- Apr 8, 2024
- 867
- 1,428
That's a hilarious failed attempt at retaining the high ground. I'd say it was pretty clear what he was referring to, and quoting more than the minimum necessary doesn't make him wrong. The only one who missed the meaning was you, because you were obviously too angry at being corrected (twice, now). Have a nice day, brave internet warriorWell, he was still wrong, IF, that was the 'part' he was referring to, he should have just referenced that part of the comment, not the whole .
Perhaps you are wrong, as to what you believe/think, they were referring to . . .