I fear it is because you appear to not understand the point you're replying to. Specifically, fast-forwarding to this:I think you both dont listen to my points
...you're talking about something quite different from what lipe2410 said:and this is my point if you do everything in your hand with both lena and ian to make holly go down the corruption path(which would not be out of nowhere if you activly make the choice)than it should lead you down this path even if you are in a relationship because it is the player that choose this path like with all other npcs in her old game were it was possible too
They are saying that doing choices which don't create/promote corruption shouldn't result in this character unexplainably getting corrupted. You in turn say that doing choices which do promote corruption should result in corruption. Bot of these are like, "Well, DUH" and you are talking of two different things, two different takes on how to interact with NPCs, including MC's partner. There's no conflict between your two stances (in the sense being able to do it one way doesn't mean the option to do it the other way must be removed)But the other girls are NPC's, we don't control them, they simply react to our choices. If our choices is towards love/romance 100% of the time, we can't expect that this leads to a corruption/slut outcome out of nowhere.
Last edited: