[VN] [RPGM] [Completed] Magical Fable: The Princess of Light [Final] [Magic House]

Feb 18, 2018
70
34
#21
You know this thing has actually become worthwhile to play since the translation is just so bad I can't stop laughing
855940_screenshots_20181202221951_1.jpg Well she seems to be in control of her inner sadist at least so Dil..Gildo will not become blind.
855940_screenshots_20181202222017_1.jpg Ow what an asshole 855940_screenshots_20181202222104_1.jpg Horny water sounds. With that mindset she's probably just hearing dripping from between her legs...
855940_screenshots_Game_2018-10-05_15-35-56.jpg Hey that's my line!
 
Likes: Suryujin
Jun 24, 2017
49
64
#22
Was going to make exactly the same comment, thanks for saving me the trouble. Honestly, the further left you go the more supportive you generally are of sex workers. CG and drawn porn has the added bonus of not causing any real life exploitation of vulnerable women.
I would agree if outrage culture wasn't a thing people look to be upset at something just to be upset. I think you have the left and sjw's confused yes sjw's are on the left but they are the extreme left like alt righters are on the extreme right. Sjw's would say that hentai games are objectifying women and there isn't any strong female characters that can avoid rape.
 
May 30, 2017
259
1,071
#24
I would agree if outrage culture wasn't a thing people look to be upset at something just to be upset. I think you have the left and sjw's confused yes sjw's are on the left but they are the extreme left like alt righters are on the extreme right. Sjw's would say that hentai games are objectifying women and there isn't any strong female characters that can avoid rape.
There is no standardized definition of SJW, it's not a term coined as a self-identifier, rather as a slur used by conservatives. There is no SJW agenda or hierarchy, it is not an organization, and there are no major progressive groups Im aware of that have started self identifying by the term. What people who use the term mean varies dramatically, yours is one interpretation, but I've seen people called sjws for not laughing at overtly racist/lgbt-phobic jokes or jokes about murder and rape, for not liking far right conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, for thinking that corporations upholding their community content guidelines isn't a free speech issue, for not liking Trump etcetcetc.

Conservatives police sexual morality far more than any other group around.
 
Likes: dd777
Jun 24, 2017
49
64
#26
There is no standardized definition of SJW, it's not a term coined as a self-identifier, rather as a slur used by conservatives. There is no SJW agenda or hierarchy, it is not an organization, and there are no major progressive groups Im aware of that have started self identifying by the term. What people who use the term mean varies dramatically, yours is one interpretation, but I've seen people called sjws for not laughing at overtly racist/lgbt-phobic jokes or jokes about murder and rape, for not liking far right conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, for thinking that corporations upholding their community content guidelines isn't a free speech issue, for not liking Trump etcetcetc.

Conservatives police sexual morality far more than any other group around.
Lol and conservatives get labeled as alt right all the time for having conservative views, what's your point? Both terms are overused but I think what most people would agree sjw's are the blue haired feminists saying if you don't use their correct pronouns it is a hate crime or anyone who holds EXTREME progressive views detrimental to society that the majority of people even on the left don't agree with. And while they don't self identify as it I'm pretty sure antifa would fall under "sjw" for the most part.
 
May 30, 2017
259
1,071
#27
Lol and conservatives get labeled as alt right all the time for having conservative views, what's your point? Both terms are overused but I think what most people would agree sjw's are the blue haired feminists saying if you don't use their correct pronouns it is a hate crime or anyone who holds EXTREME progressive views detrimental to society that the majority of people even on the left don't agree with. And while they don't self identify as it I'm pretty sure antifa would fall under "sjw" for the most part.
This is off topic, so this is the last comment Im making, but alt right IS a term coined as a self identifier. It's meaning was set by those that coined it to describe themselves. Thus SJW and alt right are vastly different; one is a vague undefined term used as a slur, the other is a term coined by a political movement to describe themselves. You yourself share two different definitions for SJW in your post - seeminglingy without realizing the irony, and your second definition is again enormously subjective and differs vastly depending on what political climate you exist in. Bernie Sanders for instance is an SJW to many, many people, but from a global perspective his policies are already in place in most of the western world.

The post this was based off said that it would be SJWs that would have censored a porn game, but censorship of sexual content is almost entirely a conservative ideal. Look at european and scandinavian cinema. Boobs and sex everywhere. You can disagree all you want but you are provably wrong on both your points.
 
Jun 24, 2017
49
64
#29
This is off topic, so this is the last comment Im making, but alt right IS a term coined as a self identifier. It's meaning was set by those that coined it to describe themselves. Thus SJW and alt right are vastly different; one is a vague undefined term used as a slur, the other is a term coined by a political movement to describe themselves. You yourself share two different definitions for SJW in your post - seeminglingy without realizing the irony, and your second definition is again enormously subjective and differs vastly depending on what political climate you exist in. Bernie Sanders for instance is an SJW to many, many people, but from a global perspective his policies are already in place in most of the western world.

