Ifllslonly
Member
- Oct 17, 2023
- 124
- 380
- 138
I'm not talking about preferences in this case. If something is objectively attractive - it is objectively attractive. The more attractive it is, the less people argue about it in the first place.That happens to people. I have a theory that they're heavily divided by in-built perception differences, and somehow one picture is really attractive to one perception group, while absolutely plain to another, no matter their personal beforehand experience... So different people can have different tastes no only based on their life, but by just being born different and not having some bodily reactions triggered by a subject, that will however get a reaction from another. And all that can also be traced consistently by analyzing people and grouping them, which would result in being able to scientifically judge if something will be interesting to you or not. Fascinating stuff, truly![]()
So you agree with me. But I don't think the problem is that we don't know personality. That logic can't work if we're just talking about the concept of art. I just don't like this character design, that's all.I get what you mean, but to me if feels like the issue is we don't know their personalities, which makes the art feel hollow.
I mean, between guy in the middle and girl or right, I would choose guy in the middle and I am straight. I think that says something.
Last edited: