4.10 star(s) 158 Votes

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
643
4,886
329
Big props for le stags efforts—rewriting Oliver must’ve been a grind! But losing the option to cut him out kills replay value for dominant stag or any route in general. Could we get a 'veto partner' choice post-intro to keep some control? Thanks!
Simply said, no.

If you can veto a partner, then that means I cannot use him for important story beats. Every chapter including him would have to be, ultimately, irrelevant to the story, to make it consistent for players that removed him. Which means that I'd have to use a single, mandatory bull for every important event.

Which is what I was doing, and what was the most common complaint about the game. Because people wanted the story to progress, and Nathan was the only one I could make it progress with, you got too much of Nathan.

Basically, if you can remove Oliver from the game, and I use him for a specific kink, you lose the possibility to get to that kink, even if that kink isn't directly tied to who Oliver is.

So, in order to add variety to the bulls, I have to make them mandatory. Or I open myself to a lot more complaints about missed content, story inconsistency, and lack of progression.
 

Antani101

Member
Oct 27, 2021
154
255
139
Le Stag will we get a chance to knock Oliver's disrespect down a peg if we're forced to keep him?

My issue is that he's arrogant and treats the MC with superiority and the chance of saying "hell no, you're not going to bang Laura without my approval" is really important.

Couldn't you leave Oliver like that and introduce a new character?
 

Dlord86

Newbie
Sep 5, 2021
57
49
141
Simply said, no.

If you can veto a partner, then that means I cannot use him for important story beats. Every chapter including him would have to be, ultimately, irrelevant to the story, to make it consistent for players that removed him. Which means that I'd have to use a single, mandatory bull for every important event.

Which is what I was doing, and what was the most common complaint about the game. Because people wanted the story to progress, and Nathan was the only one I could make it progress with, you got too much of Nathan.

Basically, if you can remove Oliver from the game, and I use him for a specific kink, you lose the possibility to get to that kink, even if that kink isn't directly tied to who Oliver is.

So, in order to add variety to the bulls, I have to make them mandatory. Or I open myself to a lot more complaints about missed content, story inconsistency, and lack of progression.
Fair enough—let’s move on then. I’m looking forward to seeing what future updates bring, especially with how the story’s been evolving.
 

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
643
4,886
329
Le Stag will we get a chance to knock Oliver's disrespect down a peg if we're forced to keep him?

My issue is that he's arrogant and treats the MC with superiority and the chance of saying "hell no, you're not going to bang Laura without my approval" is really important.
I'll detail it in next week showcase, but you'll have control over how Oliver behaves, and if you allow him to disrespect you.

My focus right now is both on him feeling humiliating enough for people that enjoy that (there's a lot of calling you variations of a "pathetic cuck"), and respectful enough for people that do not, while not becoming the same character as Nathan.

Couldn't you leave Oliver like that and introduce a new character?
I could have. But people voted to have Oliver back in-game, so that's what I'm doing.
 

obaid124

Member
Jun 16, 2017
101
67
185
[IQUOTE="Le Stag, post: 18448692, member: 7386876"]
I need more infos. When does it crashes? How? What Android are you using?
[/QUOTE]
I have version 14. It just loads then crashes. doesn't even let me in.
 

redoubt27

Active Member
Mar 6, 2024
850
1,383
229
#766
And I think there is no alternative. Which is sad, that my earlier choices are ignored.
Yup, it seems I forgot the alternative version for this one. My bad, I'll correct that.
As you can see, mistakes happen and can be corrected.
Constructive communication can get things done…lol

@Le Stag did you find the issue with the last updates Laura and MC picture, was the raw sex a result of our choices or an image issue ?
If you’re talking about image #766, looks like a missing image variant; presuming you made the correct choice back in ch43-44…
 

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
643
4,886
329
She has protein goals.

The real answer, though, is that there are people that have disabled your and/or Nathan creampies. So, each time I want to do one, I also have to do an alternative path. So, we go back to "every choice adds work, and that compounds at some point".
 

MagLev

Member
Oct 1, 2017
421
724
316
She has protein goals.

The real answer, though, is that there are people that have disabled your and/or Nathan creampies. So, each time I want to do one, I also have to do an alternative path. So, we go back to "every choice adds work, and that compounds at some point".
I will say, some chapters here or there without creampies are obviously fine (plus, we're only a short time removed from Laura's first ever creampie, one chapter removed from her first ever breeding play so it would make sense if she doesn't do it *every time* yet) but shouldn't the rule of thumb be that if people are going to keep turning down certain kinks at some point they just get less content, rather than those optional kinks get less "screentime" or you being forced to have a bunch of alternates?

And I'm pro-creampie so in this case I'm biased, but for the record if the fact I consistently turn down hints at MC eventually eating his own or a bull's cum (just not my thing) means that in X chapter I just get less content that's fine. There's a balance of course and you can't have a route where more selective playthroughs just have 0 pictures for several chapters but IMO the guiding rule should be that more kinks should mean more content on the whole.
 

ZergistRush

Newbie
Apr 5, 2017
79
263
143
Le Stag my problem is (with both versions) right after the installation it just says at the bottom "the app can't be installed". I've installed the one previous to this. Android 16 on Pixel 8 XL.
 

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
643
4,886
329
I will say, some chapters here or there without creampies are obviously fine (plus, we're only a short time removed from Laura's first ever creampie, one chapter removed from her first ever breeding play so it would make sense if she doesn't do it *every time* yet) but shouldn't the rule of thumb be that if people are going to keep turning down certain kinks at some point they just get less content, rather than those optional kinks get less "screentime" or you being forced to have a bunch of alternates?

And I'm pro-creampie so in this case I'm biased, but for the record if the fact I consistently turn down hints at MC eventually eating his own or a bull's cum (just not my thing) means that in X chapter I just get less content that's fine. There's a balance of course and you can't have a route where more selective playthroughs just have 0 pictures for several chapters but IMO the guiding rule should be that more kinks should mean more content on the whole.
For specific kinks, yes, you get less content.

But for things like creampies, I can't hardly skip whole scenes. That wouldn't make sense story-wise for Laura to not even have sex with you if you don't want to creampie her.

So, I have to choose between having two different scenes, or having Laura be a cum hungry slut that enjoys you cumming in her mouth. I alternate between them depending on the chapter.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Sword42
Jan 28, 2022
46
141
108
For specific kinks, yes, you get less content.

But for things like creampies, I can't hardly skip whole scenes. That wouldn't make sense story-wise for Laura to not even have sex with you if you don't want to creampie her.

So, I have to choose between having two different scenes, or having Laura be a cum hungry slut that enjoys you cumming in her mouth. I alternate between them depending on the chapter.
While I understand its more work, I think it could generally be handled with it just being a change in the ending of the scene, a few lines of dialogue difference, and then one of two pictures depending on previous choices. This approach could actually work for a lot of the different kinks. No need to rewrite the whole scene around including or not including the kink, as long as the scene allows for it to be inserted without being a jarring transition.

As you revisit some of the preferences, you could also eliminate a lot of choices based on previous decisions the player has made, which.... idk if that helps you simplify things or not? Hopefully?
 
4.10 star(s) 158 Votes