aris666
Member
- Jan 6, 2020
- 327
- 494
To be fair it would be fun - Ian x Lena x Cherry
Sort of restoration of girls friendship
Sort of restoration of girls friendship
I mean, she is constantly pushing them together. The whole story of how they meet, how they speak to each other, it's pretty clear that their relationship is the fulcrum of the story. The pillar.It's from her patreon
What is Our Red String?
Our Red String is my attempt to take what I learned from Good Girl Gone Bad and, hopefully, create an even better narrative experience. This time around you play as two characters, Lena and Ian as they attempt to find themselves, chase their dreams and seek love or lust in accordance with your guiding hand.
Wherever did you get idea from? This game was never about wholesome romance, it's part of it? Yes but that's it.
Since we can be in Lena and Cherry paths at the same time, i won't be surprised if this happen in right way now. And if this piss off Axel even more, even betterTo be fair it would be fun - Ian x Lena x Cherry
Sort of restoration of girls friendship![]()
Id rather have a shoot out between lena and cherry than that lmaoSince we can be in Lena and Cherry paths at the same time, i won't be surprised if this happen in right way now. And if this piss off Axel even more, even better
Well, we still don’t have the full picture of the Lena/Cherry/Axel story. We got a bit of Lena and Cherry’s personal view.Id rather have a shoot out between lena and cherry than that lmao
Don't underestimate Holly's desire to be the perfect girlfriend for Ian and gain sexual confidence (even without Ivy's "help"). She's not the possessive type, would probably be even okay with a casual relationship if both Ian and Lena would give her this chance instead of making the choice for her. Holly is bisexual, so if she meets a girl she likes, and who wouldn't treat her badly and betray her (like her former friend did), there's nothing stopping her from trying except for her shyness and lack of experience. Emma or Cherry would be best girls for Holly to have a threesome with because they'd treat her with respect and wouldn't tease her after that, and Ian would be careful and make sure that she's 100% on board before setting something up.If I'm not wrong Holly isn't opposed to threesome only when she's on what should I say corruption route, which basically stops once she enters in relationship with Ian or Lena goes after her, and I doubt someone shy and bit insecure girl like current Holly would agree for something like threesome it would too out of character for her.
Just wanted to note - that you are completely right. She was not ok with the fact, that Axel was already cheating with Cherry before they had sex all three together. So there shouldn't be anything in the way of such developments with Lena. And not necessary - just with Holly.I don't think threesome was ever a problem for Lena (atleast I don't remember it being) cheating was. Axel cheated on her with Cherry thn had audacity to propose threesome with same girl he cheated with.
Love and lust never do make sense or need to. They just happen to you and you can't help but experience them. When Axel kisses her and reignites all of the familiar passions while subduing her jealous hurt (especially if they had the talk before and she stopped hating him), her hormones just tell her to fuck him and it's very hard for someone who's been in that relationship for so long to resist falling back into that lust just to once again feel safe and carefree at the same time. Logic or thoughts about other people can fly out the window. Lots of female cheating happens this way. They don't pre-plan it, but they feel so good in the moment they can't find strength to resist. Which is why if Lena lets it happen, all of her remaining Willpower just disappears. Just like that of a recovering alcoholic who once again finds themselves alone with a bottle and only a tiny sane part of their brain telling them to resist but their entire body begs them just to have one last sip.It doesnt really make sense for her to then go fuck Axel or Jeremy again, who she despises due to their infidelity.
All good and all that- but I think its dumb that getting the Axel kiss sets Lena's willpower to 0.Love and lust never do make sense or need to. They just happen to you and you can't help but experience them. When Axel kisses her and reignites all of the familiar passions while subduing her jealous hurt (especially if they had the talk before and she stopped hating him), her hormones just tell her to fuck him and it's very hard for someone who's been in that relationship for so long to resist falling back into that lust just to once again feel safe and carefree at the same time. Logic or thoughts about other people can fly out the window. Lots of female cheating happens this way. They don't pre-plan it, but they feel so good in the moment they can't find strength to resist. Which is why if Lena lets it happen, all of her remaining Willpower just disappears. Just like that of a recovering alcoholic who once again finds themselves alone with a bottle and only a tiny sane part of their brain telling them to resist but their entire body begs them just to have one last sip.
You can. Lena only loses all of her Will points if you don't and just let it happen.Like- let the player use a will-point to extract themselves or something. Is Lena seriously this spineless?
