AI Porn is here, Create and Fap TRY FREE
x
4.10 star(s) 170 Votes

RiseFlash

Newbie
Sep 1, 2020
49
20
132
why not have a choice like MC dick size and a choice that like how much we make FMC climax or the MC never once at all make FMC cum (i'm just suggesting, that's all)
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Sword42

MagLev

Member
Oct 1, 2017
455
766
367
why not have a choice like MC dick size and a choice that like how much we make FMC climax or the MC never once at all make FMC cum (i'm just suggesting, that's all)
Because that's not what the story is per what Le Stag sees it like, from what he's said before. The canon setting is that Laura is satisfied by MC, but in stag routes he likes sharing her with other men while in cuck routes he feels inadequate and/or wants to be told he is inadequate but either way it's all about him.

Secondary reason not to have an option for him to have a tiny dick is it'd be tough to have two sets of images to account for both. I mean, there's already some dick size inconsistencies but if you make MC have a canonically tiny dick then that's tougher to account for still.

As for how Stag will implement chastity content, I'm curious too. From a cuck MC's POV it's easy to see why it'd appealing to him but you do indeed need to balance that with how Laura would feel about giving up sex with MC for prolonged periods of time. A night of denial here or there could add to the pleasure she gets from his reclaiming so that's fine but if it gets into much longer period that's trickier from her POV.
 

Sayora

Member
Oct 17, 2017
281
424
277
As for how Stag will implement chastity content, I'm curious too. From a cuck MC's POV it's easy to see why it'd appealing to him but you do indeed need to balance that with how Laura would feel about giving up sex with MC for prolonged periods of time. A night of denial here or there could add to the pleasure she gets from his reclaiming so that's fine but if it gets into much longer period that's trickier from her POV.
I don't see a problem at all – she already has plenty of options for sexual satisfaction outside of sex with the MC. Especially since the kink of refusing sex has already been stated. Besides, as you said, abstinence will only intensify
the passion and the end result, regardless of the partner. So everyone will be happy within the limits of their desires.

The demand to reclaim her after the adventures is especially annoying (this is probably the biggest drawback for me since the beginning of the game). Although I want to note that Laura's comments about MC's pathetic attempts to reclaim her after having sex with others are also very hot.
I'd like to see the MC and Laura minimize or even stop having sex with each other, and if that's what it takesa chastity cage, then I'm all for it.
 
Last edited:
Jul 28, 2025
95
289
114
I don't see a problem at all – she already has plenty of options for sexual satisfaction outside of sex with the MC. Especially since the kink of refusing sex has already been stated. Besides, as you said, abstinence will only intensify
the passion and the end result, regardless of the partner. So everyone will be happy within the limits of their desires.

The demand to reclaim her after the adventures is especially annoying (this is probably the biggest drawback for me since the beginning of the game).
I'd like to see the MC and Laura minimize or even stop having sex with each other, and if that's what it takes
a chastity cage, then I'm all for it.
The 'reclaiming' delusion has become such a tired cliche in this genre of porn.
 

Sayora

Member
Oct 17, 2017
281
424
277
The 'reclaiming' delusion has become such a tired cliche in this genre of porn.
For me personally, this procedure is completely meaningless, although I admit that there are people who see some sacred meaning in it.

upd:
I take it back.
It makes sense if you look at it from Laura's perspective.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: Sword42

MagLev

Member
Oct 1, 2017
455
766
367
I don't see a problem at all – she already has plenty of options for sexual satisfaction outside of sex with the MC.
Even so, having alternatives doesn't in and of itself provide added value for Laura that would make her want prolonged periods without sex with MC, an act she canonically enjoys a lot. So again, a few denial nights are perfectly fine and reasonable but it's unclear to me what she'd get out of stretching those periods much longer or, as you later suggest, making them permanent. It would fit MC's (in sub cuck routes) wants but it wouldn't fit hers unless Stag introduced a shift in her character where she doesn't really want MC anymore but that goes against every story beat so far.
 

TurboKinetics

Professionally Tired
Game Developer
Apr 30, 2025
1,152
1,683
214
I don't see a problem at all – she already has plenty of options for sexual satisfaction outside of sex with the MC. Especially since the kink of refusing sex has already been stated. Besides, as you said, abstinence will only intensify
the passion and the end result, regardless of the partner. So everyone will be happy within the limits of their desires.

The demand to reclaim her after the adventures is especially annoying (this is probably the biggest drawback for me since the beginning of the game). Although I want to note that Laura's comments about MC's pathetic attempts to reclaim her after having sex with others are also very hot.
I'd like to see the MC and Laura minimize or even stop having sex with each other, and if that's what it takesa chastity cage, then I'm all for it.
not everyone is sex denial submissive though or into that all the time. if thats your thing you probably wouldnt understand reclaiming fully. dont mean that in a judgemental way, different strokes for different folks. but its pretty important for nts games that want dom MC capibilities.
 