The post this was based off said that it would be SJWs that would have censored a porn game, but censorship of sexual content is almost entirely a conservative ideal. Look at european and scandinavian cinema. Boobs and sex everywhere. You can disagree all you want but you are provably wrong on both your points.
Firstly, you are being disingenuous because people on the left use the term alt right as a insult to those who don't even identify as it so comparing that to the term sjw is a fair comparison because they are both insults to people who don't want to be identified as those things and I think you know that. I also said both are overused terms which is also true and a fair comparison. Also both can only apply to one side of the aisle for example a conservative SJW is as contradictory as an alt right leftist.

Secondly, I didn't give two different definitions at all. I said SJW is progressive views that are detrimental to society that are even viewed so by the LEFT. Most people would agree that not using someones pronouns is not a hate crime and shouldn't be prosecuted. Most people wouldn't condone violence as an means to push an ideology like antifa does even if someone may agree with some of the things they are saying. If the majority of society views it as detrimental then it is detrimental doesn't matter if it is subjective if only the few disagree. You say many, many people view Bernie Sanders as an SJW but you can't quantify that and in fact most people call him a socialist as an insult not an SJW. And again I already stated it was an overused term and gave an example of another overused term because you make it seem like only one side does it.

Lastly, You gave an example of why the left is for sex work not why SJW's are while they exist on the same side they aren't the same thing just like alt right and conservatives aren't the same thing. Nobody is arguing that some conservatives aren't for censorship of sexual content so you are having some imaginary argument that you created inside of your head. SJW's and conservatives both being for censorship of sexual content can be true the two things aren't mutually exclusive it will just be for different reasons. I listed an example of something an SJW would say "SJW's would say that hentai games are objectifying women and there isn't any strong female characters that can avoid rape." So I don't know how you bringing up some conservatives being for censorship of sexual content disputes the claim that SJW's are for it as well.

TLDR: I am saying both conservatives and SJW's would be for sexual censorship for different reasons the two things aren't mutually exclusive and you are trying to make it seem like it's just one side.

Edit: Also before you point out me saying "some conservatives" yes it is some most people watch porn conservative or not even the politicians running on some form of sexual censorship get caught having porn in their search history or get caught having hired a hooker or something. They campaign on that because it appeals to conservative christans who think it is morally wrong and not even all conservative christans hold those views. So yes while most conservative politicians would be for that because it sits well with a certain segment of their base the entire republican base or even the majority of the republican base don't hold those views however fighting against sexual censorship probably wouldn't be a hill they would die on.
 
Jan 2, 2018
8
9
#30
Lol and conservatives get labeled as alt right all the time for having conservative views, what's your point? Both terms are overused but I think what most people would agree sjw's are the blue haired feminists saying if you don't use their correct pronouns it is a hate crime or anyone who holds EXTREME progressive views detrimental to society that the majority of people even on the left don't agree with. And while they don't self identify as it I'm pretty sure antifa would fall under "sjw" for the most part.
Yeah except the term "SJW" has long been used as a reason to subvert ANY concept that isn't decidedly right leaning. Gay Marriage is considered an example of "SJW's" ruining society. Or any character that's not white and straight that appears in some form of media is deemed "SJW pandering". 5 years ago I'd agree with you but the term "SJW" has been weaponized much like "racist" has been. It doesn't represent far left or things considered progressive. It's used to undermine anything people on the alt-right simply don't like.

Which is probably why it's falling out of favor among everyone except those on the alt-right and is typically mocked before being taken seriously. When people start screaming "SJW" when a black guy appears in a movie it really loses a lot of it's weight.
 
Likes: dd777
Jun 24, 2017
49
64
#31
Yeah except the term "SJW" has long been used as a reason to subvert ANY concept that isn't decidedly right leaning. Gay Marriage is considered an example of "SJW's" ruining society. Or any character that's not white and straight that appears in some form of media is deemed "SJW pandering". 5 years ago I'd agree with you but the term "SJW" has been weaponized much like "racist" has been. It doesn't represent far left or things considered progressive. It's used to undermine anything people on the alt-right simply don't like.

Which is probably why it's falling out of favor among everyone except those on the alt-right and is typically mocked before being taken seriously. When people start screaming "SJW" when a black guy appears in a movie it really loses a lot of it's weight.
Which part specifically do you disagree with? I already stated in the post your quoting as well as follow up posts that the word is overused. Overused words do lose their meaning like alt right, nazi, fag, racist or the N word (specifically referring to the use of it as a friendly word for homie or when playing call of duty and losing to someone). But it's original meaning that is mostly agreed upon still applies to the things I've stated.

As for gay marriage being considered an example of SJW the majority of people don't hold those views or gay marriage wouldn't be a thing. Of course there is people on the right that would call those things SJW just like people on the left would call conservative people or views alt right or racist. Those terms have been used to shut down anything right leaning.

So again i'm not 100% sure on what we disagree with here unless you are trying to say that in todays political climate the left doesn't overuse the words alt right and racist. Which again I think would be disingenuous and part of the reason why Trump won. I hold more progressive views than anything but I just hate to see when any political party tries to make it seem like it's just one side.

