- Jan 25, 2021
- 2,324
- 5,528
Hmm. With careful consideration in response to the many varied points in your essay:What I want is someone to explain the following:
Why is there such a huge desire for "cuck material", instead of simply KNOWING that you are in a basic "non-committed relationship", thereby damn well KNOW that there is another person involved?
I mean, WHY does it instantly have to be "cuck material", often shown through one male promoting or enjoying the 2nd male's participation. How about simply knowing you aren't the "only dick in mix" and NOT being "cuck" by it, but being encouraged to be the "bull", or POSSIBLY trying to arrange 3-somes?
WHY the apparent desire/need for "cuck content" only?
THAT is the part that makes zero sense to me. I mean, you are talking about a game that allows you to play BOTH the Male and Female side of the story. WHY would you want to play 1/2 the game as a 'cuck' when you can then turn right around and play the 2nd half basically doing everything possible to AVOID the 'cuck' situation entirely? If you are able to play both sides of the coin, you might as well just remove the option to play 1-side entirely OR simply do nothing but "linear storytelling" because reaching the 'cuck content' would require BOTH parties to agree to it all along.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I for one do NOT want to spend 1/2 my game trying to 'reach cuck content' only to turn right around and play the 2nd 1/2 of basically playing the SAME CONTENT over, just to reach the SAME RESULT! It would require the Ian side to go along with it, and then the Lena side to go along with it, only to have the same conclusion at the end of it all that MIGHT not even be worth the wasted time and effort to reach if I could simply play my Lena side as someone who is 'getting some on the side' because Ian isn't 'committed' all along. Especially knowing full well that playing a "non-comitted Ian" allows me to play THAT side of the story as 'getting some on the side' as well.
It just doesn't make sense to me that "cuck content" would be so important to some people knowing full well that it would be either:
1) Entirely avoidable
2) Require rewriting entire sections from M/F view points to reach it.
3) Can be seen as "pointless" if NOT in a committed relationship with each other.
And 4) Would INSTANTLY remove large sections of possible content and confrontations with other characters by removing options.
Sorry, but the way I see it. Our Red String is NOT the proper game format (By playing both sides of the story) where "Cuck content" would make even the SLIGHTEST bit of sense UNTIL you have a "fully committed relationship" with each other at some point. Even then, "Cuck content" would ONLY work by going into the game with the mindset of "I am purposefully going to ignore a lot of content/options JUST to reach this one result"... And THEN what? You've cut out so much content with OTHER characters involved that you end up with one, maybe TWO scenes, before you are limited completely to the same "Cuck content" being the same people over and over and over and over because you haven't built a relationship of any type with the REMAINING characters?
Sorry gang, but I see a much easier and enjoyable game where I can play Lena, messing around with Robert and Mike on the side, and end up with various 3-somes in different locations at different times because NEITHER Robert or Mike seem to be "couple material" to begin with. Nor do they seem "Cuck content" type characters either. If anything, I would see Mike being the "bull" in a Robert-relationship, but even THEN, Robert isn't someone who I would want to spend a large amount of time with. So would I really be playing Lena in a "cuck relationship" or simply playing Lena in a "non-serious relationship with Robert" while enjoying a bit of "fun on the side with Mike" and possibly even Alex/Jeremy or Ian 3-somes with Mike all along?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.