- Jul 3, 2020
- 404
- 471
- Thread starter Maximus14
- Start date
Just to be clear - what's the difference between this picture and the one you originally posted asking for opinions on the best outfit?
Because that certainly isn't an actual photograph of a real person, which is what I'd normally expect "in real life" to mean. I'm thinking the picture has been run through AI in an attempt to make it look more realistic than your modeling software does (assuming Daz3D plus something like Blender); however, if that's the case, not sure why you wouldn't say that. Would always be interested in seeing actual pictures of any real-life people used as the basis for your characters (even if fully clothed).
Excelent deduction Sherlock.
The characters in the game are not inspired by real people, or the dev could get into serious trouble for use of image, especially when the goal of the game is sexual in nature.
The realism of DAZ characters is sufficient for fantasy-based games, however, the use of AI is acceptable in these cases if you want to provide an "extra" realism that DAZ cannot provide.
Fortunately, in this game, the dev has taken care to present attractive characters from the beginning, which is why a pass through AI does not generate such a radical improvement, but rather provides an alternative appearance to what we see in the game.
I insist. This is your answer: provides an alternative appearance to what we see in the game
Look what happens in other game. On the left the game character we play. On the right the character passed through AI.
Be glad, that in Milfylicious you have attractive characters with or without AI.
Last edited:
Gotcha. Yes, I suppose if the art here were as (in my personal opinion) bad as what you were showing, then I suppose I could understand the choice of phrase better. Maximus14 , please consider my statement as a complement to the quality of your original renders, that running them through an AI engine doesn't really seem to make them more real to life.
Oh, and if a character was based on someone the dev personally knew and had gotten the permission of, or was built using the basics of hair color, possibly usual hair style, height and such of a real person (not in an "I traced from this photo" sort of way, but more in an inspired-by way), then it might be possible they'd have permission to show us a photo. I wasn't assuming any characters were thinly-veiled porn stars, and I would tend to assume that most such real-life inspirations would have certain assets exaggerated. Some people who draw 2d art use models of some sort to get basics shapes contours, muscles, etc. right. I suspect that the artists would possibly be more reluctant to see photos of such models than the models themselves, as just how much of their artwork is basically light-table photo-tracing might disappoint/disillusion their fans.
And yes, using real-world images in your art without permission can raise a stink. Back in the 1990s, this comic book cover caused a fair amount of consternation:
because the photo that was the background of the cover appeared to be (in fact, 99.999% definitely was) taken from an album cover of Christian recording artist Amy Grant, who was almost as enthusiastic about appearing on a comic book cover involving vampires and the occult as she would have been about finding out her image was being used in a port game. There was some out of court settlement, where Marvel admitted no wrongdoing (but the cover of the digital copy of the comic just has a solid red background).
Oh, and I should perhaps add that some people aren't fond of AI art, or even feel it's unethical to take existing pictures (photographic or drawn) and using them to generate sometimes similar images (I know of some images (elsewhere) that people have pointed to as reminding them of a particular actress, and where the similarities have been due to asking for faces that are similar to that actress, among others). I think that's why I'd suggest being straightforward in noting how these "real life" versions were generated. It's not a knock on what's being done, but an effort to encourage the direct statement that the images were touched up with AI. Some people are pretty virulent against such (I sort of see both sides). No need to have people complaining that someone is slipping AI art into the thread "on the sly".
Sorry if I caused offense by bringing it up. The example Vicho provided was very helpful, and I greatly appreciate it.
Last edited:
- Mar 10, 2024
- 3,473
- 5,260
exactly she sets it up he sees it and it sets up for a future foursome. For example the lesbian scientist flirted with his aunt. sure this would not add MC its about the corruption and desire that will benefit the MC.
- Dec 4, 2023
- 1,986
- 4,462
Time to change your pants then.ME WATCHING THE MAIN MENU IMAGES WITHOUT TRYING THE GAME :
There is a character with whom the MC has the greatest fantasies, but the happy ending with her has not yet arrived.
Even new characters are just being introduced to the game. So we don't know how his appetite will evolve
Then you wouldn't have a "Milfylicious", but an adult woman who looks like a teenager. This would break the good graphical coherence that this wonderful game has. So yeah: more huge tits and even bigger asses for me too.
Rachel in real life, you can find more images at
You must be registered to see the links
