- Thread starter dazedanon
- Start date
If we're discussing the "realism" of pregnancy mechanics in games, I'd also like to point out that pregnancies don't typically occur over the course of a day. Unless your game is taking place over literal months, pregnancy is not something that would even come up in a realistic setting.
Therefore, the only reason it would be in a game of this type, that takes place over days, would be if it's a fantasy pregnancy that is specifically there for the pregnancy fetishists.
Therefore, the only reason it would be in a game of this type, that takes place over days, would be if it's a fantasy pregnancy that is specifically there for the pregnancy fetishists.
- Jan 15, 2018
- 110
- 298
I did not, but I have visited a pretty interesting cave complex.
I do not mean that underground spaces are unrealistic. I mean, having them full of monsters, like it's some kind of zoo, is unrealistic.
The closest to a fantasy dungeon that existed in real life, are Vietnamese tunnels during Vietnam War. This post has good illustrations:
You must be registered to see the links
Every other "dungeon" was not really a place where any meaningful fighting happened. They might be mazes where one can get lost, but there is almost no physical danger.
Man I'm just happy to have a game with restraint mechanics that isn't another tickle torture simulator
- Oct 4, 2018
- 1,055
- 365
- Jul 23, 2023
- 224
- 282
sadly i can't find many good loli titles on f95, do they even like it, double standards huh, tho the game is good, but lacking erotic scenes
Rule 7 strongly restricts loli available on this site. If you are here just for the loli, it might be a good idea to look for alternative sites.
But with your signature... I think you need Mad Island and its DLC.
- Jun 24, 2018
- 567
- 1,107
They do that specifically as the line for legal regulations. Don't confuse utterly removed policy for what the fetish or whatever actually is. This site is the perfect example of that. Their use of futa/trans tag is in fact pretty different from lots of other places.
Most places that have policies against this kind of content are simply treading on the side of safety by banning anything that looks like it could be shota/loli, because they deal in porn and combining the two is all anyone will think from the outside looking in. On top of that, the sites themselves ofc hardly want to deal with confirmation nor do they care all that much. If it looks close enough then it's good enough to ban. Not only does that make sense, I agree with it as long as they're consistent about it.
A lolicon (and a shotacon) is Japanese slang once exclusively used to refer to real people who are pedophiles, especially given Japan's long-standing problem with joshi-kosei which you've probably seen called JKs in porn . JKs and the like are sadly an even bigger problem in Asia today, so the victim slang (loli/shota) is still used to refer to real people, sometimes as a pretty disgusting joke but sadly at times non-ironically, such as in the currently unraveling Kris allegations surrounding Mr Beast where Kris is being revealed as a monster.
The word bled into the western cultural geist along with tons of other Japanese culture as both their SFW and NSFW content spread and like a lot of slang it evolved to be used more widely. Just like various forms of sexual abuse and assualt such as blackmail, rape, coercion, etc, which is like 95% of hentai, shotacon/lolicon stuff in porn is usually portrayed as an unrealistic fetish.
You really should do more than drown yourself in porn, much less base your perceptions of the world on it.
Because that's weird. I also never called a real person a loli or anything. What I was saying is that just because someone has a petite bodytype or are flat-chested in non-real media doesn't automatically mean they're a loli.
Last edited:
I transcribed the 2nd-to-last preview image's text (not perfect but I think I did a decently good job at it), and started to translate it (using DeepL and Google Translate) in case anyone wants to know what it says.
Text:
子の他えっちな要素も！
CGイベント!
ボス戦敗北時は専用CGあリ！ほガにも町やダンジョンで発生するイベントも...
三ユ一テメモ
ちょっとだけ役立つモンスター図鑑、えっちな三ユーテの本音が見れちゃうかも・・・!?
Translation:
Other Erotic Elements!
CG Events!
When you lose a boss battle, there is a unique event! There are also events that occur in town and dungeons...
Myute Journal
A somewhat-useful monster journal, and you could get to see the true naughty feelings of Myute...!?
Text:
子の他えっちな要素も！
CGイベント!
ボス戦敗北時は専用CGあリ！ほガにも町やダンジョンで発生するイベントも...
三ユ一テメモ
ちょっとだけ役立つモンスター図鑑、えっちな三ユーテの本音が見れちゃうかも・・・!?
Translation:
Other Erotic Elements!
CG Events!
When you lose a boss battle, there is a unique event! There are also events that occur in town and dungeons...
Myute Journal
A somewhat-useful monster journal, and you could get to see the true naughty feelings of Myute...!?
Sometimes, the only way to get a game that's exactly to your tastes, is to make it yourself. Or at least mod an existing one.
- Dec 30, 2020
- 56
- 132
I've played both Amethyst and Emerald, they're quite good. But it's also been a bit since they came out, and while I do think things like Seraphier or Maken-Shi Sara were pretty good I'm not a fam of their character designs.
I just want more games like the quarta ones, fam.
- Jun 24, 2018
- 567
- 1,107
I think the problem is that it's just a niche subgenre/theme. I can basically think of those two games, plus Luna, plus this one we're in the thread of.
There was another magical girl game I recall that was about restraints and some tickling, but I think she was a stick too. Honestly surprised there aren't more games like this though, now that you mention it.
It's not all that uncommon? Naming a few magical girl-esque games with restraint without stick-figure MCs, there's Magical Valkyrie Lyristia (plus the spin-off), Egg of World, Elpis Rigis (though I believe that one has little to no penetration), and if you're willing to be a little lax with how involved restraint is, Celesphonia counts, too. (And maybe Mission Mermaiden if you want to branch into platformers?)
Unless I'm misunderstanding the genre you mean, that is?