Make Ai Cg Default OFF in Search

[Jigglypuff Dragonslayer]

i say

View attachment 4895139
no no no

That thumb still looks better than mine

 

[rossanna]

What is good? What is bad? These definitions are so devoid of any meaning. Just you saying something is bad, doesnt make it so. The Godfather may be consider the best movie ever made but it still only has a 9.2 IMDB rating and 97% fresh on RottenTomato. Taste is arbitrary.

What is the difference between the fake Vogue Glamour shot that has been edited and photo-shopped to hell and back versus an AI picture? Both are no longer real. Does that fact that a person touched up her boobs and ass by hand make a difference? Newsflash, Porn movies arent 'real' either and the girl definitely faked her orgasm. Also the interest and 'love' the stripper is showing you is definitely Fake.

So what is "real"? It is all just Fantasy. I m okay if my fantasy is made with AI art. It is as 'un-real' as any other porn out there.

You dont like AI art. Fine. Use a the damn filter and get on with it.

You will not change the settings. People with better arguements have tried.

I would like this site, Like most other porn sites, Have that shit auto Blacklisted for everyone by default. Good bad yea that's subjective..... but bad anatomy and lack of proper flow is not. Its objective and easy to see.

 

[anne O'nymous]

i say

View attachment 4895139
no no no

Thanks for proving my point.

If your stick figures actually had "more soul than any ai can achieve", like you claimed, you wouldn't have needed to point to that error.

 

[tanstaafl]

Thanks for proving my point.

If your stick figures actually had "more soul than any ai can achieve", like you claimed, you wouldn't have needed to point to that error.

He knows enough about AI art that he knows that the fingers are fixable anyway. *shrug*

 

[rossanna]

He knows enough about AI art that he knows that the fingers are fixable anyway. *shrug*

And you don't know enough about people to realize lazy game makers using ai to make quick shit.exes wont Fucking fix shit. Looks good? good enough.

 

[tanstaafl]

And you don't know enough about people to realize lazy game makers using ai to make quick shit.exes wont Fucking fix shit. Looks good? good enough.

I agree with that statement. I do AI as a hobby because I find it fun. I don't make games, but I do fiddle around with it to see what I can do, push limits, etc. There's a huge wave of low effort attempts to make money coming out, I never tried to deny that. But high effort ai imaging can achieve a lot, but it actually takes effort and time, which defeats the "low effort cash grab" philosophy so...here we are.

 

[rossanna]

I agree with that statement. I do AI as a hobby because I find it fun. I don't make games, but I do fiddle around with it to see what I can do, push limits, etc. There's a huge wave of low effort attempts to make money coming out, I never tried to deny that. But high effort ai imaging can achieve a lot, but it actually takes effort and time, which defeats the "low effort cash grab" philosophy so...here we are.

Completely reversed. 9/10 there will be people not trying at all to make their game look good, and the last 1 tries and fails to make their game look good. Default off pls

 

[peterppp]

Thanks for proving my point.

If your stick figures actually had "more soul than any ai can achieve", like you claimed, you wouldn't have needed to point to that error.

that proved my point. ai stuff has no soul which those fingers from hell proved. i will quote myself

everytime someone tries to prove ai isnt crap, they end up proving it's crap. if you dont think so, good for you.

----------------

He knows enough about AI art that he knows that the fingers are fixable anyway. *shrug*

then it isnt the ai but human who did it

 

[tanstaafl]

then it isnt the ai but human who did it

Well yeah. For games it's lazy and low effort, for posting on the general forums posts they're 99% one and done to just show something. You act like every image drop in general needs to be as high effort as someone making a game or doing one of the ai challenges elsewhere here.

 

[tanstaafl]

Completely reversed. 9/10 there will be people not trying at all to make their game look good, and the last 1 tries and fails to make their game look good. Default off pls

Which one of these do you think is better?

