- Dec 8, 2017
- 836
- 8,024
You (and True Degenerate) pretty much hit the nail on the head. Kathy is cultivating the girl's appeal, and if the patrons could freely have a go at the Carnations whenever they desired, the designation between Carnation and house girl becomes meaningless. Most patrons (except Isaac ) have access to sex whenever they desire, both outside and inside the club, and what the exhibitions are offering is a curated experience. Kathleen is bringing the audience along for the ride as she unravels and polishes the girls. She's marketing them, so when a patron might finally have access at a select point or even post-competition, he'll be extremely keen about it.I don't want to play the part of the prophet, or the mind reader, with the authors and their narrative... But if I had to guess, I'd say this is a matter of progression and escalation. The Club patrons have access to the Club "employees" as they see fit, more or less, while the Carnations are there for a different reason - for the patrons, the "games" themselves are all in all a matter of vanity and titillation. As TD said, Club patrons aren't allowed direct interaction for the most part. It's very likely that we will see something different in the future - and I'm willing to bet this will have narrative and emotional impact.
I understand if that feels contrived, though. Kathleen deferring to the player as much as she does, with the player character being able to indirectly dictate the results of week 1 and 2, is just prime gamification - and as I've discovered, limits the design space while tripling the work.