- Aug 4, 2022
- 3,124
- 6,065
Unless you're coding for macos in which case you're quite literally programming for Darwin.Remember that we must always program for the lowest rung of IQ.
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg ahegao anal sex animated big ass big tits corruption creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination graphic violence groping group sex handjob harem humor interracial lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game multiple endings oral sex pregnancy romance sex toys teasing titfuck urination vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
Look it was just a game mechanic question. So I have never played a this game before and I didn't know how the game and the decisions affected the game. Lowest IQ really SMH....
- Jun 20, 2022
- 6,708
- 11,161
You know what the funny thing is I actually know how to code, I have to run complex queries in Splunk, CrowdStrike, and other InfoSec applications when threat hunting. Analyze the Malware code and such. But I am the lowest rung of IQExactly. It's so simple that people feel the NEED to complicate it, because... toggling binary boxes is almost as addictive as bubble wrap.
This is JUST a suggestion to TropecitaGames & RiamMar , maybe make those boxes being visible be conditional on the state of a variable. As in, they only show up IF they are needed.
Remember that we must always program for the lowest rung of IQ.
Peace
- Jan 7, 2022
- 5,572
- 17,765
Wait. You think that was meant for YOU?
Dude, it is a common rule. When you build a UX you build it stupid proof. I don't mean YOU. It is actually the people that have the highest intelligence that fall prey of the over complication bug.
Relax. There's ZERO intention on my part to address YOU. Anyone that ever made a sophisticated interface knows that the KISS (keep it simple stupid) is THE rule. In this case, Trop and Riammar, opened the UI to be over complicated by the users. When options that aren't needed are made available, people think that they MUST use them, they rationalize it, then they enter in doubt, then they invert the meanings. It IS common knowledge among UX builders. Look it up.
That's why it must be coded for the lowest rung of IQ, so EVERYONE can use it. Got it????????
Peace
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,051
- 13,903
Wait, what? I truly hope it's not that customized bs some of these games have. Especially like the one with that detective and his wife and you can play as evil or good. Forgot the name now. When I see that shit, I drop the game.Wait. You think that was meant for YOU?
Dude, it is a common rule. When you build a UX you build it stupid proof. I don't mean YOU. It is actually the people that have the highest intelligence that fall prey of the over complication bug.
Relax. There's ZERO intention on my part to address YOU. Anyone that ever made a sophisticated interface knows that the KISS (keep it simple stupid) is THE rule. In this case, Trop and Riammar, opened the UI to be over complicated by the users. When options that aren't needed are made available, people think that they MUST use them, they rationalize it, then they enter in doubt, then they invert the meanings. It IS common knowledge among UX builders. Look it up.
That's why it must be coded for the lowest rung of IQ, so EVERYONE can use it. Got it????????
Peace
- Dec 17, 2021
- 3,941
- 9,921
Right click. Left click. Everything else is UI - Useless Interference. Jus' sayin'
Jus' sayin'
- May 11, 2020
- 10,724
- 16,336
- Jan 7, 2022
- 5,572
- 17,765
Every thing that you see that isn't an image (and some of the images too) is an interface. The parts that are interact-able, decorative elements and Informative elements all that is an Interface.
It MUST be built with simplicity and usability in mind, but, ALWAYS be coded to only make available what needs to be available.
I have no clue what you are on about with that game that I don't remember playing.
Peace
It's only useless if it's badly done.Right click. Left click. Everything else is UI - Useless Interference.
Peace
- Aug 4, 2022
- 3,124
- 6,065
Oh a bad UI can be much worse than merely useless...It's only useless if it's badly done.
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,051
- 13,903
I havn't seen what it looks like. Did I miss a screen some place?Every thing that you see that isn't an image (and some of the images too) is an interface. The parts that are interact-able, decorative elements and Informative elements all that is an Interface.
It MUST be built with simplicity and usability in mind, but, ALWAYS be coded to only make available what needs to be available.
I have no clue what you are on about with that game that I don't remember playing.
Peace
It's only useless if it's badly done.
Peace
Last edited:
- Jan 7, 2022
- 5,572
- 17,765
Oh, several examples came to mind...Oh a bad UI can be much worse than merely useless...
Got it.. Sorry Man my bad. Stressful day but that's still no excuse. We good?Wait. You think that was meant for YOU?
Dude, it is a common rule. When you build a UX you build it stupid proof. I don't mean YOU. It is actually the people that have the highest intelligence that fall prey of the over complication bug.
Relax. There's ZERO intention on my part to address YOU. Anyone that ever made a sophisticated interface knows that the KISS (keep it simple stupid) is THE rule. In this case, Trop and Riammar, opened the UI to be over complicated by the users. When options that aren't needed are made available, people think that they MUST use them, they rationalize it, then they enter in doubt, then they invert the meanings. It IS common knowledge among UX builders. Look it up.
That's why it must be coded for the lowest rung of IQ, so EVERYONE can use it. Got it????????
Peace
- Mar 31, 2022
- 3,590
- 6,998
- Jan 7, 2022
- 5,572
- 17,765
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,051
- 13,903
Words are cool, but actions speak louder. So, kissy time. Make it happen!We awesome
- Jan 7, 2022
- 5,572
- 17,765
S1n you're up...Words are cool, but actions speak louder. So, kissy time. Make it happen!
Peace
- Apr 26, 2020
- 16,306
- 38,201
How do you program for houseplants (I mean, some of the "people" on this forum.......)?Remember that we must always program for the lowest rung of IQ.
- Jan 7, 2022
- 5,572
- 17,765
Very, Very, carefully...
Asking them if they're sure, doesn't work. They take it as a challenge. Also, it's better if you don't let them delete anything.
It's been over 25 years, but I'm still traumatized from selling a PC to a friend, spending hours and hours configuring everything, then go to his house, install it, explain everything to my friend and to his son, 2nd Year University student, then go home. I had to return the next day, the computer wasn't working. I got there, managed to boot with a cd. Only to find out that those 2 genius had decided that there was too much stuff in the computer and had deleted EVERYTHING. Thankfully they weren't aware of Shift+Del. So, it was a matter of taking everything out of the Recycle bin.
So, you have to be vewy vewy caweful...
Peace
- Sep 15, 2017
- 1,056
- 4,034
Can't see Trop having posted about it yet (will get a f*ing rage fit if he answers seconds before me!)
Early on, my mod even deactivated some options, when you selected others (like Daph+Scarlet teaching). Anyway. Profiles will have the variables more discernable as "On Route" and optional "Started route on second/third opportunity".
This second/third variable is not really relevant for being on the route. It's just some smaller dialogue variance later on? TropecitaGames help me out here man!
Edit:
No Trop post seconds before mine! Good!
Blood pressure, down boy!
The variables for early path, second chance, third chance etc. have been reworked.Exactly. It's so simple that people feel the NEED to complicate it, because... toggling binary boxes is almost as addictive as bubble wrap.
This is JUST a suggestion to TropecitaGames & RiamMar , maybe make those boxes being visible be conditional on the state of a variable. As in, they only show up IF they are needed.
Remember that we must always program for the lowest rung of IQ.
Peace
- There is one variable for route on/off.
- There are up to two variables determining if you got on the path late (or in rare cases, very late).
Early on, my mod even deactivated some options, when you selected others (like Daph+Scarlet teaching). Anyway. Profiles will have the variables more discernable as "On Route" and optional "Started route on second/third opportunity".
This second/third variable is not really relevant for being on the route. It's just some smaller dialogue variance later on? TropecitaGames help me out here man!
Edit:
No Trop post seconds before mine! Good!
Blood pressure, down boy!