Yeah, I imagine they would.
Eva has a weird idea that being Bi and sleeping with the same sex (for women) does not equal cheating.
John being there made me laugh,bro appeared out of nowhere and hes going to have threesomes tooBoom! collection complete
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Eva has some... interesting views. I've still entirely forgiven them for having Jasmine from GGGB be a weird amalgamation of TERF tropes: Transwomen as looming muscular criminals who spend their time molesting cis women in changing rooms.
A) We knew that Mark has had threesomes with two women, or MMF, from GGGB. Ash and Eva can join him and Jacob, or him and Jacob can fuck Eva together if Ash refuses. So his response isn't too surprising.Mark's response to "Are you sure you can handle us" is way better than Robert's
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
In her defense. EK never really wanted to touch Jasmine as they weren't comfortable doing a trans character in the first place. It was a capitulation to their patrons, and I would have to imagine that most of those TERF tropes came from them and not necessarily EK. EK has said they won't be doing trans characters again.
True in that sense. It´s a good example that Eva Kiss, while overall a top notch writer -compared to their peers- is completely clueless (or naive / oblivious) in certain aspects; scenarios; type of characters. It shows, drastically at times, though more so in GGGB than ORS tbf. That whole drug dealing mamacita route was cringe as fuck, too imo. I don´t remember the details, only played GGGB well after it was completed but there was talk, this Jasmine character got added in late. A high tier patron basically throwing money at Eva to do it? If true it might explain that one, to a degree at least.
Probably, but it's subjective. In my opinion, the ideal thing is for Ian (if you're into Holly Trinity) to help Wade not give up on Cindy, and for that to influence their relationship in future episodes.
The sad part is that by slightly modifying her introduction Eva had a real winner with Jasmine.
Since getting with Cindy blocks Alison's love route my "canon" save is Ian trying to help Wade with the relationship while supporting Cindy. Gotta keep her away from that pos Axel.
I'll put it on the listPilotLara At the moment there is still no opportunity for cuck Ian to give the necklace he bought to Lena. Do you know if this is intended? Or if he will give it to her at a later date. It's kinda a missed opportunity Lena can't fuck other men while wearing Ian's necklace!
Re-checking the script, i think it may actually be possible to still follow the initial outline, just with some small tweak: instead of interrupting Holly and Mark when they talk, pick
"Leave them to it". This will advance holly_change by 1, but leave holly_guy at 1. If the resulting change is less than 5, you can still "Let Holly decide" in the follow-up discussion and she won't yet feel ready to hook up with Mark. You can then proceed with the blowjob etc as normal.I think the good path is getting Wade to accept the relationship is over and break up with Cindy. Maybe that could end with a reconciliation in late game after Cindy gets her modeling career fucked over. Or Wade will end up as a pro player with some egirl.
Further testing this, I think there's another issue with that check. If Ian and Lena are in the pure path and have had the threesome with Louise, the (ian_lena_pure and ian_lena_3some == False) condition for not having sex with Emma is false but as the check is an OR, you don't get sex with Emma because the last condition would be true as ian_lena_couple is true and they are not in an open relationship.
if holly_trinity == 2 or lena_holly_dating or (ian_lena_pure and ian_lena_3some == False) or ( ian_lena_open and ian_lena_open != "lena" and ian_lena_open != "ian"):
jump v13emmadateendif holly_trinity == 2
jump v13emmadateend
elif lena_holly_dating
jump v13emmadataend
elif ian_lena_pure and ian_lena_3some == False
jump v13emmadataend
elif ian_lena_open and ian_lena_open != "lena" and ian_lena_open != "ian"
jump v13emmadataend
else
go to sex with EmmaIIRC this was reported earlier, since i pretty much ran into that bug face-first. So, there's some chance this was fixed in more recent builds EK is now working on.
Cool, it's a difficult if to write mixing conditions from completely different paths and checking for the negative result instead of the positive. Every dev has their quirks with these things but I think losing a bit of elegance with some extra lines instead of a single one it's worthy for the improvement on cleanliness and readibility. Specially when you have to go back to the code months after writing it for some maintenance or refactoring, I have cursed myself (and others) several times when I found myself in that situation
.
i have to be honest jasmine was good
i liked her and twitter/reddit (communist) that think (toxic sterotyps) in her community