Well, at least the meds aren't altering your perception of reality.
Someone has quite hatred for hearing things more than once, eh? We can rest easy knowing that this guy will never post in this thread again, because that would be very repetitive and he would prove himself to be an utter hypocrite who would deserve an instant Ignore.
I'm rooting for you, buddy! Stay true to your principles and prove your superiority to all us bootlickers by never posting here again! 
I get that OCD is a real thing, and that triggers can be overwhelming to some people with OCD, but most people with OCD understand that the world isn't going to conform to their ideal and consequently have developed or learned means of effectively dealing with their triggers. That might be something to work on...
Maybe rude wasn't the right word, but it was certainly obnoxious.
Thank you for the word I kept trying to think of when I ended up having to skip that enire "game" section. It truly was obnoxious, and if it was that bad when I typed it a few times, then the way more times it was typed in game was just as much if not more obnoxious.
But in the game it made sense in context. Even varying the words used wouldn't have helped because it was the sentiment that annoyed you and those like you, more than the words themselves used to express the sentiment.
That's a pretty myopic way of looking at it (he agrees with me, QED his post can't possibly be rude) when his post is by his own definition rude.
And why would anyone be surprised to get irritated replies?? Smells more like a troll job than legitimate feedback anyway, since the **phrase wasn't dialogue or text as part of the story but simply a visual marker to differentiate between real dialogue and in-game DND character lines spoke by the MD characters. Maybe a graphic (icon) in the text box would have been "better" BUT (a) that would have been more technically tedious to set up, and (b) some clown would have bitched about that too, so why bother?
I have ADHD and some OCD, it didn't bother me.
Hence my use of the word "anyone" rather than "everyone", it really does present different in most everyone. I use deliberate words for a reason, because as irritated as things can make me I realize it doesn't apply to all.
I won't argue about the definition of rudeness now. And obviously I'm not the arbiter of rudeness or anything else, same as anyone here. Still, in my opinion, irritating doesn't equal rude. I saw it kinda as a stylistic device, if that's the correct expression.That's a pretty myopic way of looking at it (he agrees with me, QED his post can't possibly be rude) when his post is by his own definition rude.
A. He finds the repetition of the phrase** irritating.
B. He decides to make a post deliberately repeating the same phrase
C. His post is intentionally rude.
If A and B, then C. Basic logic.
His choice was to intentionally be irritating in his post (by his own definition of what is irritating). What else would any rational person call that but "rude"??
And who freaking cares anyway? The DND scene is over, so complaining about it when it has no bearing on anything to come in future updates is a waste of everybody's time, no?
One last question: since you defend an intentionally annoying post, where do you draw the line? Would it be OK to complain that someone spit on you by spitting on other people to demonstrate that spitting is not nice?
Psst...you doubled your Post...
This whole discussion started to sound like lyrics from "Bohemian Rapsodie"Nope, that was in another reality.
Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you do the Fandango?
Yeah I just hung up with my Mother, sorry and thanks for the translation !Fantasy or even Phantasy, you aren't writing in German you know....
