It's fine for you to ramble on, but it'd be great if you didn't turn me into a strawman in the process. Ironically, the false assumption here (from the very beginning) is that you're assuming I actually made an assumption about the season-transition process. Which is quite odd, given that I asked a question about it.
I said this in response to someone else already, but I clarified what the deal was by asking because there was conflicting information. On one hand, a (common) "this is the end of the update" screen implies more content is to come. On the other hand, the presence of a season 3 implies season 2 is done.
It could mean a lot of things. It could be certain routes aren't complete. It could be a bug preventing continuing past a certain point. It could mean the screen was just never removed (turned out to be the case). And I could probably think of a couple more explanations for the conflicting information. But that's exactly why I
didn't make an assumption and just
asked. Being inquisitive is the literal antithesis of being assumptive in this context.
So no. I'm not surprised at the answer or setting myself up for disappointment by assuming things work a certain way. I just go with the flow, and ask what I don't know.
You can say it's not meant as an ad hominem, but that's getting increasingly harder to believe. Given that you keep trying to portray me as an irrational person and spending increasing amounts of effort in order to do so, despite me repeatedly pointing out what happened in a progressively blunt manner. Anyway, this is the maximum of my blunt setting so if you don't get it after this I'm done. I might like going with the flow but this is stagnant.