I agree that the requisites for the holy trinity should be more stringent. To match the tone of the writing you would probably need the same requisites than the Ian and Lena pure path in addition to the lena_go_holly variable and a higher value for the ian_go_holly (I think 1 is currently enough).Hmm the comment in the code ("lena dating route") makes it seem like this is intentional, but at the same time i really feel like this is accident with variable mix-up, because not only the check gets passed without any actual Lena dating taking place, it makes absolutely no sense for Holly to come to Ian, hat in hand, about her Lena crush, when Lena and Ian are simply friends with benefits. It also doesn't make any real sense in this situation for Ian to have options to act as if either Holly or Lena was obliged to tell him about is as soon as it happened. It also makes little sense for the whole supposed "pure trinity" to just kind of form out of nowhere when two out of three people involved are fucking around with potentially all that moves and have very little to no romantic development between them.
PilotLara sorry to bother you, but could you maybe check with EK if it is intentional that it is possible for "holly trinity" to form when Ian isn't dating (as in, actually dating) neither Lena nor Holly? Because these bits in chapter_12b:
were perhaps supposed to be checkingPython:if lena_go_holly == 5 and ian_lena_dating:
ian_lena_couple
instead of the fuck buddies "dating" variable..? It's pretty easy to forget here that this "dating" isn't actually dating, especially in this context whenian_holly_dating
exists and is a flag for "real" relationship.
edit: looking further, this issue extends to chapter_12c where Ian and Lena can have a morning talk about Holly and the trinity (as the check only hinges onlena_go_holly == 5
), and the way the whole thing is written really makes no sense in scenario where Ian and Lena are just fuckbuddies -- the whole conversation completely ignores this possibility and is hard-coded to proceed as if Lena and Ian are in love with each other ("I'm afraid to hurt either of you. You've both become the most important people in my life, and I don't want to lose you..." etc) even though Lena and Ian at this point never "upgraded" their relationship from FWB status --that would normally occur later in this chapter but the trinity talk at the beach in the evening actually blocks that-- and there's possibility that they don't have any actual love flags set for each other. It similarly makes no sense for Ian in this context to have any say whether Lena and Holly are "allowed" to have a relationship or whether they should stop, or even act as if he's entitled to have any say regarding that, when Ian and Lena are simply hooking up and Ian is just one of potentially many Lena's sex outlets.
But I disagree with Holly going to talk to Ian about the kiss making no sense in the current circunstances. For someone like Holly (with little experience) maybe there is no much difference between the couple situation and the FWB. Also I would argue that kissing your friend's fuckbuddy is not cool, the very least you could do is tell him. At least that would be the case being a man, I assume is the same if your female friend kisses your gf (never been in the situation). In addition to that, there's the precedence of Lena "breaking up" with Ian over him kissing Holly and both Ian and Lena disliking the other having sex with other people (whether they are in their right to be or not).