| Vee |
Well-Known Member
- Jun 2, 2022
- 1,874
- 4,340
- 383
The scene is intentional that Lena can only get this scenario if she is cheating.Peeking in the game script, there's actually leftover from faithful Lena giving in. It has a higher lust requirement, 8+
So, this is right now inaccessible because you can't getPython:if lena_jack == 2 and v9_axel_sex == False: // ... jk "Hey, babe... I was hoping you'd join me for that glass of champagne after all." menu: "{image=icon_sad.webp}I have a boyfriend..." if ian_lena_couple: // ... l "Yeah, about that... I have a boyfriend, you see..." jk "And I should be concerned about that because...?" if lena_cheating: l "Because I shouldn't cheat on him..." jk "Come on, you and I both know that's not something you're really worried about. I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time." l "And what makes you think that?" jk "Let's just say I have a sixth sense for that kind of thing. I recognize an adventurous girl when I see one." else: l "Because I'm not about to cheat on him with a guy who I just met." jk "Is that your way of asking me to convince you?" jk "I can play that game, but we both know you're up for a little adventure. Something you can't get from your boyfriend..." jk "So, are you brave enough to go for what you want?" menu: "{image=icon_lust.webp}Cheat on Ian" if lena_cheating or lena_lust > 7: // ...lena_jackto 2 in the initial conversation with faithful Lena. So, yeah, we're back to question if it's a bug or something intentional. Maybe PilotLara knows!
If couple but not cheating than blocked:
But there is this check blocked if not couple and the code you shared is from this check (I have a boyfriend choice which is dependent on if Lena is couple or not) and in this code block cheating check is also used:
So The problem is this check if that path is not left intentional:
Last edited: