Is it possible that the whole Holly & Mark on Holly love path is deliberately made a bug by the author to mess and confuse players, which will be 'fixed' in the next update?
- Thread starter Eva Kiss
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg anal sex bdsm big ass big tits cheating corruption creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination female protagonist group sex handjob harem interracial lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game multiple protagonist netorare oral sex point & click romance sex toys stripping swinging teasing titfuck turn based combat vaginal sex
- Jun 2, 2022
- 1,858
- 4,260
That's what it feels like. But then you have the implausible situation where 20-somethings running in the same circles for at least half their lives in a town of several hundred inhabitants haven't already met each other up till now.
I used to joke "oh, hey. Do you know Greg?" when meeting some random stranger from a state I used to live in. In Ian-ville though, it seems like a natural question.
Last edited:
- May 6, 2023
- 2,451
- 5,133
Agree, I'm hoping Gillian's boyfriend will be a new charismatic character. Perhaps even strongly appeal to Lena and create a challenge to the whole dynamic between Lena/Ian/Gillian.
I've got it! Ian is all pumped up, ready to fight. That mixed martial arts training finally about to pay off! And then you hear a "vvvvrrrrrr" and Gillian's boyfriend rolls jaggedly around the corner in an electric wheelchair, speaking through a motorized straw set-up like Steven Hawking.... (Tho depending on your Ian, you can still kick his ass).
The real twist is he's got a dick bigger than Jeremy's (and it works).
The real twist is he's got a dick bigger than Jeremy's (and it works).
- Oct 29, 2017
- 3,393
- 15,344
How much blow did you take when constructing this theory?
Don't turn this into GOT S8 where it's all about "subverting expectations". Mike fits Gillian's boyfriend so well from all the details in the game. It also make sense from a narrative point of view and is more interesting this way given the possible decisions we can do in the game. Changing this because "audience already knows the twist" just screams that the author just wants to feel smart by proving people wrong and inadvertently ruining the established hints and narrative potential for a cheap "plot twist".
- Nov 25, 2017
- 292
- 1,000
College Craze is a good option, similar to Our Red String in the tons of paths you can take, has pretty good writing, and multi-stat gamification like ORS. It's a fem protag game set in college.
Our Red String has cleaner art, is a little more straightforward in the paths you can follow, and has a more mature post-college age cohort that's still slice of life in its storyline, so it's pretty unique. It's also hard to find any games (or stories in general) with dual protagonists like ORS, for better or worse.
Yeah. But that's like Eva's been making us all a shit sandwich all this time. We see her getting a few loaves together. Downing some Exlax. Cutting the bread subway style. Pulling her pants down. Then in the last second ruffling through her pockets for her cell-phone and ordering us up a fillet mignon via door dash. You can stay in line for the shit sandwich. I'll take the steak.
(Basically, Mike/Gillian was a bad set-up to begin with).
Also, off topic, but Game of Thrones ending wasn't bad BECAUSE of the twist in Season 8. It was bad because it didn't earn it. GRR meant for that ending to happen. The show-runners had just been screwing the pooch since veering off the books in Seasons 5-6 and didn't set it up properly. Quality drop and crowd-pleasing bullshit starting in Season 5, with occassional moments of good until the downhill tumble of Season 7.
Last edited:
GRRM never said he planned for Arya to kill the Night King. It was done by D&D to "subvert expectations" when people were expecting it to either be Dany or Jon in one way or another. When asked if the ending of ASOIAF would be the same, GRRM responded with 'yes and no and yes and no' and fans have speculated that Bran becoming king would still be an ending. Still, the whole "subverting expectations" that D&D pulled is still nonsense because of the story THEY made, not GRRM. People expected Dany or Jon to be king, based on the story that the showrunners created but instead, Bran was made king to "subvert expectations" even when it made no sense to the story.Yeah. But that's like Eva's been making us all a shit sandwich all this time. We see her getting a few loaves together. Downing some Exlax. Cutting the bread subway style. Pulling her pants down. Then in the last second ruffling through her pockets for her cell-phone and ordering us up a fillet mignon via door dash. You can stay in line for the shit sandwich. I'll take the steak.
(Basically, Mike/Gillian was a bad set-up to begin with).
Also, off topic, but Game of Thrones ending wasn't bad BECAUSE of the twist in Season 8. It was bad because it didn't earn it. GRR meant for that ending to happen. The show-runners had just been screwing the pooch since veering off the books in Seasons 5-6 and didn't set it up properly. Quality drop and crowd-pleasing bullshit starting in Season 5, with occassional moments of good until the downhill tumble of Season 7.
Not sure what you're trying to say with your 'analogy' but Mike being Gillian's boyfriend is not a "shit sandwich". As I said before, it makes a lot sense both from a logical point of view based on the information in the game and the narrative point of view where his being the boyfriend adds more to the drama and the intricacies of the relationship that Ian, Lena, Mike, Gillian, and even Jeremy will have to weave through in future updates. If you consider what the author is doing is shit then I'd be curious why you're still sticking here, enjoying their story and game. I'm also not sure what your "FILET mignon" could be for Gillian's boyfriend. All other options would just suck and odd or out of place from the story so far. Billy? Spike? Are those supposed to be the steak?
