- May 9, 2019
- 4,896
- 16,273
I explicitly said not all paths have to be different. Learn to read. Second, let me tell you exactly what you are saying, you moron.Jesus christ, you must have written a book on straw man arguments, because that was the largest paragraph of bullshit I've read in a while. I never said I want ALL options. I said that the addition of options is always good. And i explained why. And i even said that it does mean more work. It is much easier to add in branching paths once you have already committed to making branching paths, the only downside to this is more work but that is the only one. Because at the end of the day more choice means more players can experience a story the way they want, meaning more people can enjoy it and avoid the things they do not enjoy. You seem to think that adding more choices implies adding in a choice for everything at every turn. It doesn't. It would be really cool to do that, but it's not feasible. But adding in path choices IS very doable. MANY games on this site in fact have done and still do this. It isn't like there are a thousand girls in this like something like wvm or grandmas house or one of the other mega harem games around. It's a fairly reasonable cast that you could write in choices in a reasonable manner to allow for people to not pursue some characters while going after others, and based on certain characters personalities not include them in certain options as it would not make sense unless they write in something that happens to change that dynamic.
More benefits is better. Wow.. what a profound statement. We would not have realized that without you. What I have been saying is "yes, but it comes with additional cost" which you are totally discarding. "he can add more stuff" that comes with extra cost in development. For example, slower updates. WVM (up to what I read) and (I assume Grandma's house too from what I know) are precisely linear games in which you just have options to skip content. Those are essentially not choices. Remember i wrote explicit "real choices"?
There is also the fact that not all choices allow for good stories. Say you put in a game of Lion King choice to save Mufasa. Or choice to make Scar a good character. Or in spiderman choice not to be bitten by a spider... or choice to save uncle Ben. You destroy the character. then what do you do?
Proof that you have no idea how this works again. No, they dont have all that. They have patrons. Patrons that support the game. Start delaying development time or reducing the quality, those patrons will leave. Patron essentially works by reputation stuff. Fucking up your reputation is very costly.As for the resource argument. That's just you blowing hot air. They do not have share holders or a board of directors to please, so as long as they communicate with backers and keep a stable income, that resource use is stable and fine. So again, there is no reason to use lack of resources to say they can't do something. They have all of the tools required to do what they need to do already, and any assets they can't or do not want to make themselves they can buy or have commissioned with the income they are making, which is exactly what that income is for, to keep working on the project and eventually release it in full.
Those same girls you are trying to add were originally written in a way that contradicts harem. So those are unreasonable choices. Is like suddently asking the developer "i dont like werewolves, make MC a vampire instead". There is a continuity that you just shouldn't destroy. Yes, potentially he can make a very convoluted and complex, most likely long path in which those characters eventially accept harem. It is NOT reasonable to do this, at least no if you are expecting some quality.Now please explain what "stupid" things people are asking for here? What are these "no" requests you seem to think are being made? Are people asking for all the girls to suddenly grow dicks and fuck the mc? Are they asking for men to be in the harem? Maybe vore? No. Just some extra choices in a harem game, which in most cases revolve around choices in trying to get the girl to add into the harem, unless it's a kinetic novel with zero choice from the start.
This was just an example. Extreme precisely to make it clear. That i need to explain this is sad. The point was precisely that not everything in life is possible. I was even being extra nice but let me be clear now. There is, in my opinion given what I read from you, 0 chance you can get Margot Robbie. (disclaimer: honesty requires i said I have 0 chance too).And your monroe example is flawed. No, flat out wrong. We are not talking about options involving literally impossible things. We are talking about conversations with a person that can lead to different outcomes. Saying there is no chance to fuck marylin monroe is such a disingenuous take to make. Like yeah, she's fucking dead , that's not the kind of best outcome we are talking about, and you know it.
That something is used for a subset of what is supposed to be used does not contradict that its intend is broader. So I will post below this. Read carefully please.And yes. Nearly everything on this site is porn. If you don't think so, go and play this in public and see how that goes, and please take video of the outcome, it would be funny to see how passersby react to you fucking a demon women in a game on a laptop in some cafe or park somewhere. Saying this is not porn is just a semantics argument, and a wrong one at that.
The focus on harem happened midterm. In fact, it was so badly implemented that it required several updates to correct the inconsistency when all girls learned about each other. That was in fact my original post. The problem was that it was added to characters that are not written to allow for this. And they suddenly "sure it is fine". That is just terrible writing. Sticking to original design was a better alternative. You would not see me complain about this in Once in a lifetime, for example.And yes, this is a forum. A forum for a game with a focus on harem. So yeah, what are you doing here if you don't like these things or at least seem not to? That's like going onto the forum for a game with heavy ntr and complaining it doesn't have any vanila sex where the main character beats up the guy cucking him and taking back his love interest. It's just not on the table to begin with. So getting into an argument about it is just plain dumb. Like saying yeah i don't like this is one thing, but going on and on about why and how and what it should be like some of these people are about the harem needing to be removed, like why even bother chiming in at that point? It's not a product for them, nor was it ever, and trying to advocate for that to change is just plain silly.
Last edited: