That idea was rejected back in 2019: https://f95zone.to/threads/good-reviewer-role.25643/post-1597294Finally, as discussed many times elsewhere, the review system is also fairly uninformative. Too many people just wanna show support for the game and give 5 stars without thought. And there appears to be a lot of bots/paid-reviewers leaving 5 stars. And not enough people take the time to leave a constructive criticism review and leave any score other than 5 stars.
Here is my suggestion to help with many of the discussed issues:
a "Certified Community Reviewer" role.
- They are vetted and elected by f95 staff
- To apply, they must have X reviews and Y time as a member.
- Reviews they make get a "Certified Review" badge.
- Users who are game devs can likewise get a "Certified Game Dev Review" badge
- Reviews can be filtered to only show Certified reviews
- The role can be revoked if the user has been absent for a long time
Here is my second suggestion:
Allow users to upvote reviews. Here is an example from Steam:
View attachment 2245925
No, it is the dev deciding how their versioning work, and unfortunately that often means numbers put randomly.Unfortunately, this is not the case atm on f95. Unifying update numbers is also subjective on the part of the uploaders.
Which would make it useless, and once again, the number of updates is meaningless.An "automated update-version numbering system" would also just be another way of saying "total number of updates." Devs could post many, small updates to make their game look more complete than it actually is.