 

[peterppp]

Well yeah. For games it's lazy and low effort, for posting on the general forums posts they're 99% one and done to just show something. You act like every image drop in general needs to be as high effort as someone making a game or doing one of the ai challenges elsewhere here.

no. i said what i draw had more soul than any ai stuff. you said a human can fix it, but then it isnt ai. stop making excuses and moving goalposts.

always a mistake entering an ai thread because it leads to seeing more ai crap and seeing people defending ai crap. i just want to stay away from it.

 

[tanstaafl]

no. i said what i draw had more soul than any ai stuff. you said a human can fix it, but then it isnt ai. stop making excuses and moving goalposts.

I literally said he can fix fingers and that you know that, you responded that it was lazy, I responded that 99% of stuff dropped here is one and done. I moved no goal posts. That is 100% of our interaction in this thread other than to say I looked up comic format possibilities. I think you're mixing conversations if you think I moved any goal posts.

 

[peterppp]

I literally said he can fix fingers and that you know that, you responded that it was lazy, I responded that 99% of stuff dropped here is one and done. I moved no goal posts. That is 100% of our interaction in this thread other than to say I looked up comic format possibilities. I think you're mixing conversations if you think I moved any goal posts.

you're the one mixing conversations. i didnt say lazy, that was rossanna

here is what i said

then it isnt the ai but human who did it

 

[tanstaafl]

you said a human can fix it,

I was talking about inpainting. I didn't say a human could fix it. I said " He knows enough about AI art that he knows that the fingers are fixable anyway"....AI art being the key in that sentence.

And I interpreted your statement to be implying the laziness by saying that it was low effort AI by...what...using photoshop I guess? Misinterpretation I guess if that isn't what you meant.

 

[peterppp]

I was talking about inpainting. I didn't say a human could fix it. I said " He knows enough about AI art that he knows that the fingers are fixable anyway"....AI art being the key in that sentence.

that's still human interaction.

look, i thought it said something everyone would agree with when i said my stuff had more soul than that made by an ai. because i have a soul (however we wanna define it) but an ai has not. do you people really wanna argue against that? or do you wanna argue that something without a soul can produce something with soul, essentially creating soul from nothing? that's a wild claim in that case. not necessarily dead on arrival but still

 

[tanstaafl]

look, i thought it said something everyone would agree with when i said my stuff had more soul than that made by an ai.

I never disagreed with that. Currently AI can only get any soul in an image by accidental placement of facial (or other) features. We've talked about it enough to know that I know AIs limitations. The only difference we have is that I like it and you dislike it.

 

[tanstaafl]

that's still human interaction.

It's highlighting a section of a picture then telling a prompt what you want in the highlighted section. Sure, it's a bit more interaction, but it's still 100% AI generating what goes in the highlighted section.

 

[peterppp]

I never disagreed with that. Currently AI can only get any soul in an image by accidental placement of facial (or other) features. We've talked about it enough to know that I know AIs limitations. The only difference we have is that I like it and you dislike it.

i hate being exposed to ai stuff from hell "in real life". i have no problem with ai cg games, i can just avoid them. but it's in professional stuff too (outside of adult gaming) where they use it to save money (presumably) but they let shit slip past. they might just be that bad at spotting disfigurement or they dont know human anatomy. i think maybe you missed my edit earlier.

fingers are one thing ai struggles with but something else i've noticed lately is teeth in open mouths which i've seen slip past quality checks in even professional publications (it made me mad to see it in one of the physical magazines i pay for). it's weird when the mouth looks like that of a 90 year old with hardly any teeth left. what the hell do they train these on?

 

[anne O'nymous]

that proved my point. ai stuff has no soul which those fingers from hell proved.

So, I guess that Picasso's Guernica have no soul too, since there isn't a single fucking thing right in that painting.

Or could it be that "soul" and "anatomically correct" aren't the same thing?

 

[peterppp]

So, I guess that Picasso's Guernica have no soul too, since there isn't a single fucking thing right in that painting.

Or could it be that "soul" and "anatomically correct" aren't the same thing?

picasso had a soul. ai has not. even though i think picasso's painting is ugly, some of his soul could have passed into it. ai has no soul to pass.