TomSawyer666
Member
- Aug 3, 2021
- 171
- 70
- 95
I think it is a game problem because I always have a few missing pics, same for Lewd Soulssome images are missing is it a game problem or mod problem?
I think it is a game problem because I always have a few missing pics, same for Lewd Soulssome images are missing is it a game problem or mod problem?
enthrift gotta fix it The game will be perfect if they just put a little more effort nglI think it is a game problem because I always have a few missing pics, same for Lewd Souls
I agree. The only thing worse is this dev. 11 abandoned games.Kudos to the patchers, modders and rippers that see this kind of low-effort crap and take the time to bypass the scammer's paywalls so people don't waste their time and money supporting this lazy garbage. Cheers and thanks for the effort, guys.
This is a pirate site, not a promotional marketing site for low-effort AI scammers. I don't mind seeing the game here, if there are enough people seriously interested in the content, but it should be clearly marked as a cash grab demo and the patches or content rips should be posted front and center, linked directly in the OP, for anything with this degree of paywall nonsense. If even one person on F95 misses the patches and ends up paying this guy, it just encourages them do to more of this shit.
This is my main problem with AI CG. Not that it's usually soulless and mediocre compared to actual human art, not that it represents wholescale theft and devaluation of the work of actual human artists, not that it's a terrible waste of computing power and resources, even though all of those things are true.I agree. The only thing worse is this dev. 11 abandoned games.
While making the necessary changes, I noticed that it was repeatedly stated that the Patreon content was available in version 1.9.5. For this reason, I wrote it that way, but of course, it applies to the version posted as 1.9.0.You meant 1.9.0 right?![]()
It's not theft.This is my main problem with AI CG. Not that it's usually soulless and mediocre compared to actual human art, not that it represents wholescale theft and devaluation of the work of actual human artists, not that it's a terrible waste of computing power and resources, even though all of those things are true.
sure it's notIt's not theft.
First and foremost, I do have friends who are artists, one an art artist, and another who does music stuff. The art artist I've never discussed ai with, while the music one likes ai. Secondly, show me the artist. Show me the artist they stole from. You're retarded, and a joke.sure it's notthey paid every writer and artist for every word and pixel they fed into their models. (jk, they couldn't be bothered to pay for anything, they just
You must be registered to see the linkseverything and shoved it all into the plagiarism machine. and even though it's a multi-billion dollar industry,You must be registered to see the linksif they have to pay all the artists they steal from.)
if you really want to know, i'd tell you to ask your friends who are writers or artists. but if you're out here defending AI, you don't have any friends who are writers or artists. and why would you? who would want to be friends with someone who thinks their life's work is not valuable enough to pay a dime for, but too valuable not to steal to feed into the machines, so people can make shitty copies of it, again without paying you a dime?
I notice you fail to have produced the artist that was supposedly stolen from.What are you, twelve?![]()