4.20 star(s) 128 Votes

nickohoma

Member
Jan 11, 2022
299
1,864
I mean, tbf, the way it worded it would very much still count if she did it the next day and here it could be argued that Nathan did it for her already, so no need for double :D
Still tho, I get it, for balanced/dom players the mc feels a bit too "out" of the loop and what happens in that chapter. Would still argue to wait for the reworked part tho, since he made clear that is only next update... :D)
Laura describing getting fucked sounds hot to me. A man describing fucking my girlfriend sounds not hot (to me). If that's "close enough" for the writer (and MC), I will wish him great success and find green pastures elsewhere.

Totally cool with the folks who enjoyed it. Just a matter of taste.
 
Last edited:

Silwith

Active Member
Jan 27, 2021
537
975
Laura describing getting fucked sounds hot to me. A man describing fucking my girlfriend sounds not hot. If that's "close enough" for the writer (and MC), I will wish him great success and find green pastures elsewhere.
Laura describing herself being fucked, she can tell you her feelings, how it felt, etc
A guy telling you how he fucked your GF, is a guy telling you how inadequate you are and how he fucks her better. It's wrong.
Well, agree to disagree *shrug* I prefer the variety.
 

Neel24

New Member
Jul 25, 2017
5
9
Yeah I'm not disparaging any who were cool with bulls describing the sex. Just not my bag.
I mostly agree with you. In the context of how it happened with Nathan, I didn’t have a huge problem with it as I mentioned in my Patreon post. He’s chill enough where it didn’t bother me too much, but would I like that to be the norm or for it to happen all the time? Definitely not, and especially not from someone like Oliver.

If the MC and someone like Nathan want to bond over how they enjoy the sex with Laura and what they both enjoy, that’s fine by me too.
 

AcornHunter

Member
May 13, 2020
111
104
Laura describing herself being fucked, she can tell you her feelings, how it felt, etc
A guy telling you how he fucked your GF, is a guy telling you how inadequate you are and how he fucks her better. It's wrong.
I don't like it, but I don't see anything wrong with that.
This is about sharing with mutual agreement of everybody involved.
If two swinger couples decided to exchange wifes over weekend and men have conversation over the phone about fun they have do you think it also wrong?
What if one wife goes and another have a business trip and can't participate?
By the end of the day, you have an option, both in this game and in theoretical life scenario, to skip such conversation.
 

Lagunavii

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2023
1,006
1,226
I don't like it, but I don't see anything wrong with that.
This is about sharing with mutual agreement of everybody involved.
What's wrong with it is a matter of perspective. From the sub or neutral path, nothing at all, you're getting the information as you requested, and even getting it from the bull kinda puts you in your place as a sub... From the Dom perspective , you're getting the information from the bull and youre suddenly not the "Alpha" someone is describing how they fucked the partner. Not the partner describing how they got fucked. While they seem like the same thing in a sub/dom dynamic there is a clear distinction - information can be given in one scenario that can't be given in the other.
You are right though, you do get the option to skip the conversation... But still even later Laura doesn't have it with you.

As someone posted way earlier here, the rules of the game was that Laura was going to let you know what she was did... Laura doesn't... Nathan does... And even if Nathan doesn't Laura still doesn't.

I do understand that the rules are a little vague and open to interpretation so some people may not see a problem with it. People do. There is a clear power shift here and for the some if not most of the dom fans it's poor form.
 

hlfwaycrks

Member
Aug 7, 2024
496
861
What's wrong with it is a matter of perspective. From the sub or neutral path, nothing at all, you're getting the information as you requested, and even getting it from the bull kinda puts you in your place as a sub... From the Dom perspective , you're getting the information from the bull and youre suddenly not the "Alpha" someone is describing how they fucked the partner. Not the partner describing how they got fucked. While they seem like the same thing in a sub/dom dynamic there is a clear distinction - information can be given in one scenario that can't be given in the other.
You are right though, you do get the option to skip the conversation... But still even later Laura doesn't have it with you.

As someone posted way earlier here, the rules of the game was that Laura was going to let you know what she was did... Laura doesn't... Nathan does... And even if Nathan doesn't Laura still doesn't.

I do understand that the rules are a little vague and open to interpretation so some people may not see a problem with it. People do. There is a clear power shift here and for the some if not most of the dom fans it's poor form.
This is exactly the kind of post that I very much hope Le Stag keeps in mind for the 0.13 re-write/re-work. If it takes more time than the standard release schedule even, I'd rather the time be taken to get things right and fix these massive perspective flaws than to rush a revision of this size. I do have high hopes for it, but I really hope posts like these (which are along the same lines of my previous posts on the subject) are heeded.

Well, agree to disagree *shrug* I prefer the variety.
It's just a difference in your preference as to which path to take, it should be completely different based on your choice.
 

Lagunavii

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2023
1,006
1,226
Note that these improvements will span 2 different updates. 0.13 will focus on the Dom route, 0.14 will try to improve the "Consent" part, with more decisions from your part.
See the thing is i know "consent" is difficult - you do have to have at least one bull otherwise you have no game. it would be absolute fruitless to give the player the choice to deny every Bull. I do hope you manage to capture away that is pleasing to all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cedrog and Neel24

ass234

Newbie
Sep 21, 2019
36
74
Note that these improvements will span 2 different updates. 0.13 will focus on the Dom route, 0.14 will try to improve the "Consent" part, with more decisions from your part.
Hi Stag, Will having Laura sleep over be optional or is this somehow pivitol to the plot? It feels a little too intimate with everything else that happened last update, or is that what you meant by the consent part, ie. we can tell her if we are ok with sleeping over or not?
 
Last edited:
  • Angry
Reactions: Vzl14 and Cedrog

AcornHunter

Member
May 13, 2020
111
104
From the Dom perspective .......
First of all, again, you have an option (in the game) to say fuck off and ended conversation.
Second of all, this game is kinetic novel, and until it will be real virtual novel with real paths it will be hard for the dev to avoid such events. The best he can do is give you an option to stop conversation.
And finally, let's assume you are dom who decided to share your GF with me and allow me to use her as a sextoy.
If I call you and say something like, bro, thank you so much for such a gift, she is so sexy, so slutty, and at the same time clearly so in love with you and so obedient, because you told her so, I am so happy you two have this kink and I can benefit from that and enjoy her and bla.. bla.. bla..
Will you stop feeling Alpha?
The idea not wrong, it's just delivery of event a little sloppy... and again, kinetic novel, no real paths and appropriate variations. Dev has to use the same event/conversation to all paths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neel24
4.20 star(s) 128 Votes