- May 9, 2020
- 1,016
- 3,145
Only needing 6 lust is kinda low tho nglApparently Lena's lust is taken into consideration in the checks:
View attachment 2980322
Only needing 6 lust is kinda low tho nglApparently Lena's lust is taken into consideration in the checks:
View attachment 2980322
I think the checks should be reversed, it doesn't make sense that if Ian and Lena are a couple you need Lena to have already cheated to respond positively to his compliment and for actually do the fucking high lust is enough. It doesn't affect if you are able to cheat with Jack or not, because you need the positive response to the compliment for Jack to propose sex at the end of the night. But still, it feels weird.Alternatively, this option is something EK implemented initially, but then changed their mind about it being an option. I mean, people are already complaining how Lena goes for a guy she's barely just met, they'd blow their gasket twice as hard if she could start her cheating on Ian with it.
Peeking in the game script, there's actually leftover from faithful Lena giving in. It has a higher lust requirement, 8+Only needing 6 lust is kinda low tho ngl
if lena_jack == 2 and v9_axel_sex == False:
// ...
jk "Hey, babe... I was hoping you'd join me for that glass of champagne after all."
menu:
"{image=icon_sad.webp}I have a boyfriend..." if ian_lena_couple:
// ...
l "Yeah, about that... I have a boyfriend, you see..."
jk "And I should be concerned about that because...?"
if lena_cheating:
l "Because I shouldn't cheat on him..."
jk "Come on, you and I both know that's not something you're really worried about. I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time."
l "And what makes you think that?"
jk "Let's just say I have a sixth sense for that kind of thing. I recognize an adventurous girl when I see one."
else:
l "Because I'm not about to cheat on him with a guy who I just met."
jk "Is that your way of asking me to convince you?"
jk "I can play that game, but we both know you're up for a little adventure. Something you can't get from your boyfriend..."
jk "So, are you brave enough to go for what you want?"
menu:
"{image=icon_lust.webp}Cheat on Ian" if lena_cheating or lena_lust > 7:
// ...
lena_jack
to 2 in the initial conversation with faithful Lena. So, yeah, we're back to question if it's a bug or something intentional. Maybe PilotLara knows!Ian is "Sigma on grind". And now in sex scenes his body is used too(Lena thinking about Ian's body musculature while having sex in threesome with Louise and now in Epilogue too). Ian is constantly hitting gym, preparing for tournament, upgrades his wardrobe, everyone(Jeremy, Alison, Perry, Lena and other's) comments about Ian that he is getting ripped. Choked Ivy in gym session, pulls out cam automatically in epilogue. He will catch upto them in an episode or so. It's just a matter of time.Ian don't stand a chance against player alpha Jack. He totally demolished Lena in that scene. I wish Ian would be more dominant
There are two things that seem to be true for every Lena:Ian is "Sigma on grind". And now in sex scenes his body is used too(Lena thinking about Ian's body musculature while having sex in threesome with Louise and now in Epilogue too). Ian is constantly hitting gym, preparing for tournament, upgrades his wardrobe, everyone(Jeremy, Alison, Perry, Lena and other's) comments about Ian that he is getting ripped. Choked Ivy in gym session, pulls out cam automatically in epilogue. He will catch upto them in an episode or so.
The scene is intentional that Lena can only get this scenario if she is cheating.Peeking in the game script, there's actually leftover from faithful Lena giving in. It has a higher lust requirement, 8+
So, this is right now inaccessible because you can't getPython:if lena_jack == 2 and v9_axel_sex == False: // ... jk "Hey, babe... I was hoping you'd join me for that glass of champagne after all." menu: "{image=icon_sad.webp}I have a boyfriend..." if ian_lena_couple: // ... l "Yeah, about that... I have a boyfriend, you see..." jk "And I should be concerned about that because...?" if lena_cheating: l "Because I shouldn't cheat on him..." jk "Come on, you and I both know that's not something you're really worried about. I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time." l "And what makes you think that?" jk "Let's just say I have a sixth sense for that kind of thing. I recognize an adventurous girl when I see one." else: l "Because I'm not about to cheat on him with a guy who I just met." jk "Is that your way of asking me to convince you?" jk "I can play that game, but we both know you're up for a little adventure. Something you can't get from your boyfriend..." jk "So, are you brave enough to go for what you want?" menu: "{image=icon_lust.webp}Cheat on Ian" if lena_cheating or lena_lust > 7: // ...
lena_jack
to 2 in the initial conversation with faithful Lena. So, yeah, we're back to question if it's a bug or something intentional. Maybe PilotLara knows!
Right, and the question is if the conditions which limit availability of the latter scene only to cheating Lena is intentional, or an oversight, given that latter scene has bits which would trigger for Lena who is in relationship but haven't cheated on Ian before.The scene is intentional that Lena can only get this scenario if she is cheating.
Inb4 the True End for Lena turns out to be Holly who dominates her with a strap-on. (Ian can watch and rub himself in his corner)So the only real good ending for Lena, and that's kind of the main theme of the game, it's a chad Ian that loves her, dominates her and doesn't fool around because he already gets to fuck other girls during threesomes that both Ian and Lena enjoy. All the other options for her that can really satisfy her are assholes, borderline sociopaths or both.
I dont like guys like him, thats all.Ian don't stand a chance against player alpha Jack. He totally demolished Lena in that scene. I wish Ian would be more dominant
Oh my bad, I hated that scene so much i decided to erase it from my memory (not because Marcel is black but because that scene makes no sense)You get than situation with Marcel and I bet he will continue to be the worst bro ever and will tell Ian nothing.
Jack is redundant; we already have Axel; same situation with Marcel and Jeremy. Robert should have been a possible rebound guy and struck around long enough to have some conflict with Ian; that's it, no more. I don't know what function Mark is supposed to fill in regards to Lena. Now we have a forgettable new guy at the club whose number she can get (because of that liquid courage she over-poured). EK spent time trying to rehabilitate Stan's character with, as some would argue, little success. Mike, I suppose, is between Axel and Ian in terms of bad boy moral ambiguity. EK cuts Ed content (one could argue Seymour provided the old guy fetish), and Good Jess is out there somewhere in the ether, because who knows why. It's figuratively raining women for Lena now, while at the beginning, if you go full lesbian, she is woefully behind point-wise. Ivy and Holly are options, with Emma likely joining the list in the future. Louise is Lena's bitch and will remain her bitch. Cindy and Cherry are a no-go, unless on an Axel path? (pure speculation and wishful thinking on my part) The new girl at the club is a hottie and a promising addition, although admittedly to an already crowded cast. Did I forget anything summarizing the state of Lena's LI's? So much for streamlining an already complicated story, EK.I dont like guys like him, thats all.
Wish it was from his own initiative and then Lena takes an interest in him, instead of a result of her coddling him.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I don't think Lena's is going to fuck Gillian, but who knows.for more drama - Gillian
Mike is Gillian bf through.Just you watch, Lena is going to get into an FMF threesome with Gillian and her BF.
I mean Mike dating Gillian makes more sense than ever now,he is fucking around hard but never breaks up with her small breast girlfriend?Speculation at this point.