- Dec 4, 2022
- 7,003
- 64,879
The best decision because that treacherous bony ass of Gillian doesn't deserve even a handjob from IanMaybe but on 90 percent of my playthroughs my Ians get over Gillian![]()
The best decision because that treacherous bony ass of Gillian doesn't deserve even a handjob from IanMaybe but on 90 percent of my playthroughs my Ians get over Gillian![]()
Meantime Lena: cheating on Ian with everything that moves.The best decision because that treacherous bony ass of Gillian doesn't deserve even a handjob from Ian![]()
![]()
Yes. Have Lena on the Axel path and fuck him in chapter 9, but in chapter 10 she must show no interest in him. Let her play music when she is bored, masturbating and even relaxing leads to fantasize about Axel. Generally choose the worst options regarding Axel. Then she should be able to reject him at Blazer in chapter 11, so Jeremy can't know about them. In chapter 12, let her relapse to Axel and choose the best options so that they fuck before the trip. Ian doesn't suspect a thing.Hey guys, is there a way for Lena to keep it a secret her affair with Axel while dating/hooking with Ian, without Jeremy blabbing about it to the latter before the beach party?
you specifically reference men. Of course there are instances of a person (man or woman) responding badly. But you don't see any comments here saying "Alison handled that rejection really well, some women murder men after they get rejected like Jody Arias." Just because you can create a reference doesn't mean it's in any way normal or accepted.Why are you thinking that? I was quoting the user who were seemed surprised at the way Jack reacted to Lena's rejection and I said that SOME guys can react worse which can be seen if they are drunk/short tempered.
Slutty Lena has her own turn based combat.Yes. Have Lena on the Axel path and fuck him in chapter 9, but in chapter 10 she must show no interest in him. Let her play music when she is bored, masturbating and even relaxing leads to fantasize about Axel. Generally choose the worst options regarding Axel. Then she should be able to reject him at Blazer in chapter 11, so Jeremy can't know about them. In chapter 12, let her relapse to Axel and choose the best options so that they fuck before the trip. Ian doesn't suspect a thing.
No, just other players sharing about similar experiences they had with women in life like male characters in the game, omg.But you don't see any comments here saying "Alison handled that rejection really well, some women murder men after they get rejected like Jody Arias."
That remark was specifically referencing SOME men. It was not a sweeping generalization you've made it to be.you specifically reference men. Of course there are instances of a person (man or woman) responding badly.
It was perfectly normal remark in the given context. (of fictional character behaving rudely) In no way the reference you took offense at was not normal, not acceptable or "attacking men".But you don't see any comments here saying "Alison handled that rejection really well, some women murder men after they get rejected like Jody Arias." Just because you can create a reference doesn't mean it's in any way normal or accepted.
Eva is good at insults between women and bad at insults between men.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I dunno, "spaghetti face" is kinda perfect for Robert
Maybe in 2027 if eva doesn't finish burning all at once.Cat fight soon over Ian or axel please.
That's a bit lame, more original than the overused "fuck face" thoughI dunno, "spaghetti face" is kinda perfect for Robert![]()
mommysboiii leave this poor ed's mind and free him from your fantasies. In the name of the father, the son and the holy spirit I command you to leave his mind amen.Father forgive me for I am about to sin.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
you wrote "Jack's reaction is nothing as opposed to 'some dudes who can react far worse due to rejecting their advances.'" who are the 'some dudes' you are referencing? The royal nature of the comment does not look like you reference the game. But yeah 'in the game', some women are are WAY too emotional.That remark was specifically referencing SOME men. It was not a sweeping generalization you've made it to be.
It was perfectly normal remark in the given context. (of fictional character behaving rudely) In no way the reference you took offense at was not normal, not acceptable or "attacking men".
This whole exchange is almost like a parody in its stupidity.
"Some men are assholes. [worse than this fictional character]"
"Not ALL men!"
"Yes, that's what I said."
![]()
#1 it wasn't me who wrote it.you wrote "Jack's reaction is nothing as opposed to 'some dudes who can react far worse due to rejecting their advances.'" who are the 'some dudes' you are referencing? The royal nature of the comment does not look like you reference the game. But yeah 'in the game', some women are are WAY too emotional.
I don't know, none of them makes a scene about "attacking women" out of a simple remark.But yeah 'in the game', some women are are WAY too emotional.