others. She needs more help than is going to be available in game. Unless you want to keep her in a straitjacket and a Hannibal Lector-esque facemask. Or a lobotomy...
Last edited:
- Jun 28, 2019
- 709
- 371
I would also argue that treating her would trivialize the character. Like it or not, this is what makes Kylie special to the story.
- Jun 21, 2020
- 13
- 0
I've same Problem .., Any advice ..?
in my opinion is my DirectX 11 can't get any higher..
I don't think so, the same thing just happened to me a while ago, I just closed it and ran it again and it's solved
(I have windows 7)
- Mar 9, 2018
- 142
- 145
The interface of this game is retarded. Nobody, absolutely nobody likes to play a game following a fucking walkthrough, so you don't mess up with no point of return. It's an utter fucking garbage game/communication interface, for shit like random stats having to be above/below a certain threshold in particular (one might argue that other choices should be obvious. No they're fucking not. You don't know my mindset.). Coupled with the overall grind to level up this and get money that, this is just frustrating.
Hard consequences of choices in such a game have to be not only implied (and left open to interpretation anyways...), no, they have to be made absolutely, literally, painfully fucking obvious. Yes, you do put a fucking WARNING SIGNAL there: if you do that, anon, this is going to happen. Are you fucking sure?
Besides, mutually exclusive content is a damn poor strategy for "replay value". Consider opportunity costs, and consider that instead of having mutually exclusive content, you might as well have both. If you like. Nobody is forced to proceed with some content if he doesn't like what he sees. And don't get me wrong and confuse this with customization, which by very nature is exclusive, but typically reversible. And if not, then that choice's consequences must be fucking indicated: anon, there's no way back, are you really sure to give that bitch the bodged surgery treatment?
And this goes for small, rather meaningless decisions as well. If a certain decision gives +5 this and -10 that, but the other decision gives +1 for each, then fucking indicate it. What's the point of hiding this information? There isn't any. It's not a puzzle. It's just a shitty, intransparent interface. If you wanna be anal about this, at least make it an option, with the reasonable default being to show such indications/warnings (call it easy mode, nobody gives a shit), and let brainlets turn it off in the options if their autism forces them to do so. For fucks sake.
The art is pretty inconsistent (same character, different perspective) and generally pretty damn ugly too.
I like the crazy yandere bitch. Nice honkers.
Hard consequences of choices in such a game have to be not only implied (and left open to interpretation anyways...), no, they have to be made absolutely, literally, painfully fucking obvious. Yes, you do put a fucking WARNING SIGNAL there: if you do that, anon, this is going to happen. Are you fucking sure?
Besides, mutually exclusive content is a damn poor strategy for "replay value". Consider opportunity costs, and consider that instead of having mutually exclusive content, you might as well have both. If you like. Nobody is forced to proceed with some content if he doesn't like what he sees. And don't get me wrong and confuse this with customization, which by very nature is exclusive, but typically reversible. And if not, then that choice's consequences must be fucking indicated: anon, there's no way back, are you really sure to give that bitch the bodged surgery treatment?
And this goes for small, rather meaningless decisions as well. If a certain decision gives +5 this and -10 that, but the other decision gives +1 for each, then fucking indicate it. What's the point of hiding this information? There isn't any. It's not a puzzle. It's just a shitty, intransparent interface. If you wanna be anal about this, at least make it an option, with the reasonable default being to show such indications/warnings (call it easy mode, nobody gives a shit), and let brainlets turn it off in the options if their autism forces them to do so. For fucks sake.
The art is pretty inconsistent (same character, different perspective) and generally pretty damn ugly too.
I like the crazy yandere bitch. Nice honkers.
- Dec 1, 2019
- 8,766
- 14,878
Ah, how I like a well phrased, witty, eloquent in depth analysis of a game, it is always a pleasure to read.The interface of this game is retarded. Nobody, absolutely nobody likes to play a game following a fucking walkthrough, so you don't mess up with no point of return. It's an utter fucking garbage game/communication interface, for shit like random stats having to be above/below a certain threshold in particular (one might argue that other choices should be obvious. No they're fucking not. You don't know my mindset.). Coupled with the overall grind to level up this and get money that, this is just frustrating.
Hard consequences of choices in such a game have to be not only implied (and left open to interpretation anyways...), no, they have to be made absolutely, literally, painfully fucking obvious. Yes, you do put a fucking WARNING SIGNAL there: if you do that, anon, this is going to happen. Are you fucking sure?
Besides, mutually exclusive content is a damn poor strategy for "replay value". Consider opportunity costs, and consider that instead of having mutually exclusive content, you might as well have both. If you like. Nobody is forced to proceed with some content if he doesn't like what he sees. And don't get me wrong and confuse this with customization, which by very nature is exclusive, but typically reversible. And if not, then that choice's consequences must be fucking indicated: anon, there's no way back, are you really sure to give that bitch the bodged surgery treatment?
And this goes for small, rather meaningless decisions as well. If a certain decision gives +5 this and -10 that, but the other decision gives +1 for each, then fucking indicate it. What's the point of hiding this information? There isn't any. It's not a puzzle. It's just a shitty, intransparent interface. If you wanna be anal about this, at least make it an option, with the reasonable default being to show such indications/warnings (call it easy mode, nobody gives a shit), and let brainlets turn it off in the options if their autism forces them to do so. For fucks sake.
The art is pretty inconsistent (same character, different perspective) and generally pretty damn ugly too.
I like the crazy yandere bitch. Nice honkers.
As for your post however: while your opinion is of course valid, and you not liking it is okay, some people actually do like less explicit choices that are not entirely spelled out. Some people actually do like games where they do not have to rush after everything in one walkthrough (not me, but some do). So please chill out.
I dont know how to say it but if you struggle this much with the game, you just aren't smart
There's just no putting it nicely. If you cant figure out how to bang your 2 roommates at the same time, play go fish or something less mentally taxing
There's just no putting it nicely. If you cant figure out how to bang your 2 roommates at the same time, play go fish or something less mentally taxing