Jul 28, 2025
95
289
114
Even so, having alternatives doesn't in and of itself provide added value for Laura that would make her want prolonged periods without sex with MC, an act she canonically enjoys a lot. So again, a few denial nights are perfectly fine and reasonable but it's unclear to me what she'd get out of stretching those periods much longer or, as you later suggest, making them permanent. It would fit MC's (in sub cuck routes) wants but it wouldn't fit hers unless Stag introduced a shift in her character where she doesn't really want MC anymore but that goes against every story beat so far.
Lets be honest, the author assured you all that Laura really likes the MC best, because over half of you believe that Laura is your real girlfriend, and would have a panic attack if this wasn't the case.
 

Sayora

Member
Oct 17, 2017
281
424
277
Even so, having alternatives doesn't in and of itself provide added value for Laura that would make her want prolonged periods without sex with MC, an act she canonically enjoys a lot. So again, a few denial nights are perfectly fine and reasonable but it's unclear to me what she'd get out of stretching those periods much longer or, as you later suggest, making them permanent. It would fit MC's (in sub cuck routes) wants but it wouldn't fit hers unless Stag introduced a shift in her character where she doesn't really want MC anymore but that goes against every story beat so far.
You're both right and wrong.
It's easy to replace the physical component, but not the emotional and feeling one.
I don't expect MС and Laura to break up.
The spiritual intimacy and the cuddles in bed won't go away, but she can easily experience the physical aspect of intimacy without MC., which has already been proven many times in practice. (For example, her last date with Oliver clearly went better than all her expectations.)

not everyone is sex denial submissive though or into that all the time. if thats your thing you probably wouldnt understand reclaiming fully. dont mean that in a judgemental way, different strokes for different folks. but its pretty important for nts games that want dom MC capibilities.
That's pretty much what I thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TurboKinetics

MagLev

Member
Oct 1, 2017
455
766
367
You're both right and wrong.
It's easy to replace the physical component, but not the emotional and feeling one.
I don't expect MС and Laura to break up.
The spiritual intimacy and the cuddles in bed won't go away, but she can easily experience the physical aspect of intimacy without MC., which has already been proven many times in practice. (For example, her last date with Oliver clearly went better than all her expectations.)
I'm not denying she can be satisfied by other men, what I'm questioning is what she gets if she denies herself sex with MC beyond an occasional bit of denial. Because that's the key, she can physical satisfaction from bulls AND get it from MC and she enjoys both, so if she's going to deny MC for longer periods/forever we need a reason why she feels that's to her benefit, IMO.

Lets be honest, the author assured you all that Laura really likes the MC best, because over half of you believe that Laura is your real girlfriend, and would have a panic attack if this wasn't the case.
Yawn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morgenes

Sayora

Member
Oct 17, 2017
281
424
277
I'm not denying she can be satisfied by other men, what I'm questioning is what she gets if she denies herself sex with MC beyond an occasional bit of denial. Because that's the key, she can physical satisfaction from bulls AND get it from MC and she enjoys both, so if she's going to deny MC for longer periods/forever we need a reason why she feels that's to her benefit, IMO.
Benefit. She doesn't lose anything, but she helps the MC with his kink.
Ultimately, this is the sub's path, and in theory, it won't affect the stag's path in any way.
 

RiseFlash

Newbie
Sep 1, 2020
49
20
132
Because that's not what the story is per what Le Stag sees it like, from what he's said before. The canon setting is that Laura is satisfied by MC, but in stag routes he likes sharing her with other men while in cuck routes he feels inadequate and/or wants to be told he is inadequate but either way it's all about him.

Secondary reason not to have an option for him to have a tiny dick is it'd be tough to have two sets of images to account for both. I mean, there's already some dick size inconsistencies but if you make MC have a canonically tiny dick then that's tougher to account for still.

As for how Stag will implement chastity content, I'm curious too. From a cuck MC's POV it's easy to see why it'd appealing to him but you do indeed need to balance that with how Laura would feel about giving up sex with MC for prolonged periods of time. A night of denial here or there could add to the pleasure she gets from his reclaiming so that's fine but if it gets into much longer period that's trickier from her POV.
ohhh so it's like that.. i see, but i think it's more hot if Le Stag include that, but well... it's the developer it's self what they want to do with their game, i only give my opinion and suggestion
 

Handyfff

Member
Jul 19, 2021
103
175
217
What's with people asking for FMC totally denying him?

MC enjoys being submissive and likes to watch.

He can actually fuck (even on sub routes)

He's not an impotent 60 year old. People just asking for the divorce simulator :sick:

It's because of that last Oliver chapter isn't it? I hope this game doesn't get fucking ruined.
 

Ronjonsurf69

Member
Oct 27, 2024
128
189
62
In my head cannon I never shared Laura in the first place. So jokes on you le stag :D

(At least not with Oliver because he is a total jerk)
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Cedrog

Sabantuy

Newbie
Feb 8, 2025
36
30
53
Hey guys who played it already, is the latest update GOOD? :rolleyes:

(can't wait for it to appear publicly)
 

JQuillon

Member
Oct 10, 2023
443
690
205
Hey guys who played it already, is the latest update GOOD? :rolleyes:

(can't wait for it to appear publicly)
Maybe you'll get lucky and Le Stag will release it today, like he did for the previous update (ie Monday public release). Otherwise, there's always tomorrow. ;)

Looks like this is a two-parter, and with a name such as "Look at Me", I guess we can expect at least some naughty pics inside (shocking, I know :ROFLMAO:).
 
4.10 star(s) 170 Votes