Wielding morality as a weapon, and choosing to do it selectively because you're pissed off about something else entirely, is both hypocritical and evil. But you do you, I guess.
I take it the way Thatguy phrased it to mean that he "would" report it, not that he "did" report it. I could be wrong though.Your choice, of course, but to which end?
Once he is banned he won't surely update new content faster.
And Patreons aren't being forced to pay. They won't be happy the game they have invested money on is taken down without being finished.
There is improvements in game play but mostly it's under the hood stuff so it looks like there is not much that has changed.I'm very much against entitled player behavior, but in this very specific case it is entirely something else. The game itself did not improve one bit, on the contrary several things actually were straight downgrade from the previous versions. And it's not just the cut content. If someone watches this project for a longer time and played several version of it over the years it looks exactly like a scam. It might not be, but if something smells like shit and looks like shit is very likely shit. Just my 2cents.
Is it worth scrapping the current content and rebooting it?
In my opinion, that is a big NO but my opinion don't count for anything so it is what it is.
Some may see scam, others might see a test of faith. So it's up to the individual to decide. I have no opinion on this one way or the other as I have no stake in this.
That's not really how Patreon works. You are not buying anything on there, people are paying to support the developer/creator in doing the stuff they want to do.Something about Patreon and other subscription services results in people subbing and then very seldomly checking to see if the creator is making good on their value proposition, resulting in way too much leeway which creators abuse. It has resulted in untold amounts of unfinished games and lazy remakes.
The free form "pay me to do whatever the fuck I want this month" contract needs to die in a fire, and it needs to be replaced by something more structured like Kickstarter pledges -- subscriptions, but with predefined goals and actual consequences for not meeting them, like withholding payments until those goals are met.
So there's no actual goal there, the payment is like a tip in the sense of "I enjoyed your content" so here's some money to show my support. Enforcing consequences on a tip payment is not really workable.