To be fair, this builds up a little longer than you make it, in the sense it begins with Ian expressing insecurity over Lena showing herself off on her Stalkerfap. And then you have Ian show his insecurity further starting to ask about other guys' cocks.
If the player makes three consecutive choices that tell the game "yes i want to be put on cuck path" then it's a bit unrealistic to want it somehow infer from this "i don't actually want a cuck path, i just want to occasionally pretend this". I don't know of any porn game which actually allow for such flip-flopping kind of approach, it feels like expecting a little too much.
Also, am not sure what you're talking about re: shower. Lena offers Ian shower regardless of path. Afterwards she offers him breakfast, also no matter the path. It's cuck Ian who chooses to leave early. The comment about showering together, it also comes from Ian and, curiously enough, it depends on whether Ian has deleted Gillian's pictures. (and Lena asks for "five more minutes" also no matter what path Ian is on, it's not because she suddenly thinks less of cuck Ian)
You're exactly who I didn't want to back-and-forth with.
1. In my playthrough, it was only
two required choices that would validly signal the user towards to that path,
both in chapter 10.
Ch 10 I/L sex scene 1: "One of"?
I/L final stalkerfap shoot: Deny.
Lena being on Stalkerfap merely allows for a scene where one of those two selections is made, but is used in plenty of other paths. Moot point regardless though, since I still wanted the path. Was just hoping for it to play out differently. Still, the way it plays out is a pretty extreme jump based on how the rest of the playthrough was played.
2. What I was hoping for was a more realistic/plausible cuck or hotwife path option in general with some teasing, where they still have regular, healthy sex too, as well as a good relationship. A cuck/hotwife/teasting route doesn't have to be all extreme paypig (GGGB) or pure femdom/denial (as this is turning into) in the bedroom 100% of the time. And like with Eric in GGGB, I don't see it being a plausible long-term relationship that way. My suggestion to add the choice based on current assets from other routes was
merely suggesting a way an alternate healthier relationship path could be provided with minimal effort that wouldn't feel so extreme/femdom. (Thought I explained that well enough in the previous post, too).
3.
Most important: All I'm saying is I'm disappointed by the path. I have no idea why you feel the need to contradict that. Am I allowed to be disappointed? You don't care about the path so my disappointment in it shouldn't really concern you either. "Your disappointment is invalid" is kind of bullshit. Can someone dare not like the way a development turned out? Not everyone's going to get the routes they were looking for, which is fine. But I should be able to express disappointment for it. It's not like I'm demanding "
Eva must change this now!!!".
Basically: Stop minimizing other people's concerns.
Shower section: Fair enough.
