- Jun 15, 2017
- 52
- 206
Alright, I give you that. I should've put more thoughts into it. It's not my thing to have sex with no attachments so I may have been to quick to judge. Thanks for clarifying.So, for one saying that someone who just wants to have sex with no strings attached is automatically objectifying the person that they are interested in having said sex with is such a nuclear take for me. Wanting to have a casual sex relationship with someone doesn't necessitate treating or viewing such person solely as a sexual object. Sure, some people may act like this, but it is perfectly possible to just fuck someone one, two or multiple number of times, and still see them as a human being and respect them. Same goes for relationships such as 'fuck buddies'. Human relationships are a complicated thing, and I think that your view on said subject is very reductive.
Ok, I understand but again, I don't have an issue with her wanting to fool around and again it's not my thing, I don't like it but the way she was playing the field didn't fit right with me after I learned a bit more about her. It's not a matter of relationship, friendship or whatever and also I never said that she needs someone's permission to do so. Like I said before, I'd rather have a deeper emotional bond with someone first. And my opinion on that isn't just for girls, I don't like Don Juan either, so no, I'm not biased because I'm a man.For two your disgust with the way that Alison acted is really weird to me. Why shouldn't she sent those messages to Jeremy while also pursuing a sex relationship with Ian? It's not like she and Ian are dating or anything. She wants to get laid so she is maximizing the chance of said thing happening by flirting with more than one guy at the same time. Ian being her 'first choice' may just mean that she prefers him over Jeremy in some way, not that she literally had to text him first for that to be true.
That being said, someone mentioned some facts that I was unaware of so I might want to re-explore her route some other time but right now I'd rather focus on other routes that would fit more with my own personal moral values.
Concerning Ivy, well I'll never change my mind on the topic of sex workers. Those who have the choice simply sells their dignity for money, those that don't have a choice is different of course. Sure they can do whatever they want but that doesn't change the fact that I'll think they don't have dignity (and I'm sure they don't care about what I think about them)
It's a bit off topic but the way sex workers and sexuality are being glorified/promoted in MSM, I don't like it and I don't think it's very healthy for children that are so easily exposed to some extreme degree of depravity but anyway... I'm pretty sure we won't ever agree on that topic so I suppose we should agree to disagree.
Thanks for the explanation. Well since you managed to make me see things from another point of view and make me change my mind on that topic, I guess I don't fit that kind of definition, right ?For four, by saying that you sound like a 2015 pop-feminist from tumblr, I meant that you writing about objectification of people by just wanting to have a 'no strings attached' sex with them is something that I would normally associate with a certain type of people active on tumblr a few years ago, that were talking about how viewing someone as just a person that you would like to have sex with is objectification. In other words pop-feminists. People that are more concerned with aesthetics of feminism than really liberating people from oppressive gender roles.
Yeah, well I owe you an apology. I was sarcastic because some group of people tend to call other people names without even knowing them. So I might have misjudged you, sorry.For five, I am glad that you liked my profile pic . I will make sure to call you a homophobe if I ever see you taking homophobic stuff in this thread.
Feel free to spy on me but trust me, you won't have the chance to call me that.
Nah, thank you for replying, I like this kind of message way more than what you previously posted.Thanks for reading my blogpost.