- Oct 1, 2017
- 825
- 2,621
I had played a lot of variations of the game so they might all be melding together, but I'm pretty sure they don't have to be an official couple.But they talking about a threesome not only happen when they are a couple?
I had played a lot of variations of the game so they might all be melding together, but I'm pretty sure they don't have to be an official couple.But they talking about a threesome not only happen when they are a couple?
Of course, but the comment I was responding to implied that Ian x Lena x Jeremy wouldn't be possible if Lena committed to the relationship with Ian (because she can't commit if she's fucking Jeremy). I merely clarified that it could be a temporary setback and Lena might still have a chance with Jeremy even in the committed relationship with Ian if he proposes him as a third for a threesome. This way Jeremy doesn't break his bro code (if your bro gives his blessing, it doesn't count, right?) and Lena could satisfy her BBC curiosity without cheating. And this way Lena wouldn't even have to keep Jeremy and Louise together because it's much easier to do a threesome with a single Jeremy than to think of justifications of them doing it to Louise.I think Ian doesn't have to be in couple with Lena for Ian/Lena/Jeremy to be possible, they can do it by leaving the relationship casual.
Me too. Hope stan will get something in this updateUnpopular opinion, but I hope Stan gets it in this update.
Unpopular opinion, but I hope Stan gets it in this update.
How about a rope?Me too. Hope stan will get something in this update
A strap-on in his ass?Unpopular opinion, but I hope Stan gets it in this update.
Lena and Louise can build their own Eiffel tower.A strap-on in his ass?![]()
A bullet in the head from a cop who stopped him from committing a mass shooting?Me too. Hope stan will get something in this update
Thanks for the explanation, unfortunately I don't have time now to read the whole thread.Of course, but the comment I was responding to implied that Ian x Lena x Jeremy wouldn't be possible if Lena committed to the relationship with Ian (because she can't commit if she's fucking Jeremy). I merely clarified that it could be a temporary setback and Lena might still have a chance with Jeremy even in the committed relationship with Ian if he proposes him as a third for a threesome. This way Jeremy doesn't break his bro code (if your bro gives his blessing, it doesn't count, right?) and Lena could satisfy her BBC curiosity without cheating. And this way Lena wouldn't even have to keep Jeremy and Louise together because it's much easier to do a threesome with a single Jeremy than to think of justifications of them doing it to Louise.
Stan will have a lot of content ...with his hand.Me too. Hope stan will get something in this update
While Lena x Stan would definitely happen, Ch. 11 is too early for that. Even if it does, they won't go all the way to 3rd base.I would not be shocked if we actually do get Lena x Stan in Ch 11 after what happened in 10. When the game was early on I really didn’t think that would be a route.
She doesn't. Also, it's funny how everytime I come back to this thread there are less and less comments. There seems to have been a great purge going on.How does Eva explain that Lena is refusing a serious relationship with Ian if she fully scored with Jeremy.
Wait a few weeks and thread will explode with discussions.She doesn't. Also, it's funny how everytime I come back to this thread there are less and less comments. There seems to have been a great purge going on.
I think it will depend on how you've played Lena. If she has an OF, then there could be some form of sexual content (remeber he's already masturbated onto Lena), but if it's a modest Lena, I doubt it.While Lena x Stan would definitely happen, Ch. 11 is too early for that. Even if it does, they won't go all the way to 3rd base.
I don't know if Eva has directly commented on this, but the explanation I've seen bandied about is that the other two people Lena could be seeing (Robert and Mike) aren't that integrated into Lena and Ian's friend groups, so official changes to Lena and Ian's relationship status wouldn't be too hard to accommodate when accounting for those characters.Thanks for the explanation, unfortunately I don't have time now to read the whole thread.
Btw, I have a question. How does Eva explain that Lena is refusing a serious relationship with Ian if she fully scored with Jeremy?
I read various theories here, for example that after Jeremy, Lena confirms the path of corruption and she is not interested in relationships.I don't know if Eva has directly commented on this, but the explanation I've seen bandied about is that the other two people Lena could be seeing (Robert and Mike) aren't that integrated into Lena and Ian's friend groups, so official changes to Lena and Ian's relationship status wouldn't be too hard to accommodate when accounting for those characters.
Jeremy, on the other hand, is involved in both friend groups, and Eva would have to juggle a lot of storylines and character interactions going forward if she let Lena x Ian be official and Lena x Jeremy happen at the same time this early in the game.
I don't know if that's the actual reason, or if Eva just decided Lena as a character wouldn't do that to Ian if she had a fling with Jeremy (i.e., Lena's hypocritical, but wouldn't go that far).
This is the only negative in this game for me. Lena's other options are absolutely terrible. I particularly loathe Robert. I absolutely hate it that he is the only one who gets decent vaginal creampie scenes too.Random thought, I really liked playing Ashley in GGGB as an ethical slut, but it's difficult to play Lena this way (unless you're focused on the lesbian side). Robert feels too manipulative IMO, Mike (would be) a cheater, and Jeremy is iffy at best. It's actually easier to play an ethical rake with Ian, you can get with Lena, Allison, and Cherry without being too much of a dick.
Out of curiosity, I took a look at Lena's internal monologue when she turns Ian down. She says to herself:I read various theories here, for example that after Jeremy, Lena confirms the path of corruption and she is not interested in relationships.
From a moral point of view, such writing makes Lena very hypocritical, because she fucks with her friend's boyfriend, but at the same time she worries about her relationship with Ian. You're right, it's also selfish, she's thinking to herself.Out of curiosity, I took a look at Lena's internal monologue when she turns Ian down. She says to herself:You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Putting aside the out-of-game explanation of Eva not wanting to make things even more complicated, from an in-game perspective, that internal monologue doesn't 100% fit my speculation about Lena not wanting to hurt Ian. Bringing Louise into it tells me that Lena's more worried about the consequences to herself, although I'm sure Ian's feelings play a role.
I also don't think her thoughts easily fit the corruption angle and not being interested in relationships, as this reaction indicates interest mixed with the fear of being caught and its consequences, instead of disinterest. I could see why people would believe this indicates a corruption path though. If there is such a path, I'd think it'd start with hooking up with Mike.