- Mar 23, 2017
- 105
- 1,490
NSFW AI chatbots
- Thread starter Princess Groundhog
- Start date
- May 1, 2021
- 165
- 511
From what I looked around, JanitorAI still seems to be the only no BS, no fees smut AI.
Yeah, others have bells and whistles, but the feeling that they are trying to rip me off never left.
Yeah, others have bells and whistles, but the feeling that they are trying to rip me off never left.
- May 28, 2020
- 208
- 553
- Nov 5, 2018
- 1,319
- 3,218
What?! Dude... I just tried this and DeepSeek is AMAZING... omg its so good, the descriptions were so raunchy it made me laugh out loud... This is so far above anything I have tried thus far.... CHYYYNA FTW XD
- Jul 7, 2017
- 1,448
- 2,951
Thanks, but the guide looks complicated to use on OpenRouter.AI and have a daily token limit. I will keep using Kindroid and JanitorAI since I'm satisfied with smut as it is.
Last edited:
- Jul 7, 2017
- 1,448
- 2,951
- Jun 26, 2017
- 659
- 1,182
The best way to use AI chats (IMO):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I just looked at the installation process for ST and there are a lot of suspicious cmd prompts and getting around windows security required to install this software. Even telling you to install in folders not monitored by windows.
Why would this be the case? Can you confirm there are no scams or malicious codes being installed as well?
- Jun 26, 2017
- 659
- 1,182
00
ST is one of the most popular services for AI chatbots.There's an active Reddit community with over 35k members, numerous Discord channels, and even Venus, a paid competitor, links Sillytavern all over the website. There is a tag for bots designed for ST (Tho, you can use any card, doesn't really matter) and if you hover over the download option, it specifically states that it's compatible with ST.
Even if you don't want to trust me, Reddit or Venus, then what about Openrouter? Although it's open source, it is a commercial service that had to come to some sort of deal with companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in order to host their API keys. Google even uses Openrouter to test new AI models.
If you browse through models, you can find sections on the model page that lists the most popular apps used with that model. If you select a popular chat model, like
That's a reasonable question. ST uses Windows Powershell, it's mostly to do with Git integration nonsense that I don't fully understand, but the fact that ST is open-source means that anyone can see the code at anytime. Thus, if there were some sort of malicious code it likely would have been discovered.
ST is one of the most popular services for AI chatbots.There's an active Reddit community with over 35k members, numerous Discord channels, and even Venus, a paid competitor, links Sillytavern all over the website. There is a tag for bots designed for ST (Tho, you can use any card, doesn't really matter) and if you hover over the download option, it specifically states that it's compatible with ST.
Even if you don't want to trust me, Reddit or Venus, then what about Openrouter? Although it's open source, it is a commercial service that had to come to some sort of deal with companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in order to host their API keys. Google even uses Openrouter to test new AI models.
If you browse through models, you can find sections on the model page that lists the most popular apps used with that model. If you select a popular chat model, like
You must be registered to see the links
, you can see that ST is ranked 4th currently. The fact that ST is engraved into the same AI echosystem as Openrouter, OpenAI and so forth kind of speaks for itself no?Alright, your arguments are ones I have also considered but I thought better be safe and ask about it. I installed it but did not expect how complex it was, this is going to be a steep learning curve... Maybe some youtube tutorials are in order. Software looks impressive though.
- Jun 26, 2017
- 659
- 1,182
Totally fair. Security is important after all.
As for the complexity, I wouldn't recommend overthinking it. The software contains a lot of stuff for power users, but it can easily be used for casual use. I've been using it for months now, and only just started messing around with some of the more complex stuff recently. It will generally work directly out of the box, and there are plenty of useful presets available to avoid some of the more fine-tuning options. As long as you have the API key setup properly, then realistically all you need to do is grab a card, set up a persona and your golden.
The AI Chat Bot community runs pretty deep. It can be easy to fall into a rabbit hole of stuff that you'll realistically never need to know for most use cases.
Yeah, I appreciate the power of the software but this is anything but "casual" which I would consider to be something like JanitorAI or SpicyChat. Having to integrate various elements from multiple different websites into a UI that looks like the cockpit of 747 jetliner is the opposite of casual. Even the installation process was more complicated than 90% of the software I use on a daily basis. I could easily see many people taking one look at this and going nope... too much hassle. They even say on their own website that the learning curve is "part of the fun." I mean yes for some people and no for others. I personally don't mind a difficult learning curve if it results in a better experience for a hobby that I enjoy, but make no mistake, this is orders of magnitude more complex than anything I have tried thus far.
Surprised no mentions of crushon here, I've used it for a while and while it definitely has some annoyances, it's unlimited free chat. I tend to make my own characters for it. The most frustrating thing is the characters can get stuck in being very repetitive in which case you usually have to start a new chat. Otherwise for being a free service that requires no time for personal setup, it's pretty good.
- May 28, 2020
- 208
- 553
You must be registered to see the links
I'm gonna post this again. Since this is a pirate site, let's go with a free method to get access to various LLM models. Pick a model. Get the reverse proxy. Keep the tab open and running while you chat. Use the reverse proxy on your favorite site like JanitorAI, chub, venus, etc. I don't have SillyTavern, but I'm sure it works there too.
- Jan 8, 2022
- 504
- 1,342
For anyone who might be wondering and interested, the free version of cosmoRP is back again, though with limit this time. You have 250 credits per day. And around 3k or 4k of used tokens cost you circa one credit.
- Jun 26, 2017
- 659
- 1,182
There is nothing piracy related with Colab. It's 100% a legit service offered by Google and used to be the meta for using AI for free. However, it's sort of an outdated option, but not necessarily a horrible one. The main problem is that Local LLMs will always be weaker than paid options (or those free through Openrouter). The main benefits for local models are no censorship, total privacy and no cost.
However, when you use Colab, you're losing some of the benefits. The way Colab works, is that you're borrowing a GPU from a Google server. There are actually a few services like this out there, but Google is the only one that offers limited free use. That's where the first problem is. Colab isn't totally free, there is daily usage caps. Those caps are fairly decent, and can be extended by using lower context sizes and lesser powerful models, but by doing that, you're further limiting the already under-powered local models.
The second significant drawback is privacy. Since this is a Google service, there's no telling what sort of information they're getting from you. Running a service like this for free would be extremely expensive. They must be making their money back someway.
As long as you're aware of the drawbacks to using local LLMs and Colab, it's 100% an okay option.