Hungover00
Engaged Member
- Apr 29, 2023
- 2,586
- 3,150
Book 4 of Ian's screening pile was both good and marketable. Book 2 was shit but marketable, while book 1 was just shit and had no audience, and book 3 was quality but would have a hard time finding an audience. I still think the game is kind of wrong for not giving book 3 a positive point. It just needs to be marketed differently, part of their prestige line, and put it up for a bunch of awards. Book 2 doesn't need awards, it has an audience of readers that (occasionally?) enjoy a popcorn book. That's fine.Sure, Seymour has influence, but so does Minerva, the judges and of course quality of the book as well, else the entire mini-game would've been a waste.
I wonder if Seymour can guarantee to puplish the book even if its dogshit. Then again, I always wondered if a high book score may not indicate for the book to be published; perhaps a badly written trashy generic book is in favor of better written quality books?
Specialising is fine, but diversifying is good too. And it seems like that publisher has the freedom to take a few hits on a prestige novel. What's the term, 'loss-leader?'