You can't earn more than 2 Will points at the same time. It's the limit that you have to get around by and it motivates you to spend it occasionally so you could refill it by doing certain things.While we are on the subject of Will points- it would be nice if there were some non-sexual things Lena could spend them on; because I think I would have earned like 5 on my play-through and I spent 0.
edit: by the way, it's funny that Lena is against threesome due to her past with Axel and Cherry, but she is ok to suck dick of her friend's boyfriend (with said friend in the same room + another friend)
I really don’t get this apparent expectation that the characters need to act rational or in accordance with their own principles in every situation. Yes, a fictional character’s actions obviously shouldn’t feel random or completely out of the blue, as that’s just poor writing. But it’s also bad writing if the characters don’t have any flaws or never make the "wrong" choices when they’re given immoral alternatives. A character who helps an old lady across the road every single day: boring. A character who does it for a while but then one day suddenly decides to not help: interesting.And to fuck her cheating Ex while she has a boyfriend, and to fuck someone else's DJ boyfriend, and to fuck her friend's boyfriend in her own room while she has the lena_loves_ian tag in her friends own room on her friend's bed.....
That's biological determinism and it has little to no basis in real life, and even trying to think of it as real is pretty dangerous reasoning.Love and lust never do make sense or need to. They just happen to you and you can't help but experience them. When Axel kisses her and reignites all of the familiar passions while subduing her jealous hurt (especially if they had the talk before and she stopped hating him), her hormones just tell her to fuck him and it's very hard for someone who's been in that relationship for so long to resist falling back into that lust just to once again feel safe and carefree at the same time. Logic or thoughts about other people can fly out the window. Lots of female cheating happens this way. They don't pre-plan it, but they feel so good in the moment they can't find strength to resist. Which is why if Lena lets it happen, all of her remaining Willpower just disappears. Just like that of a recovering alcoholic who once again finds themselves alone with a bottle and only a tiny sane part of their brain telling them to resist but their entire body begs them just to have one last sip.
The fun part is subjective. For you- it sounds like it would be less fun. For me- it would be equally fun; I derive negative enjoyment from those sorts of routes. In fact, I'd enjoy the game more if Jeremy / Mike weren't in the game at all- they just annoy me.And how much fun would it be if the Ian and Lena romance by default locked out all those other options? I also have an exclusive Ian and Lena playthrough among my saves, but that would have been a lot more boring if it didn’t include actively deciding not to do anything when the other options arise.
Axel Kiss) What I mean is that you should be able to extract yourself after the kiss. Pedantic I suppose- but still another exit point would make more sense than will=0 and auto sex on a kiss- assuming you have a spine.You can. Lena only loses all of her Will points if you don't and just let it happen.
You can't earn more than 2 Will points at the same time. It's the limit that you have to get around by and it motivates you to spend it occasionally so you could refill it by doing certain things.
No better time to pull it, to be honest. Not to make this bigger than it is, but reasoning like that tends to encourage a kind of dissociation and removal of agency from oneself and one's actions that really serves no one.That's biological determinism and it has little to no basis in real life, and even trying to think of it as real is pretty dangerous reasoning.
People aren't slaves to their "hormones", at all. They can be a slave to their desires, which is 1000% different from what you said. You can't just mess with a girl and "her hormones tell her to fuck you", that's simply not real.
You can say things like: "her mindstate is pretty confused right now, seeing Axel reignited some pent-up desires and since she has low willpower and self-esteem, she went with it". Saying "her hormones made her do it" is just plain ignorant.
I hate pulling this card on the internet, becauce people never believe it at face value, but I'm a practicing physician (Internal Medicine), and there is no such thing as mind-control hormones...
I think most players agree that Robert’s had more scenes than necessary. But I also think they add something to Lena’s character development: At the beginning Robert’s the one trying to take advantage of Lena. But gradually their relationship changes, and by chapter 9 it’s rather Lena who’s using him, while Robert’s obviously got feelings for her.Robert having more scenes then anyone else when he's just a drop-in character to make Ian look better is weird and dumb.
Sure, it’s subjective, but if the simple existence of the paths you don’t like affects the overall experience so negatively, it sounds like you’re bound to be disappointed? Like all similar games it’s got a wide range of routes to cover many different kinks — and to make sure it actually feels like we’re deciding the paths of the characters — and without that it would barely be considered a game. If you dislike one or several characters it obviously affects the replayability, but apart from that I don’t understand why anyone would feel so strong about the routes that are hidden behind alternatives they either way aren’t interested in choosing.The fun part is subjective. For you- it sounds like it would be less fun. For me- it would be equally fun; I derive negative enjoyment from those sorts of routes. In fact, I'd enjoy the game more if Jeremy / Mike weren't in the game at all- they just annoy me.
It cannot be denied that genetic determinism plays a significant role. Not in decision making, but in predispositions and the ceiling of the development of possibilities. "A man can do anything" is nothing more than a pleasant phrase from entertainers.That's biological determinism and it has little to no basis in real life, and even trying to think of it as real is pretty dangerous reasoning.