one-star ratings

1.00 star(s) 1 Vote

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
10,620
15,601
To my own surprise, I only gave a one star rating once.

I thought that it was more, but looking back at my rating, I always found something positive that deserved a second star, except once. And I would probably have gave a 0 star rating to that game if it was possible, because it was really the demonstration of void made game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arabi1

Advent Games

Living Together! with Imouto
Game Developer
Jun 6, 2023
187
441
I am skeptical. If we're talking about real dedication I think most people could offer a decent short story kinetic novel with a rudimentary engine (something super simple) and as long as it doesn't crash for some unknown reason every 2 minutes it would probably be worth 2 stars.

The real mistake most would-be porn devs seem to make is biting off more than they can chew and trying to "fake it 'till they make it" out of raw greed. I am seriously considering trying to make my own game that focuses on realistic goals. I feel like a half decent plot, an hour's worth of content, and half-way decent artwork would be met with 3 stars on average.
Most of us do not make a living out of this, let alone doing it for greed. There'd be other stuff we'd be doing if it were just for greed xD
 

hoshimota

Active Member
Sep 18, 2023
656
1,586
I am skeptical. If we're talking about real dedication I think most people could offer a decent short story kinetic novel with a rudimentary engine (something super simple) and as long as it doesn't crash for some unknown reason every 2 minutes it would probably be worth 2 stars.

The real mistake most would-be porn devs seem to make is biting off more than they can chew and trying to "fake it 'till they make it" out of raw greed. I am seriously considering trying to make my own game that focuses on realistic goals. I feel like a half decent plot, an hour's worth of content, and half-way decent artwork would be met with 3 stars on average.
I mean I think there is also an element of not understanding what there is a lot of demand for / building what they personally like and want to work on rather than what will be popular.
 

Cartman-Brah

Member
Jul 8, 2024
140
228
this is something I would never do. i usually play games from genres i like and no matter what the quality is, if i enjoyed it i give it 5 stars. i wouldn't waste time with a 1 star quality game for me anyway. i think game reviews are overrated
 

gunderson

Member
Aug 17, 2016
358
627
Most of the time, I don't review a game at all if it sucks. I delete it, wipe the space in my brain that remembers most of it beyond just enough specifics to avoid it in the future if it ends up getting updates, and move on. So my ratings tend to heavily favor giving games 4-5 stars rather than giving games 1 star. I don't know if this is common practice among players, but I'd guess that it isn't uncommon.

As such, I think it's important for people to be able to give 1 star reviews if only because a shitty game they got for free made that much of an impression on them. If their review as a result is low-effort and/or breaks the rules because they had an issue with a tag or something else stupid, report their review. It's not hard to do. But if they had legitimate problems with your game and just happen to think it deserved 1 star, then players should have the right to have their opinion heard in the review section for your game so others can consider what they had to say.

In almost all cases, f95 should preference the players' needs over the devs,' which means that we should tend toward not pruning reviews solely because they're 1 star. This is, as ever, a porn game piracy site rather than a porn game advertisement site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arabi1

Zardoz23

Member
Jan 28, 2021
244
657
Most of us do not make a living out of this, let alone doing it for greed. There'd be other stuff we'd be doing if it were just for greed xD
That's fair. I don't think I worded that particularly well. My main point about biting off more than they can chew stands however. I genuinely think setting realistic goals is the number one issue for most of these new porn devs. It's like they want to create their magnum opus on their first game. That's not how art works, and yes game development is an art, you don't start with Mona Lisa you start with Lisa Simpson.

The weird thing is I think this also applies to the experienced devs who are making a living on patreon. Surely every successfully finished game you add to your catalog will only increase your popularity and clout in the adult game sphere (assuming it meets a certain standard of quality of course). Are they really that afraid their subscribers will disappear when they announce the next game they are working on? Some maybe but having proof that you're a dev who can finish a project will attract more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arabi1

Advent Games

Living Together! with Imouto
Game Developer
Jun 6, 2023
187
441
That's fair. I don't think I worded that particularly well. My main point about biting off more than they can chew stands however. I genuinely think setting realistic goals is the number one issue for most of these new porn devs. It's like they want to create their magnum opus on their first game. That's not how art works, and yes game development is an art, you don't start with Mona Lisa you start with Lisa Simpson.

