Who is arguing over NTR/NTS? Not me, for sure! The subject was culkolding which is part of the dynamic between characters... And since we’re waiting for the DLC and nothing’s happening on the thread, is there any harm in discussing the game a bit?
And? That is part of the charm!
I'm not shielding myself from anything, I'm just waiting for the story to unroll.
Who is ‘everyone’?
Since you're here, no comment!
Who is ‘everyone’?
Personally, I don’t debate the interpretation of a word because there’s no debate possible since words have an established meaning. For example, the debate above, as far as I’m concerned, started from an assumption: Eric is 100% cuck.
When there are several words following each other, they create ideas, prejudices, concepts, whatever… That’s where we can debate. Certainly not on the interpretation of a word. That would be idiotic...
And recalling the meaning of a word is not debating, it’s just a reminder. Which can be necessary to introduce a debate in order to avoid any confusion.
Since you're here, no comment!
Huhu, this is the subject of many debates! I’m not going to try to get into it, because we’re dealing with human matters that are probably too far from what’s expected on a thread like this. My recent contributions are already on the edge, I wouldn’t want to exaggerate!
Following that logic, having sex with a woman is gay because she has a father who "made" her. Duh...
Hi, are you planning to add transformation to the bodies of girls? Like tattoo and piercing
naw that needs colab with a chick to bake the sauce in her oven
So a threesome with a man is not gay if a woman is involved?
Let me break it down then.
Not too much I hope, since it's a kinetic novel we wouldn't have any choice about it. I'm not a big fan of transformations, unless it's a moderate amount.
you deconstructed the fun out of my logical joke with your need to add yours on top by applying flawed logicLet me break it down then.
According to your logic it's gay to fap to something created by a man, but it's not gay to fuck a man's daughter because a woman was involved in the creation of said daughter. Following that logic, if CG had a female co-worker, fapping to this game wouldn't be gay anymore.
The exact same logic could be applied to sexual intercourse with a man aslong as a woman is somehow involved in the act.
So yeah, none of this makes any sense but I get it was mostly a joke anyway.
You have no idea how much of an autist I am!
My autism is forcing me to respond. You know you can scratch "logical" out of this. To assert that fapping to something created solely by a man is inherently gay ignores the complexity of sexual attraction entirely. Sexuality isn't determined by the gender of the creator; it involves personal attraction and context. Enjoying a work of art or media produced by a man doesn't equate to sexual attraction to men, otherwise everyone would be gay.
