PilotLara sorry to bother, but there's what seems like a minor bug/inconsistency in Chapter 7:
Python:
"{image=icon_lust.webp}Flirty comment" if v5_cindy_nude > 1 and ian_lust > 4:
$ renpy.block_rollback()
$ v7_cindy_pics = 2
i "{i}They're spectacular, Cindy. Even better than the first ones{/i}."
"It was hard typing with just one hand."
c "{i}Right? I like these a lot more!{/i}"
i "{i}You look a lot more comfortable. And that black bodysuit looks great on you... Though it seems like it's coming off {image=emoji_flirt.webp}{/i}"
if v5_cindy_nude == 2:
c "{i}Yeah, we did some nude shots too, like last time... {image=emoji_shy.webp}{image=emoji_shy.webp}{/i}"
elif v5_cindy_nude == 1:
c "{i}Yeah, we did some nude shots too at the end... {image=emoji_shy.webp}{/i}"
i "{i}Completely nude? Not just topless like last time?{/i}"
c "{i}Yeah {image=emoji_shy.webp}{image=emoji_shy.webp}{/i}"
else:
c "{i}Yeah, we did some nude shots too at the end... {image=emoji_shy.webp}{/i}"
i "{i}No way!{/i}"
c "{i}Yeah {image=emoji_shy.webp}{image=emoji_shy.webp}{/i}"
This menu option is only enabled when
v5_cindy_nude
equals 2, i.e. if the first photo session with Cindy ended up with completely nude shots, but the branch content is capable of handling other variants as well, so perhaps the requirement here should be relaxed/removed, leaving Ian's lust attribute as primary factor?
At the least, allowing this option if the first session ended with topless shots (
v5_cindy_nude > 0
) would create a nice sense of progression for Cindy/Ian (going from being topless in front of him, to sending him nudes)