The weird thing is I think this also applies to the experienced devs who are making a living on patreon. Surely every successfully finished game you add to your catalog will only increase your popularity and clout in the adult game sphere (assuming it meets a certain standard of quality of course). Are they really that afraid their subscribers will disappear when they announce the next game they are working on? Some maybe but having proof that you're a dev who can finish a project will attract more.
Yes, overpromising happens a lot here. I think, though, it's not done nefariously. The devs are overpromising to themselves as well that they'll do all these cool things they really want to implement. The genuine will is there, but then the realities of development kicks in. Everything takes a long time and a lot of energy/money/both.

As for patrons/subscribers, it is the case that this highly fluctuates and is dependent on the developer churning out the content people want to see. Very popular devs can get away with not bringing out updates and/or other content for longer but that's just a percentages game of how many subscribers leave vs. how much in absolute money they're still receiving. If I were to lose 25% of my subscribers I would be forced to cut corners on expenses, if darkcookie lost 25% of their subs they'd still be in good shape to keep up the quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arabi1
Jul 15, 2024
10
191
Well just because one gives a one-star rating, even to everything they have consumed, does not necessarily mean they are uh... 'dicks'. Maybe some of them have actual constructive criticisms to give. Even if its not constructive, so what? Its the internet after all.
 

GNVE

Active Member
Jul 20, 2018
723
1,182
Well just because one gives a one-star rating, even to everything they have consumed, does not necessarily mean they are uh... 'dicks'. Maybe some of them have actual constructive criticisms to give. Even if its not constructive, so what? Its the internet after all.
If every rating you give is 1 star you do not want to give constructive criticism. (Unless you have like given two ratings) Even if your standards are so high you hate everything you play on here, you would still give occasional two or even three stars to differentiate quality.
 
Jul 15, 2024
10
191
Disagreed. There are all sorts of individuals. Though I assume those who do give one star ratings here are either trolls or something similar but eh who knows. Though I do agree to an extent. Individuals of that nature are quite rare.
 

GNVE

Active Member
Jul 20, 2018
723
1,182
Disagreed. There are all sorts of individuals. Though I assume those who do give one star ratings here are either trolls or something similar but eh who knows. Though I do agree to an extent. Individuals of that nature are quite rare.
Okay it seems like you are saying that there are people who put their hand on a hot stove every week, being surprised it hurts and loudly complaining that fire == hot. If you don't like an activity you stop doing it.
 

peterppp

Active Member
Mar 5, 2020
693
1,187
Disagreed. There are all sorts of individuals. Though I assume those who do give one star ratings here are either trolls or something similar but eh who knows. Though I do agree to an extent. Individuals of that nature are quite rare.
if someone is a serious reviewer and think every game is a 1 star, they would stop playing the games. it makes no sense to keep playing games of a type you obviously don't like. it's like keep going to vegan restaurants, giving them all 1 star because you hate vegan food.
 

Zardoz23

Member
Jan 28, 2021
244
657
if someone is a serious reviewer and think every game is a 1 star, they would stop playing the games. it makes no sense to keep playing games of a type you obviously don't like. it's like keep going to vegan restaurants, giving them all 1 star because you hate vegan food.
Let's take the "serious reviewer" out of the equation for a minute. I think at some point in our lives we've all known someone who inexplicably makes themselves miserable on a regular basis. The kind of person that rages at minor inconveniences they could have mitigated if they had just given it some thought beforehand. But they keep doing the same shit week after week.

It's probably some kind of emotional or intellectual disability for some of them. But there are plenty of miserable bastards out there who's sole purpose in life seems to be bitching and moaning. I guess out of the millions of people in the world at least a few of them would direct their ire at reviewing shitty games. Perhaps it qualifies as a weird kink.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PsychicStress

Pretentious Goblin

Devoted Member
Nov 3, 2017
8,795
7,364
Giving out only 1- and 5-star reviews is a sign of an immature mind with no sense of moderation. Like, even games I hated, I've given them 2 stars because there was something in them that kept them from being completely worthless. The only worthless games are asset-flips with no artistic value whatsoever, like those "games" shat out by 13-year-olds on Steam Greenlight as a joke. Either that or if the game just flat-out doesn't work.
 

Cartman-Brah

Member
Jul 8, 2024
140
228
immature mind with no sense of moderation
No one has to be a master critic. Writing a 2,000-word review of a game that you spent only 1 hour on and giving it 2 or 3 stars doesn't make anyone a master reviewer. Similarly, giving a game 5 stars just because you love it and have fun doesn't mean you have an immature mind. we are all here to play games and have some fun. you can't insult people's minds over a petty voting system.
 
1.00 star(s) 1 Vote