I think I'm just going to stop using Patreon for anything, forever, full stop. Their draconic practices really are just squashing far too much creative content, and I don't want them taking a cut of anything I pass on to creators anymore.
Yeah me to only thing is the platform isn't as nice as Patreon and doesn't offer as much to subs or developers they need to step up there game and become more competitive
Kris is part of the trust and safety team at Patreon with spies working for himIt seems to me that this is not the first complaint from Kris, I suspect he is a Patreon's licker
May be. but what I really meant was that when, I read Trope post about Kris, there is something similar to the letter that was previously in another incest game, that was also blocked by Patreon, only with a different name.Kris is part of the trust and safety team at Patreon with spies working for him
Agree 100%
pretty sure I know which letter your talking about
Most likely it's just a template. They wouldn't type out these things from scratch every time. Can pretty much guarantee the other devs have received exactly the same one with just the key details changed.
Of course, they won't do the same thing exactly exactly. but there is something in it, very similar complaints...
Sounds like he's just a punk ass pussy. Probably has a hard time getting it up.
That is precisely how it works. Banks and payment processors are businesses...in business to make a PROFIT. They would never turn down a method that increases their profit potential unless they were facing outside influences to stop those processes. The outside influences are agencies, institutions, or even governments themselves who have a majority of "legislative leadership" who have "moral majority" objections to the content. The only other possibility is that Patreon's leadership ITSELF is a "moral majority" population. But that is probably highly unlikely for the business they are in. So they are most likely being "told" by other agencies (credit card companies, institutions, government agencies) who have already been "threatened" by "moral majority" advocates themselves.
Brothers, I think the actual term I used was 'Evil Triplet'.I'm his Dark Triplett
Here you go
Hmm I thought you were the one who pissed in my lawnmower tank? Also, I'm not married and if you told my ol' lady I played with her lipstick, she'd tell you that she doesn't have any. She has lip gloss and the only time I play with it, is when she's wearing it.Nope I'm the one who will email your wife that you played with her Lipstick again
You know it is funny my neighbour mows his lawn now with a nail scissor,Hmm I thought you were the one who pissed in my lawnmower tank? Also, I'm not married and if you told my ol' lady I played with her lipstick, she'd tell you that she doesn't have any. She has lip gloss and the only time I play with it, is when she's wearing it.
specially on Saturday mornings Close, it's the credit card companies taking the position of the moral majority as you're putting it. Big credit card company's practically have a monopoly just split between the 2 biggest ones with a few smaller providers fighting for scraps and niches. Since the big 2 control so much of the market without any meaningful competition that they don't need to worry about tip toeing around public reaction or outside influence. Oh you're gonna boycott mastercard? Good for you, good luck working with the alternatives who take the same stances or don't provide the same coverage. Same with Visa. Meanwhile American Express isn't serviced at a lot of stores both online and brick and mortar. So it makes no sense that the credit card companies need to placate public approval when they practically own the entire industry and are absolutely needed to function in an increasingly online society. The only alternative, and only logical conclusion, is that it's internal pressure from their board of directors and share holders. Have to remember that the US is traditionally a very religious and socially conservative nation. The religious right has a long standing hold on a lot of the economic power of the nation and much of the generational wealth and they have a lot of influence on the policy, both public and private within it.
