anonsuit
Well-Known Member
- Nov 24, 2019
- 1,055
- 862
- 236
I dislike it. I find it quite illogical. anything in the line of I do this for the bull but not for the cuck just pisses me off. mostly for one reason.In one of the preview pics, she insists the cuck to use a condom which might mean it might be like Survival Mission Z. Suprised how little this dynamic is used in NTR. A bull convincing the cuck’s wife/gf to do it raw when the cuck can’t go raw is a criminally underrated and underused way to keep the NTR going after the FMC already agrees to have sex with the bull.
it is unprompted.
this takes me out of the fiction, your partner does not have sex with your character because I do not want to put resources into drawing your character having sex with her, only the bad guy gets to have sex.
now it can be done well. when the antagonist. prompts the girl into rejecting the guy. but that needs that you as a player have the mechanics to bed your girl. same with the condom thing. when you move the relationship more towards disrespect towards the protagonists.
but 90% of the time. all equivalent behaviors are just born out of saving development cost. so I do not like it, because i have never seen it implemented logically in a narrative sense.
for example King of summer, has the girl have plenty of sex with the protagonist. and eventually drop him. that was one of the kinda well executed examples. the protagonist get scenes. and eventually it is established why they stop.