Ren'Py Ovidius - Blood for Love [Act III P1] [Nar_OBL/Narrator Studios]

[The Narrator]

Does the first meeting of Euphemia work as intendit? I refused to accompany her home and the game completely ignored it and proceeded in to the scene of MC leaving with her.

Thank you for the helpful feedback. I'm working on it right now.

 

[The Narrator]

Any Egyptian girls in the game?

 

[Ninjaman2]

How much femdom is in this? It has the tag Female Domination but sometimes that might be only one scene.

 

[gregers]

How much femdom is in this? It has the tag Female Domination but sometimes that might be only one scene.

So far, one scene arguably, two women having sex with the MC at knife-point. From what's here so far it doesn't seem likely to be a major component, but what's here is fairly sloppy so choices have limited impact and the script only makes sense in parts.

Edit: Oh, there's also a lesbian scene early on that may have dommy vibes, but I skipped that so don't know how it plays.

 

[Rodnarr]

Not sure how much historic accuracy is intended.
I found some things that i´m pretty sure isn't accurate.

1 Rome had an emperor not a king.
2 Consul was the highest title in the republic.
3 Some barbarians were blonde Romans were not.
4 There were no actual kingdoms north of Rome after the republic.

 

[GooningButterfly]

3 Some barbarians were blonde Romans were not.

Romans absolutely had blonde hair, they also had gingers.

4 There were no actual kingdoms north of Rome after the republic.

yes there was

 

[SickDian]

Not sure how much historic accuracy is intended.
I found some things that i´m pretty sure isn't accurate.

1 Rome had an emperor not a king.
2 Consul was the highest title in the republic.
3 Some barbarians were blonde Romans were not.
4 There were no actual kingdoms north of Rome after the republic.

1. The Emperor was basically a Monarch, especially under the Dominatus, obviously they won't use that title till the Byzantine Period(Basileus)
2. Correct.
3. Some Romans were blondes; Ottavian was described with "light hair", for example.
4. Germanic Tribes had their own little Kingdoms; arguably, we could include the Dacian Kingdom, which was north of Roman territories.

The weird thing I could say about this game at first it is the period: 120 BC? I wonder if it is a mistake, but that was just two decades after the end of the Third Punic War and barely the start of the Late Republic Era.

 

[gregers]

It's pretty clearly ahistorical nonsense, which isn't a problem in and of itself. Only question is if the dev intends it to "pass" as historical fiction, in which case yeah, it could do with a serious clean-up.

The dev might have done better to not set it in ancient Rome at all, but some entirely fictional setting (and certainly not at that date). It would make it easier to gloss over the incoherences.