SearingFive
Well-Known Member
- Mar 26, 2020
- 1,766
- 7,278
- 676
They don't actually have to fail. That only happens if you let them.Luckily for me I chose never to pair Ian-Lena together, a relationship that had already failed from the start was foreseeable, other paths would be better.
Robert tried to blackmail Lena though: date me and I'll speak good words to keep your job. He's not bad but not good eitherI think the most hard done to person in this game is Robert. He's nowhere near as bad, as a lot of people make him out to be. He genuinely wants to be Lena's boyfriend, and he pretty much worships the ground she walks on. He just has this one issue with Perry early on, which Ian takes exception to. But to be fair, Perry often does some pretty daft stuff, and was just as drunk as Robert was at the time, and equally at fault. People who are drunk often do daft things, but it doesn't make them into bad people. Plus that was a pretty bad evening for Robert, having just been beaten up by Axel, after he defended Lena.
Ian totally overreacts and literally labels Robert as scum, on the basis of one poor drunken decision.
He doesn't blackmail her. If she doesn't go out for a drink with him, he doesn't speak up for her. I mean why would he? You do stuff like that for people you're friendly with, not for people that you're not.Robert tried to blackmail Lena though: date me and I'll speak good words to keep your job. He's not bad but not good either
Plus, he has a bland personality, he's not interesting at all, even more in a porn game.
When Sen insulted Robert at the nightclub; it was hilarious LMAO.Robert tried to blackmail Lena though: date me and I'll speak good words to keep your job. He's not bad but not good either
Plus, he has a bland personality, he's not interesting at all, even more in a porn game.
Any reasonable person realizes the "going out for a drink" is only official part of what Robert is really demanding from Lena in exchange for his favor. He proves as much starting to make moves on her at first opportunity. And the idea that one has no reason to speak up in defense of someone without having something to personally gain from it, especially if that "something" is sex with person who has been turning them down for weeks if not months, is frankly, vile.He doesn't blackmail her. If she doesn't go out for a drink with him, he doesn't speak up for her. I mean why would he?
He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.Any reasonable person realizes the "going out for a drink" is only official part of what Robert is really demanding from Lena in exchange for his favor. He proves as much starting to make moves on her at first opportunity. And the idea that one has no reason to speak up in defense of someone without having something to personally gain from it, especially if that "something" is sex with person who has been turning them down for weeks if not months, is frankly, vile.
What about speaking up out of basic, common decency? You know, the very thing Robert apparently lacks?
Is this Evakiss alt account or something?He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.
He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer. If they have no connection, why would he do that?
No, what happens to make me believe it is the fact if Lena rejects his advances which he initiates afterwards he doesn't put the word in for her like he said he would. His demand is carried through his actions and the consequences, not his words.He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened.
How else was he supposed to ask her out? Maybe without making it a condition to tell her what he claimed was important information regarding her work? I'm acting like it was a sleazy piece of blackmail, because it was.He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You are now inventing something that's not there (or reverting the timeline) It's not a matter of choosing between Lena and another woman when Lena and Robert spoke. Lena's contract was supposed to be reduced/cut due to the mess caused by Axel:You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer.
r "It seems Samantha overheard the chef and the staff chief talking the other day."
l "About what?"
r "About you."
l "About me? Why?"
r "Well, Friday's incident made quite a ruckus. People are talking about it..."
l "Oh, God..."
r "And the chief wasn't too thrilled about what happened on Thursday's service when they had to send you home early."
l "But that wasn't my fault! None of it was..."
r "Of course not, but I guess they're not too pleased with your personal life interfering with work..."
Whether you intentionally tried or not, your posts clearly imply that to which I replied with facts. I never mentioned even a SINGLE time that Ian is less evil than Jeremy or vice versa. Only thing on which IMO they differ is the extent of damage done to relationship.I can assure you, I'm not generally trying to portray Ian as evil. I love Ian as a character, as much as I love Lena, Cindy, Emma, Alison, Ivy, Holly and Jessica. But Cindy is his dark side moment, just as it's possibly his most passionate moment in the whole game. In that moment, he becomes everything that he despises, to pursue Cindy. He's doing exactly the same thing, that his previous girlfriend did to him. That's portrayed by everybody who knows Ian, as an evil act. So is Ian being any less evil himself?...
If Lena doesn't have sex with Jeremy she can get in relationship with Ian so how can you say that Jeremy is NOT the reason of Lena not going for relationship with Ian...But you're wrong about Jeremy. By having sex with Lena, he ultimately doesn't cause any damage at all. Because that's the moment, that Lena decides her and Ian have no future. When they have the talk, Lena says she doesn't want to be his girlfriend. So I'm not sure why you're suggesting they're in a relationship? As soon as Lena decides to have sex with Jeremy, she knows she can't have a relationship with Ian.
They only have a future, if Lena and Jeremy don't have sex. By the time it happens, it's already gone.
You are saying it like it's a bad thing.The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character,
I've never liked Robert since I've been playing this game. I never could articulate why. At first I thought it was because he was the first romantic rival we were introduced to. But I don't have the same issue with the other male characters. As insufferable Axel is, I don't dislike him. Mike is a cheating bastard yet I don't dislike him. Jeremy despite his playboy persona I can tolerate and he even has some redeeming qualities.He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.
He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer. If they have no connection, why would he do that?
Her contract doesn't get renewed if she refuses to fuck him, even if she lets him down gently. Robert is an entitled douche who thinks the girl he likes owes him sex just cause he's "nice to her". These sort of men are a dime a dozen.He doesn't demand to have sex with her, in order to speak up. He tells her he'll do that, before anything happens between the two of them. The fact that you seem to believe that, demonstrates to me that you don't like Robert as character, and that's making you attribute stuff to him that never happened. You really should go back and play the content again.
He makes moves on her, because he fancies her. How else is he supposed to ask her out? You act like that's something obscene?
You say common decency. But there has to be a reason, why he should favour her over the other woman, who has worked there longer. If they have no connection, why would he do that?
It's called coercion.Sure he didn't blackmail Lena but he is using his position of authority to lure Lena into sleeping with him.
The twist: it's EK's self-depreciating self-insert.Dunno, maybe Eva met someone like him and puts of all of her aggressions by constantly mocking him? He is pretty much the exact opposite of that perfect dream boyfriend, the perfect cringy sulky date.