My entire point responding to that guy was that SJW's wouldn't be for hentai games because they would think it's objectifying women. He was trying to make it seem like just conservatives would be for sexual censorship and conflating the entire left with SJW's by saying that the further left the more they are for sex work.

"It's used to undermine anything people on the alt-right simply don't like."

Also I know you probably don't intend this but the way you are framing this is like it's exclusively used by people on the alt right but you do know that there are a huge amount of teens and young adults that use the term SJW to apply to people or things being "politically correct". People don't like political correctness and those people use the term SJW way more than the alt righters you're talking about which by the way is a small percentage of the population.
 
Likes: Beanjam
May 30, 2017
259
1,071
#35
Stuff not directly relevant to discussion of the game is in spoilers to not clog the thread.
Secondly, I didn't give two different definitions at all.
1
sjw's are the blue haired feminists saying if you don't use their correct pronouns it is a hate crime
2
or anyone who holds EXTREME progressive views detrimental to society that the majority of people even on the left don't agree with
If the majority of society views it as detrimental then it is detrimental doesn't matter if it is subjective if only the few disagree.
That's silly, opinions not backed up by fact are subjective. When talking about evidenced based things, like social and economic policy, opinion is irrelevant. Most conservatives believe in (or at least push) trickle down economics, but there is no factual basis for it. There are large movements that deny climate change and vaccine safety, but their opinions are irrelevant. Many people would prefer not to pay any tax, from the poorest to the richest people, but that would be objectively bad. There is a reason that countries are run with representative democracies not total democracy.

You say many, many people view Bernie Sanders as an SJW but you can't quantify that and in fact most people call him a socialist as an insult not an SJW
Thanks for admitting they use both terms, proving my point. Secondly, if Im not allowed to quantify with many, how are you allowed to use most (a much grander quantification).

Also I know you probably don't intend this but the way you are framing this is like it's exclusively used by people on the alt right but you do know that there are a huge amount of teens and young adults that use the term SJW to apply to people or things being "politically correct". People don't like political correctness and those people use the term SJW way more than the alt righters you're talking about which by the way is a small percentage of the population.
Three more sets of quantifications that are larger than the one you criticized.

Suggested reading:

The page here even has multiple definitions. NONE of them match yours.


Again, a plethora of definitions


Still ill defined, but only because the groups that label themselves as alt-right are somewhat diverse. Not because it is a slur used to derail debates like SJW is. But it does share a set of values and principles, the people who use it proudly identify themselves with the term, but the main linking factor is white supremacism. "Alt-right online material has been identified as a contributing factor in the radicalization of young white men and linked to a range of far-right murders and terrorist attacks in the United States since 2014"

Now it's just my opinion, but I'd prefer having to deal with your blue haired internet whiner than a white supremacist extremist. But none of this is relevant to the thread.

Say what you will about the larger politics, but the people demanding censorship of Steam and the people on Patreon censoring based on the "glorification of sexual violence" are clearly coming at censorship from a left-perspective.
Conservatives have used glorification of violence as an attack on media, be it film, television, or video games for half a century, so I have no idea where you're getting that idea from. They have even used it frequently to deflect from talking about gun control after mass shootings. Secondly, this game doesnt include sexual violence so it isn't relevant to the OP.

Again, social justice is about treating everyone, particularly vulnerable people, with respect. Proponents want sex workers to work in safe conditions and to be treated with respect. Proponents of social justice would almost universally be fine with THIS GAME. A large percentage of conservatives would not. They think porn is immoral.

Jim Sterling and his ranting on about Rape Day is a prime example.
Did you even watch the video? He didn't ask for censorship, never has, he just commented that when you don't curate your content and set standards, politicians will move in and do it for you - which started to happen in the UK with rape day. Which they did in terms of video games - which forced the creation of the ESRB. Which they did with loot boxes - banned in belgium and being studied in many other countries by politicians. Which they did with comic books in the 40's and 50's until very recently. He wasn't saying the game doesn't have a right to exist - sure he thought it was gross, but everyone is entitled to their opinion. He just said that it doesn't belong on steam. Which both steam and the developer of the game agreed with.
 
Jan 1, 2019
1
5
#36
To the two arguing politics on an adult game pirate board: What is wrong with you? Take it outside for that as already advised.
Left's done a different angle to push censorship(Usually via the think of the children angle). Think about the current "transgender" issue, or "hate speech" nonsense(Especially in the US, where the first amendment does not exclude "hate speech"). Trying to play football with "Only one side does it" is utter codswallop, and you should be ashamed of yourself for being so dishonest.
While I understand the frustration involved here, this is really not the forum for it overall.

Good thing I get to collect these RPGs at least, for whenever the inevitable hits and everything gets locked down. Decent work. Thanks Rance!
 
Feb 18, 2018
70
34
#39
This and the lipstick wearing screencap above reminds me a bit of a manga I just started reading:
That one...It seemed to me he was like "I got NTR'd at least let me wear your lipstick as a parting gift!"
Can't say this is the first entertaining bad translations.
 

Attachments

Likes: Morte111