Duckson1298
Member
- Sep 24, 2023
- 101
- 223
- 97
No information, but confidence is high it will happen (same with Bronwyn).When can we fucked the chicken?
The curse of porn game developers strikes again!high fever/shite sleep
MPP: Maple confronta e Doggy
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.[/CITAR]You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
My bro, what a beautiful thing, thank you very much.
My impression is that Dev alternates between Emelie and a side girl between each version. If we are getting Maple in v0.9, that means back to the princess in v.10 and another side girl (either the bookshop chick or Bronwen) in v.11? With maybe some development around the queen along the way....No information, but confidence is high it will happen (same with Bronwyn).
That would be v1.0 though. Expect version numbers 0.95, 0.951, and so on from now on.v.10
what you on about? alots of games just go past 10 after 1-9That would be v1.0 though. Expect version numbers 0.95, 0.951, and so on from now on.
Do you know how numbers work? 0.10 is 0.1, which is, like, less than 0.9. After 0.9 comes 1.0, which means a fully finished release. Which is obviously not going to happen with this game in the foreseeable futurewhat you on about? alots of games just go past 10 after 1-9
Software versioning doesn't always adhere to numeric rules. A lot of software uses 4 digits #.#.#.# that isn't a real number. Also, the developer doesn't know how many minor releases they will have within a major release. Maybe they should start with 0.0001 but that is rarely done. Most times 0.1 and 0.10 are not the same release.Do you know how numbers work? 0.10 is 0.1, which is, like, less than 0.9. After 0.9 comes 1.0, which means a fully finished release. Which is obviously not going to happen with this game in the foreseeable future
Fine, I read about it, and it turns out that this is true, and programmers do not actually care about numbers when they release their versions. BUT, according to0.1 and 0.10 are not the same release.
That would be v1.0 though. Expect version numbers 0.95, 0.951, and so on from now on.
Version numbers are not fractions. 0.9 is the 9th release of an unfinished project, 0.10, the 10th. 1.0 is considered by most people to be the first feature complete/finished release. Many games here have well over 30 releases (0.30) and are still unfinished. The patch/bugfix number that sometimes follows these two is technically optional, especially if it would be zero.Do you know how numbers work? 0.10 is 0.1, which is, like, less than 0.9. After 0.9 comes 1.0, which means a fully finished release. Which is obviously not going to happen with this game in the foreseeable future
I agree, we use Major.Minor.Patch versioning scheme.Fine, I read about it, and it turns out that this is true, and programmers do not actually care about numbers when they release their versions. BUT, according toYou must be registered to see the links, you should write 0.10.0, not just 0.10, if you want to use semantic versioning, but that's just one of the ways, of course.
I now understand that the dot is not a decimal point, and that version numbers are not real numbers at all. Which is still kinda gay in my opinion, but what do I know, I'm not a programmer
And the dots exist so we aren't restricted to 0-9 but can go for minor 420 and patch 69 without being forced to declaring it as a major release.I agree, we use Major.Minor.Patch versioning scheme.
YesGuys.... It's time to face the truth...
Are we furries?