No I'm not.You’re literally going against the developer’s stated canon of the game lmao.
LeStag can you clear this for us?
I say that Laura ranks the MC above any bull. Am I right or wrong?
No I'm not.You’re literally going against the developer’s stated canon of the game lmao.
Would you also say that in the submissive cuck route, Laura's most degrading comments towards MC are to be taken as play rather than her genuine opinion?It may depend from your Tendency. Laura won't say the same things if you're a confident stag, or a submissive cuck. But, globally, some bulls might be better at sex than MC, and Laura doesn't hide it, but she still prefers sex with MC because he's her lover, and nothing can beat the intimacy of having sex with someone that knows you perfectly.
Nobody said anything about more times.Okay then, mister know-it-all, tell us everything. Nathan creampied Laura for the first time in Chapter 44. When did he do it again after that?
I would be curious about some statistics on that, personally he was gone as soon as he got cocky and bullish towards MC, you don't get to be disrespectful and keep banging Lauraeven though most still want Oliver in the story,
I mean if we work with the premise that MC is Laura's #1 for everything else, we can also assume that other bulls are "better" at sex than MC because of the added kink that works only with a healthy relationship running in the background. It's like the cheating spouse who rates the forbidden sex with their affair partner higher as long as their encounters stay hidden. Both Laura and MC also love to cheer each other on, which isn't something that works well on its own.It may depend from your Tendency. Laura won't say the same things if you're a confident stag, or a submissive cuck. But, globally, some bulls might be better at sex than MC, and Laura doesn't hide it, but she still prefers sex with MC because he's her lover, and nothing can beat the intimacy of having sex with someone that knows you perfectly.
You can assume everything you want. You'd be dead wrong regarding Liam, though, and probably regarding Mike as well. And even with Nathan and Oliver, there's nothing that says thay're "better lovers" than MC (and you can bet that Hugo won't be better either when Laura decides to put him in her bed). What makes Nathan the best choice as far as bulls are concerned is:we can also assume that other bulls are "better" at sex than MC
Nah. Nathan is a cool dude. He'd offer to take pics while MC is fucking his GF (I mean, it's the least he can do, at this stage), especially if that means he gets another chance to bone Laura.Nathan could say no to Laura one evening because MC has started to flirt with his GF.
Wait, what? There are actual statistics on that?
This was a direct quote from LeStag in case you missed it.You can assume everything you want.
Not against it happening in the end. A little more resistance, even if it's just a couple of lines here and there, would make the experience more realistic and spicier in my opinion. Nathan being a cool dude doesn't mean he can't also have a bad day once in a while. It's only human.Nah. Nathan is a cool dude. He'd offer to take pics while MC is fucking his GF
He is a huge unused potential in my opinion. In the first time playing the game I didn't like the dude and opted to remove him from the story.
I'm looking forward to more story from the shy guy she's flirted with.We can't have every charector being the same, it would make the game quite boring.
Yeah but the other part was:This was a direct quote from LeStag in case you missed it.
And everyone know how much the stuff that comes before the "but" matters.but she still prefers sex with MC because he's her lover, and nothing can beat the intimacy of having sex with someone that knows you perfectly.
I also removed Oliver from the story, and I agree that's why I did that.He is a huge unused potential in my opinion. In the first time playing the game I didn't like the dude and opted to remove him from the story.
I think the hate came for Oliver, when he went straight to ordering the MC after a few interaction.
It's the difference between fine dining vs. comfort food. One can be objectively the better food that is enjoyable if sampled occasionally while the other is something for the soul and a more fulfilling option.And everyone know how much the stuff that comes before the "but" matters.
That works, you can rank fine dining objectively but comfort food will always be a personal matter.It's the difference between fine dining vs. comfort food. One can be objectively the better food that is enjoyable if sampled occasionally while the other is something for the soul and a more fulfilling option.
Yes, it really doesn't matter if they're better at sex or fulfill her fantasies in a way MC alone isn't able to. She doesn't love them. The other guys are more or less exchangeable. There's always a nicer cock right around the corner.What matters here, however, is that MC is the best option for Laura, even if other dudes might have bigus dickus or more stamina or stronger thrust or whatever.
That's a fantastic idea.In my opinion, giving certain roles to reappearing bulls will help the story in a huge way. Like Nathan being chill one, Hugo being the submissive one and Oliver being the dominant one. Give them appropriate kinks to enjoy with Laura.
I'm not Le Stag, but I think it's kinda obvious in the game that yes, Laura's teasing comments are more playful than anything else.Would you also say that in the submissive cuck route, Laura's most degrading comments towards MC are to be taken as play rather than her genuine opinion?