mommysboiii

Engaged Member
Oct 17, 2019
2,205
4,271
I've advanced a little further into the story.

So: Lena agreed to have a threesome with Axel and Cherry in the past. There is a possibility for Jeremy, Ivy, Louise and Lena to have fun together...

Why the fuck is the MAIN male character the only one that can't have that? This shit tilts me so much. And I hate how in these games the authors always like to retroactively put more baggage on to the main love interest.

"Yeah, I had a threesome with him. I also had a gangbang for Blacked.com. Ah, and there was the time I serviced the entire 88th Marine Corps regiment and let them run a train on me."

For the love of God.
ladys and gentlemen and today the I word award goes to PervySageKem POG POG POG congratulations SIR

giphy (1).gif giphy.gif
 

BloodyMares

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2017
1,460
7,025
So: Lena agreed to have a threesome with Axel and Cherry in the past. There is a possibility for Jeremy, Ivy, Louise and Lena to have fun together...
Spoiler: This possibility doesn't end well for Louise. Ivy and Jeremy might have fun, but Louise dumps his ass and hates Ivy to no end. She would never, ever, want to cross paths with those 2 again.
 

Virux

Newbie
Aug 13, 2017
39
9
Hello everyone.
I only have one question. Now that Chapter 9 is out, the next update will be the revamping of all 9 chapers right?
 

monk_56

Active Member
Apr 26, 2021
673
2,775
Forum dwellers being so negative. Just assuming the worst outcomes. When has Eva let people down?

Dev wants to get her game nice and polished for a Steam release and as foundation for the rest of the game- let her do her thing; the game will be better for it.

I'm not gonna lie and say redoing the Stan route or Seymour scenes will bring me any joy at all- but I'm optimistic there will be some components I like as well.

Maybe we will get some stronger non-corruption content on Lena- or the some of the Ian art will be improved, or the routing will be less rigid. ;)
 

PervySageKem

Active Member
Apr 12, 2020
509
676
Forum dwellers being so negative. Just assuming the worst outcomes. When has Eva let people down?

Dev wants to get her game nice and polished for a Steam release and as foundation for the rest of the game- let her do her thing; the game will be better for it.

I'm not gonna lie and say redoing the Stan route or Seymour scenes will bring me any joy at all- but I'm optimistic there will be some components I like as well.

Maybe we will get some stronger non-corruption content on Lena- or the some of the Ian art will be improved, or the routing will be less rigid. ;)
Let us hope
 
  • Hey there
Reactions: monk_56

bauman

Active Member
Sep 11, 2018
612
2,776
Forum dwellers being so negative. Just assuming the worst outcomes. When has Eva let people down?

Dev wants to get her game nice and polished for a Steam release and as foundation for the rest of the game- let her do her thing; the game will be better for it.

I'm not gonna lie and say redoing the Stan route or Seymour scenes will bring me any joy at all- but I'm optimistic there will be some components I like as well.

Maybe we will get some stronger non-corruption content on Lena- or the some of the Ian art will be improved, or the routing will be less rigid. ;)
She let people down when she scrapped the promised third post-release update for GGGB to work on ORS. But yeah -- Eva Kiss is one of the most reliable devs out there, and even jokingly mentioning her in the same league as Ics*** should be a bannable offense. :)
 

lipe2410

Forum Fanatic
Dec 23, 2018
5,094
19,605
I last play this game a long time ago and I want to get back into it. I've read that is getting revamped. Should I wait or just play now? Do you guys know when is the revamp coming out?
No date yet. Is completly worthy play right now but have in mind that probaly all of us will have to repaly because there will be some additional arts in some scenes, improved old arts and one non-playable character will be completely reworked
 
Nov 15, 2020
418
1,882
I don't how the author continually used Ivy as a way to keep retroactvely changing Lena's past, adding more and more baggage to it, but I guess it's fine. You can ignore it pretty easily.
I don't see it as retroactively changing her past, rather that her (and Ian's) background is gradually revealed as we move forward with the story. Even though they're the protagonists, there's a lot we don't know about them. I think that makes sense particularly when it comes to their previous relationships; for obvious reasons they don't want to dwell on the details, so we don't get to know everything even if we've got access to their inner monologue.

Still it's more present for Lena because both Axel and Cherry are still around. I don't think we know any details about Ian's breakup: who Gillian cheated with; how it happened; or how Ian found out. Maybe it won't be relevant and we'll never learn about it, but I could also see it becoming a topic later on (particularly if he experiences something similar again).

In a way the details about their strained relationships with their parents was similar; it's a personal topic, and seemingly not something they are content to talk about with anyone — so we didn't learn the details until Ian and Lena had gotten to know each other better after several chapters.
 

PervySageKem

Active Member
Apr 12, 2020
509
676
I don't see it as retroactively changing her past, rather that her (and Ian's) background is gradually revealed as we move forward with the story. Even though they're the protagonists, there's a lot we don't know about them. I think that makes sense particularly when it comes to their previous relationships; for obvious reasons they don't want to dwell on the details, so we don't get to know everything even if we've got access to their inner monologue.

Still it's more present for Lena because both Axel and Cherry are still around. I don't think we know any details about Ian's breakup: who Gillian cheated with; how it happened; or how Ian found out. Maybe it won't be relevant and we'll never learn about it, but I could also see it becoming a topic later on (particularly if he experiences something similar again).

In a way the details about their strained relationships with their parents was similar; it's a personal topic, and seemingly not something they are content to talk about with anyone — so we didn't learn the details until Ian and Lena had gotten to know each other better after several chapters.
Yeah, I get that. It's just it seemed a little forced. Like, the detail of the threesomes before being revealed of a cheating situation added nothing to the fact that he cheated on her. The backstory should've been just that, he cheated on her.

I found adding details out of the blue, like Ivy saying "oh yeah, we made out all the time" or "we did this all the time" and the whole "yeah, I had a bunch of threesomes with him", doesn't really expand on the character. If there was a need to show Lena was interested in those types of stuff, there could've been another context without just saying she had already done it. Like telling Holly or Ian or Ivy "I'm actually interested in trying things with other girls".

It seems the only reason the whole Cherry threesome thing was added was to give a justification why Lena won't accept a threesome or other type of situation in the future, because the thing that made her hate Axel was the fact he was already fucking Cherry before the threesome (exactly Ian's situation).
 
4.60 star(s) 324 Votes