Last edited:
The Arya part was pure shit, yeah. Crowd-pleasing yass-queen nonsense that pleased no-one at all and made little sense. Painfully contrived crap. You hadn't stated that specifically so I thought you meant the Dany flip-out at the end with the burning and the killing and the rest.
On the other point: You're putting words in my mouth. "If you consider what the author is doing is shit." Nope. Just certain far-too-coincidental-to-be-plausible plot-turns like this one, which I and others have already stated in previous posts. Judging on the basis of porn-game writers, Eva's actually one of the best. I keep playing/following because the game is still good and she's a good dev.
The "Steak" would be to avoid yet another implausibly coincidental connection of a character we already know and just have a well-crafted new character applied in an interesting way. Spike would be more eye-rolling than Mike. Billy nearly as much.
Last edited:
Wish there was more games like this. Although I don't care much for the multiple protagonists, I'd much rather play one character with more content driven towards that one, rather than swapping between the two. Still very good game and I hope we see more games from Eva Kiss. Been fun playing them and making my own choices, I like to play as the pure innocent type, but most games don't know how to flavor that up a bit. A lot of games are corrupt person, then have gangbangs lol. Like a bit extreme for a saint to go from angel to little devil in a week or two. Be cool if Eva could make more of an open world with dialogue choices based on discovery of the options and also a plot, for our inevitable climax.
- Jun 2, 2022
- 1,858
- 4,260
I think Lena is looking like in phase of the sixth pic from left
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I don't think having Mike as the boyfriend is that implausible. It was stated early on in the game that he's recent to the city and Lena meeting Mike isn't far fetched either. His work as a DJ is pretty "public" where he can meet and be acquainted with a lot of people so meeting Lena is a possibility especially if you consider that Ivy also works there. There are a lot more bizzare events that happened to real people in their everyday lives. This also ties to the title and theme of the game where it talks about the red threads of fate where these 'coincidences' may not be so, especially if you consider the Seymour-Lena theory. I'm also playing and reading a story crafted by an author, and if I just want a mundane and not out-of-the-ordinary story then I'd just live my life. If Mike isn't going to be the boyfriend, then the author would miss out on a lot of good drama and more gripping story. It would be a shame if the "hints" are all just a red herring and they amount to nothing in the end.
That's not quite accurate: Lena can refuse, but only if she has a will point to spare. Otherwise i agree, you could say Iva has corrupting influence on Lena (and potentially Holly) but then again, that's simply what she herself lives like. She enjoys it and thinks it's a lifestyle her friends would have fun with, too.
- Dec 15, 2020
- 2,397
- 5,493
Regardless of how tolerable he is on his route, the second he brought up Lena's job and how he could "help" I refuse to engage any further with him.
I assume you have to engage with him on some level to get that, Ivy didn't bring him up with me, no reason to I suppose since he's a non-factor for me.In ch11 I was totally surprised to see Ivy suggest Robert as a casual sex object for Holly, and Lena can choose to set that up or not. Not so much that Ivy would suggest it, that makes sense, just that I'd never have put Robert and Holly together in the first place. In terms of personality I can't see it going very well, but of course that doesn't necessarily have to be a factor
I don't think it's fair to defend her entirely either. Eva is a big girl and she chose to do the double protagonist thing herself. It's not that difficult to write non-toxic characters.
For some reason though, all of Lena's options apart from Ian and Holly have major negative details to them that absolutely ruin any non-sexual interest you'd have in them, if you don't play Lena like either a wanton slut or a complete hypocrite. This isn't exclusive to the males either, Louise and Ivy both have components that makes them undesirable for anything other than the sex itself.
Also the drugs.
Rather than Ivy corrupting Lena, because Lena can be played to be somewhat open to her suggestions to begin with, I see Ivy as the harbiinger for potential things to come. Besides the drugs and the things you mentioned Ivy is also the standard-bearer for pole-dancing, tattoos, piercings etc. If Ivy is introducing some element to the story you can be fairly sure Lena will either have the option to do that thing right away or some time in the near future.
It's a pity though because there is really no reason for Robert to be so shafted (teehee) in regards to his presentation and narrative role. Ian is an MC, any doubts about his intentions can be expelled by the players themselves, this is part of the reason why Ian/Lena doesn't interest me personally, because any dramatic potential in their relationship has to be manufactured by the player, which I think undermines any dynamism completely.
Robert could just have been a normal dude instead of a creep and a joke and I am fairly sure he wouldn't have been undermining Ian at all to begin with.
Bran becoming king could work I guess. As long as it isn't this whole "Bran the Broken" shit Tyrion conjures up randomly, trying to make something ridiculous sound inspirational. The old guys laughed at Sam's democracy suggestion but not at the idea of making a crippled teenager into their ruler?
Yeah, I theorize that this is the plan of the "old gods" or the neural network of Weirwoods where they can have someone have a more direct and overt impact on the history of Westeros and not the more hidden or scheming way that Bloodraven has been with influencing people and events.