- Jul 10, 2018
- 918
- 2,418
If you ever manage to film yourself having sex, you might start to understand. Sex that feels good looks bloody awful on camera. To get it to look good for an audience, you have to get distracted, take really uncomfortable, if not outright painful positions, and constantly be aware people are judging you by the look on her face, the size and technique you have, how many cuts and edits they think you used... And that's for a low-quality, very low potential earning 'home vid' you could upload to a Cams or Users site.I think the MC might be gay if he gets unhappy fucking young girls.
Next invite 8 people who are there because they are professionals with sound equipment, lighting, set dressing, make-up, a director and a couple of camera men and have them all around you before you start right through to your money shot (if you can manage one, and manage to do it on cue, not early or late). Not people you fancy, at all, but people who do this for a living, and have seen better than you thousands of times.
That's why the same few porn star males work over and over again. The ability to perform at all in that situation is quite something, and exceptionally rare. Regular guys usually can't cum at all, frequently lose erection, and professionals called 'fluffers' have to be on hand. Exhibitionists usually have the opposite problem, cum too fast by about 30 minutes (because as with all movie-making, you shoot a lot more footage of each scene than you need so that you can use only the best 20% or so).