- Jul 4, 2018
- 878
- 1,071
Is this Evakiss alt account or something?He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.
He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer. If they have no connection, why would he do that?
No, what happens to make me believe it is the fact if Lena rejects his advances which he initiates afterwards he doesn't put the word in for her like he said he would. His demand is carried through his actions and the consequences, not his words.He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened.
How else was he supposed to ask her out? Maybe without making it a condition to tell her what he claimed was important information regarding her work? I'm acting like it was a sleazy piece of blackmail, because it was.He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You are now inventing something that's not there (or reverting the timeline) It's not a matter of choosing between Lena and another woman when Lena and Robert spoke. Lena's contract was supposed to be reduced/cut due to the mess caused by Axel:You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer.
r "It seems Samantha overheard the chef and the staff chief talking the other day."
l "About what?"
r "About you."
l "About me? Why?"
r "Well, Friday's incident made quite a ruckus. People are talking about it..."
l "Oh, God..."
r "And the chief wasn't too thrilled about what happened on Thursday's service when they had to send you home early."
l "But that wasn't my fault! None of it was..."
r "Of course not, but I guess they're not too pleased with your personal life interfering with work..."
Whether you intentionally tried or not, your posts clearly imply that to which I replied with facts. I never mentioned even a SINGLE time that Ian is less evil than Jeremy or vice versa. Only thing on which IMO they differ is the extent of damage done to relationship.I can assure you, I'm not generally trying to portray Ian as evil. I love Ian as a character, as much as I love Lena, Cindy, Emma, Alison, Ivy, Holly and Jessica. But Cindy is his dark side moment, just as it's possibly his most passionate moment in the whole game. In that moment, he becomes everything that he despises, to pursue Cindy. He's doing exactly the same thing, that his previous girlfriend did to him. That's portrayed by everybody who knows Ian, as an evil act. So is Ian being any less evil himself?...
If Lena doesn't have sex with Jeremy she can get in relationship with Ian so how can you say that Jeremy is NOT the reason of Lena not going for relationship with Ian...But you're wrong about Jeremy. By having sex with Lena, he ultimately doesn't cause any damage at all. Because that's the moment, that Lena decides her and Ian have no future. When they have the talk, Lena says she doesn't want to be his girlfriend. So I'm not sure why you're suggesting they're in a relationship? As soon as Lena decides to have sex with Jeremy, she knows she can't have a relationship with Ian.
They only have a future, if Lena and Jeremy don't have sex. By the time it happens, it's already gone.
You are saying it like it's a bad thing.The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character,
I've never liked Robert since I've been playing this game. I never could articulate why. At first I thought it was because he was the first romantic rival we were introduced to. But I don't have the same issue with the other male characters. As insufferable Axel is, I don't dislike him. Mike is a cheating bastard yet I don't dislike him. Jeremy despite his playboy persona I can tolerate and he even has some redeeming qualities.He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.
He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer. If they have no connection, why would he do that?
Her contract doesn't get renewed if she refuses to fuck him, even if she lets him down gently. Robert is an entitled douche who thinks the girl he likes owes him sex just cause he's "nice to her". These sort of men are a dime a dozen.He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.
He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer. If they have no connection, why would he do that?
It's called coercion.Sure he didn't blackmail Lena but he is using his position of authority to lure Lena into sleeping with him.
The twist: it's EK's self-depreciating self-insert.Dunno, maybe Eva met someone like him and puts of all of her aggressions by constantly mocking him? He is pretty much the exact opposite of that perfect dream boyfriend, the perfect cringy sulky date.
I don't really care about how Robert relates to Perry or Ian, I don't play Lena as having an interest in either of them either, but when you don't play to Robert's tune 100% the dude threatens Lena's job. That is not just creepy, corrupt and pathetic, it's simply just a turn off when you aren't that into non or dub-con.I think the most hard done to person in this game is Robert. He's nowhere near as bad, as a lot of people make him out to be. He genuinely wants to be Lena's boyfriend, and he pretty much worships the ground she walks on. He just has this one issue with Perry early on, which Ian takes exception to. But to be fair, Perry often does some pretty daft stuff, and was just as drunk as Robert was at the time, and equally at fault. People who are drunk often do daft things, but it doesn't make them into bad people. Plus that was a pretty bad evening for Robert, having just been beaten up by Axel, after he defended Lena.
Ian totally overreacts and literally labels Robert as scum, on the basis of one poor drunken decision.
Being drunk doesn't make you daft, just shines light on your inner you.I think the most hard done to person in this game is Robert. He's nowhere near as bad, as a lot of people make him out to be. He genuinely wants to be Lena's boyfriend, and he pretty much worships the ground she walks on. He just has this one issue with Perry early on, which Ian takes exception to. But to be fair, Perry often does some pretty daft stuff, and was just as drunk as Robert was at the time, and equally at fault. People who are drunk often do daft things, but it doesn't make them into bad people. Plus that was a pretty bad evening for Robert, having just been beaten up by Axel, after he defended Lena.
Ian totally overreacts and literally labels Robert as scum, on the basis of one poor drunken decision.
While the second half of your statement is going to be 110% true, and we'll all continue to joke about how much of a loser Robert is.why is given the chance to get Holly? Probably we get an extremely awkward date and we can laugh about how much Robert failed.
They don't actually have to fail. That only happens if you let them.
Your expresion while typing thisWith Robert it was plainly stated that Eva makes him as bad and pathetic as possible. He is always put in a bad light and has the worst luck. I find it overbearing how much of a joke he is. He gets all possible negative traits of a pathetic partner because its soo funny every time Lena disses him. Could've been way subtler.
I like the angle of a relatively decent guy Lena can casualy date. He is well dressed, has a stable job (compare that with all the other losers in this game) and a active social live without much drama. Ultimately, Eva went for the Doug approach and made him and Lena incompatible, they don't have much to say to each other.
Another issue is the amount of quantive content he is given for someone designed to be a joke. If he is that much of a nothing character without potential, why is given the chance to get Holly? Probably we get an extremely awkward date and we can laugh about how much Robert failed.
Dunno, maybe Eva met someone like him and puts of all of her aggressions by constantly mocking him? He is pretty much the exact opposite of that perfect dream boyfriend, the perfect cringy sulky date.
The game doesn't demand anything. EK goes out of the way to add decent loving routes as well as darker sluttier routes to ORS and GGGB. Personally, my favorite endings in GGGB are almost all the "good" endings, with Ash / Eva / Jess / Jack / Iris all being better off from where they started.the game demands it if you want to have a wide choice of options, or you find yourself with a neutered game, so it's wider if the couple doesn't exist or if they conflict, I noticed that a world of scenes open up, if the dev had it wanted to focus on them as a path, he wouldn't have left much margin for error, a simple mistake is enough for Lena to become a slut.